父母认知知觉在儿童癌症易感性基因检测结果与父母心理调节之间的调节作用。

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Leila Sachner, Jessica S Flynn, Chia-Wei Hsu, Haitao Pan, Niki Jurbergs, Alise Blake, Rose B McGee, Lynn Harrison, Missy Robinson, Tolulope Adanri, Kim E Nichols, Katianne M Howard Sharp
{"title":"父母认知知觉在儿童癌症易感性基因检测结果与父母心理调节之间的调节作用。","authors":"Leila Sachner, Jessica S Flynn, Chia-Wei Hsu, Haitao Pan, Niki Jurbergs, Alise Blake, Rose B McGee, Lynn Harrison, Missy Robinson, Tolulope Adanri, Kim E Nichols, Katianne M Howard Sharp","doi":"10.1093/jpepsy/jsaf026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Children with cancer increasingly undergo germline genetic testing to identify genetic predispositions and inform clinical care options. Parents of children with pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline results have reported more distress than parents of children with negative results. Little is known about modifiable risk and resilience factors for intervention, such as cognitive perceptions. This study examined the moderating effects of parents' cognitive perceptions on adjustment to their child's germline genetic test results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Parents (N = 191) completed surveys reporting cognitive perceptions (i.e., intolerance of uncertainty, symptom attributions, and perceptions of child physical vulnerability) and psychological adjustment 1-3.99 years post-disclosure of their child's genetic test results. Moderation analyses examined whether parents' cognitive perceptions moderated the relation between children's cancer predisposition genetic testing results (P/LP, uncertain [VUS], or negative) and parental psychological adjustment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Moderation analyses revealed significant interactions between genetic test results and both intolerance of uncertainty and psychological attributions for children's symptoms. Specifically, parents of children with P/LP results endorsed significantly more distress and uncertainty compared to each VUS and negative results, only in cases of moderate to high intolerance of uncertainty and psychological attributions (distress outcomes). In contrast, somatic attributions for symptoms and perceived child vulnerability were directly associated with higher distress regardless of results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cognitions such as intolerance of uncertainty and psychological symptom attribution may contribute to distress among parents of children with P/LP results. Therefore, cognitive interventions (e.g., Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy) may help parents manage distress regarding their child's genetic cancer risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":48372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The moderating role of parental cognitive perceptions in the link between children's cancer predisposition genetic testing results and parent psychological adjustment.\",\"authors\":\"Leila Sachner, Jessica S Flynn, Chia-Wei Hsu, Haitao Pan, Niki Jurbergs, Alise Blake, Rose B McGee, Lynn Harrison, Missy Robinson, Tolulope Adanri, Kim E Nichols, Katianne M Howard Sharp\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jpepsy/jsaf026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Children with cancer increasingly undergo germline genetic testing to identify genetic predispositions and inform clinical care options. Parents of children with pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline results have reported more distress than parents of children with negative results. Little is known about modifiable risk and resilience factors for intervention, such as cognitive perceptions. This study examined the moderating effects of parents' cognitive perceptions on adjustment to their child's germline genetic test results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Parents (N = 191) completed surveys reporting cognitive perceptions (i.e., intolerance of uncertainty, symptom attributions, and perceptions of child physical vulnerability) and psychological adjustment 1-3.99 years post-disclosure of their child's genetic test results. Moderation analyses examined whether parents' cognitive perceptions moderated the relation between children's cancer predisposition genetic testing results (P/LP, uncertain [VUS], or negative) and parental psychological adjustment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Moderation analyses revealed significant interactions between genetic test results and both intolerance of uncertainty and psychological attributions for children's symptoms. Specifically, parents of children with P/LP results endorsed significantly more distress and uncertainty compared to each VUS and negative results, only in cases of moderate to high intolerance of uncertainty and psychological attributions (distress outcomes). In contrast, somatic attributions for symptoms and perceived child vulnerability were directly associated with higher distress regardless of results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cognitions such as intolerance of uncertainty and psychological symptom attribution may contribute to distress among parents of children with P/LP results. Therefore, cognitive interventions (e.g., Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy) may help parents manage distress regarding their child's genetic cancer risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsaf026\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsaf026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:患有癌症的儿童越来越多地接受生殖系基因检测,以确定遗传易感性并为临床护理选择提供信息。有致病性/可能致病性(P/LP)种系结果的孩子的父母比阴性结果的孩子的父母更苦恼。对干预的可改变的风险和恢复力因素知之甚少,例如认知知觉。本研究考察了父母的认知知觉对孩子生殖系基因检测结果的调节作用。方法:191名父母在孩子基因检测结果披露后1-3.99年完成了认知知觉(即对不确定性的不耐受、症状归因和对儿童身体脆弱性的感知)和心理调整的调查。调节分析考察了父母的认知知觉是否调节了儿童癌症易感性基因检测结果(P/LP,不确定[VUS],或阴性)与父母心理调节之间的关系。结果:适度分析显示,基因检测结果与儿童症状的不确定性耐受性和心理归因之间存在显著的相互作用。具体而言,与VUS和阴性结果相比,P/LP结果的儿童的父母仅在中度至高度不耐受不确定性和心理归因(痛苦结果)的情况下才认可更多的痛苦和不确定性。相比之下,无论结果如何,症状的躯体归因和感知到的儿童脆弱性与更高的痛苦直接相关。结论:P/LP结果患儿家长的焦虑可能源于对不确定性的不耐受和心理症状归因等认知。因此,认知干预(例如,认知行为治疗,接受和承诺治疗)可以帮助父母管理孩子遗传癌症风险的痛苦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The moderating role of parental cognitive perceptions in the link between children's cancer predisposition genetic testing results and parent psychological adjustment.

Objective: Children with cancer increasingly undergo germline genetic testing to identify genetic predispositions and inform clinical care options. Parents of children with pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline results have reported more distress than parents of children with negative results. Little is known about modifiable risk and resilience factors for intervention, such as cognitive perceptions. This study examined the moderating effects of parents' cognitive perceptions on adjustment to their child's germline genetic test results.

Methods: Parents (N = 191) completed surveys reporting cognitive perceptions (i.e., intolerance of uncertainty, symptom attributions, and perceptions of child physical vulnerability) and psychological adjustment 1-3.99 years post-disclosure of their child's genetic test results. Moderation analyses examined whether parents' cognitive perceptions moderated the relation between children's cancer predisposition genetic testing results (P/LP, uncertain [VUS], or negative) and parental psychological adjustment.

Results: Moderation analyses revealed significant interactions between genetic test results and both intolerance of uncertainty and psychological attributions for children's symptoms. Specifically, parents of children with P/LP results endorsed significantly more distress and uncertainty compared to each VUS and negative results, only in cases of moderate to high intolerance of uncertainty and psychological attributions (distress outcomes). In contrast, somatic attributions for symptoms and perceived child vulnerability were directly associated with higher distress regardless of results.

Conclusions: Cognitions such as intolerance of uncertainty and psychological symptom attribution may contribute to distress among parents of children with P/LP results. Therefore, cognitive interventions (e.g., Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy) may help parents manage distress regarding their child's genetic cancer risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Journal of Pediatric Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Psychology is the official journal of the Society of Pediatric Psychology, Division 54 of the American Psychological Association. The Journal of Pediatric Psychology publishes articles related to theory, research, and professional practice in pediatric psychology. Pediatric psychology is an integrated field of science and practice in which the principles of psychology are applied within the context of pediatric health. The field aims to promote the health and development of children, adolescents, and their families through use of evidence-based methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信