基于Glasso和Atan正则化的网络分析中EM和多重输入的缺失数据处理。

IF 5.3 3区 心理学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Kai Jannik Nehler, Martin Schultze
{"title":"基于Glasso和Atan正则化的网络分析中EM和多重输入的缺失数据处理。","authors":"Kai Jannik Nehler, Martin Schultze","doi":"10.1080/00273171.2025.2503833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The existing literature on missing data handling in psychological network analysis using cross-sectional data is currently limited to likelihood based approaches. In addition, there is a focus on convex regularization, with the missing handling implemented using different calculations in model selection across various packages. Our work aims to contribute to the literature by implementing a missing data handling approach based on multiple imputation, specifically stacking the imputations, and evaluating it against direct and two-step EM methods. Standardized model selection across the multiple imputation and EM methods is ensured, and the comparative evaluation between the missing handling methods is performed separately for convex regularization (glasso) and nonconvex regularization (atan). Simulated conditions vary network size, number of observations, and amount of missingness. Evaluation criteria encompass edge set recovery, partial correlation bias, and correlation of network statistics. Overall, missing data handling approaches exhibit similar performance under many conditions. Using glasso with EBIC model selection, the two-step EM method performs best overall, closely followed by stacked multiple imputation. For atan regularization using BIC model selection, stacked multiple imputation proves most consistent across all conditions and evaluation criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":53155,"journal":{"name":"Multivariate Behavioral Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Missing Data Handling via EM and Multiple Imputation in Network Analysis using Glasso and Atan Regularization.\",\"authors\":\"Kai Jannik Nehler, Martin Schultze\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00273171.2025.2503833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The existing literature on missing data handling in psychological network analysis using cross-sectional data is currently limited to likelihood based approaches. In addition, there is a focus on convex regularization, with the missing handling implemented using different calculations in model selection across various packages. Our work aims to contribute to the literature by implementing a missing data handling approach based on multiple imputation, specifically stacking the imputations, and evaluating it against direct and two-step EM methods. Standardized model selection across the multiple imputation and EM methods is ensured, and the comparative evaluation between the missing handling methods is performed separately for convex regularization (glasso) and nonconvex regularization (atan). Simulated conditions vary network size, number of observations, and amount of missingness. Evaluation criteria encompass edge set recovery, partial correlation bias, and correlation of network statistics. Overall, missing data handling approaches exhibit similar performance under many conditions. Using glasso with EBIC model selection, the two-step EM method performs best overall, closely followed by stacked multiple imputation. For atan regularization using BIC model selection, stacked multiple imputation proves most consistent across all conditions and evaluation criteria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multivariate Behavioral Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multivariate Behavioral Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2025.2503833\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multivariate Behavioral Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2025.2503833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现有文献对缺失数据处理在心理网络分析中使用横截面数据目前仅限于基于似然的方法。此外,还有一个重点是凸正则化,在不同的包中使用不同的模型选择计算来实现缺失的处理。我们的工作旨在通过实现基于多重输入的缺失数据处理方法,特别是堆叠输入,并根据直接和两步EM方法对其进行评估,从而为文献做出贡献。保证了多重插值和EM方法之间的标准化模型选择,并分别对凸正则化(glasso)和非凸正则化(atan)的缺失处理方法进行了比较评估。模拟的条件随网络大小、观察次数和缺失量的变化而变化。评估标准包括边缘集恢复、部分相关偏差和网络统计的相关性。总的来说,缺失数据处理方法在许多条件下表现出类似的性能。使用glasso和EBIC模型选择,两步EM方法总体上表现最好,其次是堆叠多次插入。对于使用BIC模型选择的atan正则化,叠置多重插值证明在所有条件和评价标准下是最一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Missing Data Handling via EM and Multiple Imputation in Network Analysis using Glasso and Atan Regularization.

The existing literature on missing data handling in psychological network analysis using cross-sectional data is currently limited to likelihood based approaches. In addition, there is a focus on convex regularization, with the missing handling implemented using different calculations in model selection across various packages. Our work aims to contribute to the literature by implementing a missing data handling approach based on multiple imputation, specifically stacking the imputations, and evaluating it against direct and two-step EM methods. Standardized model selection across the multiple imputation and EM methods is ensured, and the comparative evaluation between the missing handling methods is performed separately for convex regularization (glasso) and nonconvex regularization (atan). Simulated conditions vary network size, number of observations, and amount of missingness. Evaluation criteria encompass edge set recovery, partial correlation bias, and correlation of network statistics. Overall, missing data handling approaches exhibit similar performance under many conditions. Using glasso with EBIC model selection, the two-step EM method performs best overall, closely followed by stacked multiple imputation. For atan regularization using BIC model selection, stacked multiple imputation proves most consistent across all conditions and evaluation criteria.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Multivariate Behavioral Research
Multivariate Behavioral Research 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.60%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Multivariate Behavioral Research (MBR) publishes a variety of substantive, methodological, and theoretical articles in all areas of the social and behavioral sciences. Most MBR articles fall into one of two categories. Substantive articles report on applications of sophisticated multivariate research methods to study topics of substantive interest in personality, health, intelligence, industrial/organizational, and other behavioral science areas. Methodological articles present and/or evaluate new developments in multivariate methods, or address methodological issues in current research. We also encourage submission of integrative articles related to pedagogy involving multivariate research methods, and to historical treatments of interest and relevance to multivariate research methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信