患者报告的结果-推进轻链(AL)淀粉样变性临床研究的缺失环节。

IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Tobias Dittrich, Lina Weinert, Anita D'Souza
{"title":"患者报告的结果-推进轻链(AL)淀粉样变性临床研究的缺失环节。","authors":"Tobias Dittrich, Lina Weinert, Anita D'Souza","doi":"10.1016/j.blre.2025.101303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis often results in multi-organ dysfunction and significant morbidity. Clinical assessments may not capture the full impact of disease and treatment on patients. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can help fill this gap. Although evidence suggests that the use of PROs provides additional predictive value beyond established cardiac staging systems, their integration into standard AL amyloidosis management remains limited. Our review examines the prognostic and therapeutic value of PROs and their current use as endpoints in clinical trials. We also discuss practical considerations, including instrument selection and administration, data interpretation, and reporting. Finally, we present a roadmap for integrating PROs into routine AL amyloidosis management, focusing on the selection of appropriate ePRO platforms and implementation strategies. We advocate a framework for data sharing and a coordinated research agenda. By addressing evidence gaps and prioritizing the patient perspective, PROs have the potential to advance AL amyloidosis care and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":56139,"journal":{"name":"Blood Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"101303"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-reported outcomes - the missing link to advancing light chain (AL) amyloidosis clinical research.\",\"authors\":\"Tobias Dittrich, Lina Weinert, Anita D'Souza\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.blre.2025.101303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis often results in multi-organ dysfunction and significant morbidity. Clinical assessments may not capture the full impact of disease and treatment on patients. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can help fill this gap. Although evidence suggests that the use of PROs provides additional predictive value beyond established cardiac staging systems, their integration into standard AL amyloidosis management remains limited. Our review examines the prognostic and therapeutic value of PROs and their current use as endpoints in clinical trials. We also discuss practical considerations, including instrument selection and administration, data interpretation, and reporting. Finally, we present a roadmap for integrating PROs into routine AL amyloidosis management, focusing on the selection of appropriate ePRO platforms and implementation strategies. We advocate a framework for data sharing and a coordinated research agenda. By addressing evidence gaps and prioritizing the patient perspective, PROs have the potential to advance AL amyloidosis care and research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101303\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.blre.2025.101303\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.blre.2025.101303","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

系统性轻链(AL)淀粉样变常导致多器官功能障碍和显著发病率。临床评估可能无法充分反映疾病和治疗对患者的影响。患者报告的结果(PROs)可以帮助填补这一空白。尽管有证据表明,使用pro提供了比已建立的心脏分期系统更多的预测价值,但它们与标准AL淀粉样变管理的整合仍然有限。我们的综述考察了PROs的预后和治疗价值,以及它们目前在临床试验中作为终点的使用情况。我们还讨论了实际考虑,包括仪器的选择和管理,数据解释和报告。最后,我们提出了将pro纳入常规AL淀粉样变性治疗的路线图,重点是选择合适的ePRO平台和实施策略。我们主张建立数据共享框架和协调研究议程。通过解决证据差距和优先考虑患者的观点,PROs有可能推进AL淀粉样变性的治疗和研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient-reported outcomes - the missing link to advancing light chain (AL) amyloidosis clinical research.

Systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis often results in multi-organ dysfunction and significant morbidity. Clinical assessments may not capture the full impact of disease and treatment on patients. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can help fill this gap. Although evidence suggests that the use of PROs provides additional predictive value beyond established cardiac staging systems, their integration into standard AL amyloidosis management remains limited. Our review examines the prognostic and therapeutic value of PROs and their current use as endpoints in clinical trials. We also discuss practical considerations, including instrument selection and administration, data interpretation, and reporting. Finally, we present a roadmap for integrating PROs into routine AL amyloidosis management, focusing on the selection of appropriate ePRO platforms and implementation strategies. We advocate a framework for data sharing and a coordinated research agenda. By addressing evidence gaps and prioritizing the patient perspective, PROs have the potential to advance AL amyloidosis care and research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Blood Reviews
Blood Reviews 医学-血液学
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
1.40%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Blood Reviews, a highly regarded international journal, serves as a vital information hub, offering comprehensive evaluations of clinical practices and research insights from esteemed experts. Specially commissioned, peer-reviewed articles authored by leading researchers and practitioners ensure extensive global coverage across all sub-specialties of hematology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信