一项了解不同社区参与痴呆症研究准备情况的随机前瞻性调查:一项旨在了解不同社区参与痴呆症研究准备情况的随机前瞻性调查。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Martha Sajatovic, Lynn Katherine Herrmann, Clara Knebusch, Nicole Fiorelli, Joy Yala, David Silva, Alan J Lerner, Edna Fuentes-Casiano, Christopher J Burant
{"title":"一项了解不同社区参与痴呆症研究准备情况的随机前瞻性调查:一项旨在了解不同社区参与痴呆症研究准备情况的随机前瞻性调查。","authors":"Martha Sajatovic, Lynn Katherine Herrmann, Clara Knebusch, Nicole Fiorelli, Joy Yala, David Silva, Alan J Lerner, Edna Fuentes-Casiano, Christopher J Burant","doi":"10.1177/07067437251343294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Even with recruitment efforts for racial and ethnic minorities in dementia research, there is still underrepresentation in these communities. Targeting barriers and facilitators to research participation, we developed and tested a culturally tailored communication approach tailored for Hispanics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An iterative process informed by input from the minority advisory board of an Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, developed 2 brief health communication videos, featuring Hispanic actors/Spanish language sub-titles. The experimental video (POWER) focused on barriers, facilitators, and readiness to participate in dementia research. The control video focused on education only. A randomized prospective survey compared POWER vs. control. While race or ethnicity were not inclusion criteria for enrollment, we oversampled Hispanic and non-white communities. We examined change pre- vs. post-video on dementia knowledge, cumulative barriers, and facilitators to research participation, as well as change in research readiness measured by the Transtheoretical behavior change model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analyzable sample (N = 184) had a mean age of 40.0 (SD = 13.2) years, 57.4% (n = 105) female, 47.2% (n = 85) non-white, 21.2% (n = 39) Hispanic, with 88 individuals randomized to POWER and 96 to control. Unadjusted evaluation of change from pre- vs. post-video showed significant improvements in dementia knowledge, research facilitators and research barriers (all ps < .001) but no significant difference between POWER vs. controls. Adjusted for age, gender, race, ethnicity and education, only change in dementia knowledge remained significantly improved for the group as a whole, with no significant difference between POWER vs. controls. In the entire sample, Hispanics had significantly more improvement in research readiness (r = .217, p = .003). Exploratory analysis of positive change predictors in those randomized to POWER and to control suggests Hispanics in POWER may be at a disadvantage with respect to dementia knowledge (r = −.248, p = .02) and research facilitators (r = −.342, p = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health communications can improve dementia knowledge across diverse communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":55283,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":"7067437251343294"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12106381/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Randomized Prospective Survey to Understand Readiness for Participation in Dementia Research Studies Across Diverse Communities: Une enquête prospective à répartition aléatoire visant à comprendre la disposition à participer à des études de recherche sur la démence dans diverses communautés.\",\"authors\":\"Martha Sajatovic, Lynn Katherine Herrmann, Clara Knebusch, Nicole Fiorelli, Joy Yala, David Silva, Alan J Lerner, Edna Fuentes-Casiano, Christopher J Burant\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07067437251343294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Even with recruitment efforts for racial and ethnic minorities in dementia research, there is still underrepresentation in these communities. Targeting barriers and facilitators to research participation, we developed and tested a culturally tailored communication approach tailored for Hispanics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An iterative process informed by input from the minority advisory board of an Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, developed 2 brief health communication videos, featuring Hispanic actors/Spanish language sub-titles. The experimental video (POWER) focused on barriers, facilitators, and readiness to participate in dementia research. The control video focused on education only. A randomized prospective survey compared POWER vs. control. While race or ethnicity were not inclusion criteria for enrollment, we oversampled Hispanic and non-white communities. We examined change pre- vs. post-video on dementia knowledge, cumulative barriers, and facilitators to research participation, as well as change in research readiness measured by the Transtheoretical behavior change model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analyzable sample (N = 184) had a mean age of 40.0 (SD = 13.2) years, 57.4% (n = 105) female, 47.2% (n = 85) non-white, 21.2% (n = 39) Hispanic, with 88 individuals randomized to POWER and 96 to control. Unadjusted evaluation of change from pre- vs. post-video showed significant improvements in dementia knowledge, research facilitators and research barriers (all ps < .001) but no significant difference between POWER vs. controls. Adjusted for age, gender, race, ethnicity and education, only change in dementia knowledge remained significantly improved for the group as a whole, with no significant difference between POWER vs. controls. In the entire sample, Hispanics had significantly more improvement in research readiness (r = .217, p = .003). Exploratory analysis of positive change predictors in those randomized to POWER and to control suggests Hispanics in POWER may be at a disadvantage with respect to dementia knowledge (r = −.248, p = .02) and research facilitators (r = −.342, p = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health communications can improve dementia knowledge across diverse communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"7067437251343294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12106381/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437251343294\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437251343294","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

即使在痴呆症研究中招募了种族和少数民族,这些社区的代表性仍然不足。针对研究参与的障碍和促进因素,我们开发并测试了为西班牙裔量身定制的文化定制沟通方法。方法根据阿尔茨海默病研究中心少数民族咨询委员会的意见,采用迭代过程,制作了2个简短的健康传播视频,配有西班牙裔演员/西班牙语字幕。实验视频(POWER)聚焦于障碍、促进因素和参与痴呆症研究的准备。对照视频只关注教育。一项随机前瞻性调查比较了POWER和control。虽然种族或民族不是纳入标准,但我们对西班牙裔和非白人社区进行了过度抽样。我们研究了视频前后痴呆知识、累积障碍和促进研究参与的因素的变化,以及通过跨理论行为改变模型测量的研究准备的变化。结果可分析样本(N = 184)平均年龄为40.0 (SD = 13.2)岁,女性占57.4% (N = 105),非白人占47.2% (N = 85),西班牙裔占21.2% (N = 39), POWER组88例,对照组96例。未经调整的评估显示,观看视频前后在痴呆知识、研究促进因素和研究障碍方面有显著改善(所有ps r =。217, p = .003)。对POWER组和对照组的积极变化预测因子的探索性分析表明,POWER组的西班牙裔人在痴呆知识方面可能处于劣势(r = -)。248, p = .02)和研究促进者(r = -。342, p = .001)。结论健康交流可以提高不同社区对痴呆症的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Randomized Prospective Survey to Understand Readiness for Participation in Dementia Research Studies Across Diverse Communities: Une enquête prospective à répartition aléatoire visant à comprendre la disposition à participer à des études de recherche sur la démence dans diverses communautés.

Objective: Even with recruitment efforts for racial and ethnic minorities in dementia research, there is still underrepresentation in these communities. Targeting barriers and facilitators to research participation, we developed and tested a culturally tailored communication approach tailored for Hispanics.

Methods: An iterative process informed by input from the minority advisory board of an Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, developed 2 brief health communication videos, featuring Hispanic actors/Spanish language sub-titles. The experimental video (POWER) focused on barriers, facilitators, and readiness to participate in dementia research. The control video focused on education only. A randomized prospective survey compared POWER vs. control. While race or ethnicity were not inclusion criteria for enrollment, we oversampled Hispanic and non-white communities. We examined change pre- vs. post-video on dementia knowledge, cumulative barriers, and facilitators to research participation, as well as change in research readiness measured by the Transtheoretical behavior change model.

Results: The analyzable sample (N = 184) had a mean age of 40.0 (SD = 13.2) years, 57.4% (n = 105) female, 47.2% (n = 85) non-white, 21.2% (n = 39) Hispanic, with 88 individuals randomized to POWER and 96 to control. Unadjusted evaluation of change from pre- vs. post-video showed significant improvements in dementia knowledge, research facilitators and research barriers (all ps < .001) but no significant difference between POWER vs. controls. Adjusted for age, gender, race, ethnicity and education, only change in dementia knowledge remained significantly improved for the group as a whole, with no significant difference between POWER vs. controls. In the entire sample, Hispanics had significantly more improvement in research readiness (r = .217, p = .003). Exploratory analysis of positive change predictors in those randomized to POWER and to control suggests Hispanics in POWER may be at a disadvantage with respect to dementia knowledge (r = −.248, p = .02) and research facilitators (r = −.342, p = .001).

Conclusions: Health communications can improve dementia knowledge across diverse communities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1956, The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (The CJP) has been keeping psychiatrists up-to-date on the latest research for nearly 60 years. The CJP provides a forum for psychiatry and mental health professionals to share their findings with researchers and clinicians. The CJP includes peer-reviewed scientific articles analyzing ongoing developments in Canadian and international psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信