恒牙第五代、第七代、第八代黏合剂抗剪强度的体外比较研究。

Q3 Dentistry
Simran Gupta, Sunil Gupta, Manjul Mehra, Teena Gupta, Rashu Grover
{"title":"恒牙第五代、第七代、第八代黏合剂抗剪强度的体外比较研究。","authors":"Simran Gupta, Sunil Gupta, Manjul Mehra, Teena Gupta, Rashu Grover","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and background: </strong>In achieving clinical success with adhesive materials, bond strength holds significant importance. The goal of testing the strength of the bond is to establish a value for how strong the binding of an adhesive system is to the dental structures. The aim of this <i>in vitro</i> study is to comparatively evaluate the shear bond strength of fifth, seventh, and eighth-generations of bonding agents.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty-five extracted permanent teeth were allotted into three groups (<i>n</i> = 15), namely, group A: ADPER single bond 2, group B: single bond universal, group C: G-Premio bond. Etchant was applied to the exposed surface, and then adhesive was applied as stated in the manufacturer's instructions, followed by composite (Z350) buildup. The maximum shear force required to debond the specimen was recorded using a universal testing machine. One-way ANOVA test was utilized for statistical comparison at each assessment point, with the significance level set at <i>p</i> < 0.05 using SPSS statistical tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum shear bond strength was reported for group C, with the mean shear bond strengths of groups A, B, and C being 13.23, 9.66, and 19.21 MPa, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The newly introduced eighth-generation adhesive showed superior bond strength values compared to the fifth and seventh-generation bonding agents; this difference was statistically significant.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Gupta S, Gupta S, Mehra M, <i>et al</i>. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Fifth, Seventh, and Eighth-generation Bonding Agents in Permanent Teeth: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(3):281-286.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"18 3","pages":"281-286"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096866/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Fifth, Seventh, and Eighth-generation Bonding Agents in Permanent Teeth: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.\",\"authors\":\"Simran Gupta, Sunil Gupta, Manjul Mehra, Teena Gupta, Rashu Grover\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims and background: </strong>In achieving clinical success with adhesive materials, bond strength holds significant importance. The goal of testing the strength of the bond is to establish a value for how strong the binding of an adhesive system is to the dental structures. The aim of this <i>in vitro</i> study is to comparatively evaluate the shear bond strength of fifth, seventh, and eighth-generations of bonding agents.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty-five extracted permanent teeth were allotted into three groups (<i>n</i> = 15), namely, group A: ADPER single bond 2, group B: single bond universal, group C: G-Premio bond. Etchant was applied to the exposed surface, and then adhesive was applied as stated in the manufacturer's instructions, followed by composite (Z350) buildup. The maximum shear force required to debond the specimen was recorded using a universal testing machine. One-way ANOVA test was utilized for statistical comparison at each assessment point, with the significance level set at <i>p</i> < 0.05 using SPSS statistical tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum shear bond strength was reported for group C, with the mean shear bond strengths of groups A, B, and C being 13.23, 9.66, and 19.21 MPa, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The newly introduced eighth-generation adhesive showed superior bond strength values compared to the fifth and seventh-generation bonding agents; this difference was statistically significant.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Gupta S, Gupta S, Mehra M, <i>et al</i>. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Fifth, Seventh, and Eighth-generation Bonding Agents in Permanent Teeth: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(3):281-286.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"281-286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096866/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的和背景:在取得临床成功的粘合材料,粘结强度具有重要意义。测试粘接强度的目的是为了确定粘接系统与牙齿结构的结合强度。本体外实验的目的是比较评价第五代、第七代和第八代粘结剂的剪切粘结强度。材料与方法:将45颗拔除的恒牙分为3组(n = 15),即A组:ADPER单键2,B组:单键万能,C组:G-Premio键。在暴露的表面涂上蚀刻剂,然后按照制造商的说明涂上粘合剂,然后涂上复合材料(Z350)。用万能试验机记录试样剥离所需的最大剪切力。各评估点采用单因素方差分析进行统计比较,采用SPSS统计工具,显著性水平设为p < 0.05。结果:C组的剪切结合强度最大,A、B、C组的平均剪切结合强度分别为13.23、9.66、19.21 MPa。结论:新推出的第八代胶粘剂与第五代、第七代胶粘剂相比,具有较好的粘结强度;这一差异具有统计学意义。如何引用本文:Gupta S, Gupta S, Mehra M等。恒牙第五代、第七代、第八代黏合剂抗剪强度的体外比较研究。中华临床儿科杂志,2015;18(3):281-286。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Fifth, Seventh, and Eighth-generation Bonding Agents in Permanent Teeth: An In Vitro Study.

Aims and background: In achieving clinical success with adhesive materials, bond strength holds significant importance. The goal of testing the strength of the bond is to establish a value for how strong the binding of an adhesive system is to the dental structures. The aim of this in vitro study is to comparatively evaluate the shear bond strength of fifth, seventh, and eighth-generations of bonding agents.

Materials and methods: Forty-five extracted permanent teeth were allotted into three groups (n = 15), namely, group A: ADPER single bond 2, group B: single bond universal, group C: G-Premio bond. Etchant was applied to the exposed surface, and then adhesive was applied as stated in the manufacturer's instructions, followed by composite (Z350) buildup. The maximum shear force required to debond the specimen was recorded using a universal testing machine. One-way ANOVA test was utilized for statistical comparison at each assessment point, with the significance level set at p < 0.05 using SPSS statistical tool.

Results: The maximum shear bond strength was reported for group C, with the mean shear bond strengths of groups A, B, and C being 13.23, 9.66, and 19.21 MPa, respectively.

Conclusion: The newly introduced eighth-generation adhesive showed superior bond strength values compared to the fifth and seventh-generation bonding agents; this difference was statistically significant.

How to cite this article: Gupta S, Gupta S, Mehra M, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Fifth, Seventh, and Eighth-generation Bonding Agents in Permanent Teeth: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(3):281-286.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信