老年人慢性利尿剂使用的有效性和安全性:近期发表的系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析综述

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
European Geriatric Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-25 DOI:10.1007/s41999-025-01229-5
Eveline van Poelgeest, Konstantinos Prokopidis, Tuğba Erdogan, Min Ji Kwak, Karolina Piotrowicz, Luca Paoletti, Annette Eidam, Fatma Özge Kayhan Koçak, Birkan Ilhan, Alessia Beccacece, George Soulis, Serdar Özkök, Gulistan Bahat, Eva Topinková, Joost Daams, M Louis Handoko, Parag Goyal, Jerzy Gąsowski, Antonio Cherubini, Nicola Veronese, Giuseppe Dario Testa, Wade Thompson, Nathalie van der Velde
{"title":"老年人慢性利尿剂使用的有效性和安全性:近期发表的系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析综述","authors":"Eveline van Poelgeest, Konstantinos Prokopidis, Tuğba Erdogan, Min Ji Kwak, Karolina Piotrowicz, Luca Paoletti, Annette Eidam, Fatma Özge Kayhan Koçak, Birkan Ilhan, Alessia Beccacece, George Soulis, Serdar Özkök, Gulistan Bahat, Eva Topinková, Joost Daams, M Louis Handoko, Parag Goyal, Jerzy Gąsowski, Antonio Cherubini, Nicola Veronese, Giuseppe Dario Testa, Wade Thompson, Nathalie van der Velde","doi":"10.1007/s41999-025-01229-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare providers should balance the potential risks and benefits of chronic diuretic use, particularly in older adults, as with age, diuretic benefits may decline and risks increase. A comprehensive synthesis and critical evaluation of the available evidence on chronic diuretic treatment effects is currently lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published since 2018 on health outcomes associated with diuretic use in randomized-controlled trials (RCTs). We conducted random-effects meta-analysis for pooled effect estimates and narratively summarized data that could not be pooled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 741 effect estimations from 117 systematic reviews (SRs) on 1566 RCTs in individuals aged 62 ± 6 years. Of our 33 meta-analyses, 11 provided convincing, high-quality evidence: finerenone reduced the risk of cardiovascular (CV) mortality and end-stage kidney disease in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and/or type 2 diabetes (T2D). Torasemide reduced the risk of heart failure-related hospitalization (HFH) more than furosemide in individuals with HF. Thiazides reduced CV events in individuals with hypertension. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) reduced HFH, but also increased hyperkalemia risk in individuals with HF. MRAs also reduced the risk of atrial fibrillation in those with HF or CVD, and reduced HFH, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), > 40% eGFR decrease, and composite kidney outcomes in individuals with CKD and/or T2D. Lower quality evidence suggests that in older (≥ 65 years), but not in younger adults, diuretics may reduce CV mortality, but also increase adverse event (AE) risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our umbrella review offers a comprehensive and up-to-date evaluation of the benefits and harms of diuretics. However, further research is needed to establish their efficacy and safety in populations commonly seen in clinical practice, especially older adults living with multimorbidity and frailty.</p>","PeriodicalId":49287,"journal":{"name":"European Geriatric Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1353-1387"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and safety of chronic diuretic use in older adults: an umbrella review of recently published systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized-controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Eveline van Poelgeest, Konstantinos Prokopidis, Tuğba Erdogan, Min Ji Kwak, Karolina Piotrowicz, Luca Paoletti, Annette Eidam, Fatma Özge Kayhan Koçak, Birkan Ilhan, Alessia Beccacece, George Soulis, Serdar Özkök, Gulistan Bahat, Eva Topinková, Joost Daams, M Louis Handoko, Parag Goyal, Jerzy Gąsowski, Antonio Cherubini, Nicola Veronese, Giuseppe Dario Testa, Wade Thompson, Nathalie van der Velde\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41999-025-01229-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare providers should balance the potential risks and benefits of chronic diuretic use, particularly in older adults, as with age, diuretic benefits may decline and risks increase. A comprehensive synthesis and critical evaluation of the available evidence on chronic diuretic treatment effects is currently lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published since 2018 on health outcomes associated with diuretic use in randomized-controlled trials (RCTs). We conducted random-effects meta-analysis for pooled effect estimates and narratively summarized data that could not be pooled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 741 effect estimations from 117 systematic reviews (SRs) on 1566 RCTs in individuals aged 62 ± 6 years. Of our 33 meta-analyses, 11 provided convincing, high-quality evidence: finerenone reduced the risk of cardiovascular (CV) mortality and end-stage kidney disease in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and/or type 2 diabetes (T2D). Torasemide reduced the risk of heart failure-related hospitalization (HFH) more than furosemide in individuals with HF. Thiazides reduced CV events in individuals with hypertension. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) reduced HFH, but also increased hyperkalemia risk in individuals with HF. MRAs also reduced the risk of atrial fibrillation in those with HF or CVD, and reduced HFH, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), > 40% eGFR decrease, and composite kidney outcomes in individuals with CKD and/or T2D. Lower quality evidence suggests that in older (≥ 65 years), but not in younger adults, diuretics may reduce CV mortality, but also increase adverse event (AE) risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our umbrella review offers a comprehensive and up-to-date evaluation of the benefits and harms of diuretics. However, further research is needed to establish their efficacy and safety in populations commonly seen in clinical practice, especially older adults living with multimorbidity and frailty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Geriatric Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1353-1387\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378697/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Geriatric Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-025-01229-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-025-01229-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医疗保健提供者应平衡慢性利尿剂使用的潜在风险和益处,特别是在老年人中,因为随着年龄的增长,利尿剂的益处可能会下降而风险会增加。目前缺乏对慢性利尿剂治疗效果现有证据的综合和批判性评价。方法:我们对自2018年以来发表的随机对照试验(rct)中与利尿剂使用相关的健康结果的系统评价和荟萃分析进行了总括性回顾。我们对合并效应估计进行了随机效应荟萃分析,并对无法合并的数据进行了叙述性总结。结果:我们纳入了来自117个系统评价(SRs)的741个效应估计,这些评价来自1566个随机对照试验,受试者年龄为62±6岁。在我们的33项荟萃分析中,11项提供了令人信服的高质量证据:芬芬酮降低了慢性肾病(CKD)和/或2型糖尿病(T2D)患者心血管(CV)死亡率和终末期肾病的风险。在HF患者中,托拉塞米比速尿更能降低心力衰竭相关住院(HFH)的风险。噻嗪类药物可降低高血压患者的心血管事件。矿盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRAs)降低HFH,但也增加HF患者高钾血症的风险。MRAs还降低了HF或CVD患者房颤的风险,降低了HFH、主要不良心血管事件(mace)、eGFR下降40%,以及CKD和/或T2D患者的复合肾脏结局。较低质量的证据表明,在老年人(≥65岁)中,利尿剂可能降低CV死亡率,但也会增加不良事件(AE)风险,而在年轻人中则没有。结论:我们的综述对利尿剂的利弊进行了全面和最新的评估。然而,需要进一步的研究来确定它们在临床实践中常见的人群中的有效性和安全性,特别是患有多种疾病和虚弱的老年人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effectiveness and safety of chronic diuretic use in older adults: an umbrella review of recently published systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized-controlled trials.

Effectiveness and safety of chronic diuretic use in older adults: an umbrella review of recently published systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized-controlled trials.

Effectiveness and safety of chronic diuretic use in older adults: an umbrella review of recently published systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized-controlled trials.

Background: Healthcare providers should balance the potential risks and benefits of chronic diuretic use, particularly in older adults, as with age, diuretic benefits may decline and risks increase. A comprehensive synthesis and critical evaluation of the available evidence on chronic diuretic treatment effects is currently lacking.

Methods: We conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published since 2018 on health outcomes associated with diuretic use in randomized-controlled trials (RCTs). We conducted random-effects meta-analysis for pooled effect estimates and narratively summarized data that could not be pooled.

Results: We included 741 effect estimations from 117 systematic reviews (SRs) on 1566 RCTs in individuals aged 62 ± 6 years. Of our 33 meta-analyses, 11 provided convincing, high-quality evidence: finerenone reduced the risk of cardiovascular (CV) mortality and end-stage kidney disease in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and/or type 2 diabetes (T2D). Torasemide reduced the risk of heart failure-related hospitalization (HFH) more than furosemide in individuals with HF. Thiazides reduced CV events in individuals with hypertension. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) reduced HFH, but also increased hyperkalemia risk in individuals with HF. MRAs also reduced the risk of atrial fibrillation in those with HF or CVD, and reduced HFH, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), > 40% eGFR decrease, and composite kidney outcomes in individuals with CKD and/or T2D. Lower quality evidence suggests that in older (≥ 65 years), but not in younger adults, diuretics may reduce CV mortality, but also increase adverse event (AE) risk.

Conclusions: Our umbrella review offers a comprehensive and up-to-date evaluation of the benefits and harms of diuretics. However, further research is needed to establish their efficacy and safety in populations commonly seen in clinical practice, especially older adults living with multimorbidity and frailty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Geriatric Medicine
European Geriatric Medicine GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Geriatric Medicine is the official journal of the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS). Launched in 2010, this journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of Geriatric Medicine. The EUGMS is interested in the promotion of Geriatric Medicine in any setting (acute or subacute care, rehabilitation, nursing homes, primary care, fall clinics, ambulatory assessment, dementia clinics..), and also in functionality in old age, comprehensive geriatric assessment, geriatric syndromes, geriatric education, old age psychiatry, models of geriatric care in health services, and quality assurance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信