Jessica L Liddell, Al Garnsey, Annie Glover, Emma Piskolich
{"title":"在美国使用导乐来支持农村围产期人的系统评价。","authors":"Jessica L Liddell, Al Garnsey, Annie Glover, Emma Piskolich","doi":"10.1007/s10995-025-04106-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Maternal health outcomes are frequently worse for individuals living in rural and remote communities due to the distance people must travel for healthcare, higher rates of poverty, and higher risk factors for related health conditions, such as mental illness and substance use. Doulas, non-medical childbirth companions, provide emotional, informational, physical, and advocacy support to people during pregnancy, birth, and postpartum. Research has documented doulas' positive impact on birth outcomes, including lower rates of induction and cesarean birth. The benefits of doulas may be especially important for marginalized and underserved populations who experience disparate health outcomes, including rural residents. This scoping review was conducted to describe and assess the landscape of doula-focused research that focuses on the unique contextual challenges faced by rural communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review of research exploring the use of doulas in rural contexts. Peer-reviewed articles presenting original research using both quantitative and qualitative methods were included. Target populations for the included studies were rural perinatal people receiving doula support or doulas in rural contexts. All definitions of rurality were included. Database index terms were searched as well as keyword search terms: \"rural\" AND \"doula\" OR \"labor coach\" OR \"birthing coach\" OR \"childbirth coach\" OR \"birth attendant\" AND \"United States\" OR \"U.S.A.\"12 peer-reviewed journal databases and Google Scholar were searched May 2022- September 2023. Data was synthesized using tabular and narrative methods to capture (a) study design and type, b) study purpose, c) population, d) study location, e) analysis, d) definition of rurality, and e) reported results and gaps in the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2,195 articles were identified. After removing duplicates and ineligible studies, 3 articles were included in the final results. These articles included quantitative (1), qualitative (1), and mixed methods (1) studies exploring access to and perceptions of doulas in rural areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings demonstrate limited scholarship on the use of doulas in rural settings. This area of research warrants further attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":48367,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"733-740"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review of the Use of Doulas to Support Rural Perinatal People in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica L Liddell, Al Garnsey, Annie Glover, Emma Piskolich\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10995-025-04106-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Maternal health outcomes are frequently worse for individuals living in rural and remote communities due to the distance people must travel for healthcare, higher rates of poverty, and higher risk factors for related health conditions, such as mental illness and substance use. Doulas, non-medical childbirth companions, provide emotional, informational, physical, and advocacy support to people during pregnancy, birth, and postpartum. Research has documented doulas' positive impact on birth outcomes, including lower rates of induction and cesarean birth. The benefits of doulas may be especially important for marginalized and underserved populations who experience disparate health outcomes, including rural residents. This scoping review was conducted to describe and assess the landscape of doula-focused research that focuses on the unique contextual challenges faced by rural communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review of research exploring the use of doulas in rural contexts. Peer-reviewed articles presenting original research using both quantitative and qualitative methods were included. Target populations for the included studies were rural perinatal people receiving doula support or doulas in rural contexts. All definitions of rurality were included. Database index terms were searched as well as keyword search terms: \\\"rural\\\" AND \\\"doula\\\" OR \\\"labor coach\\\" OR \\\"birthing coach\\\" OR \\\"childbirth coach\\\" OR \\\"birth attendant\\\" AND \\\"United States\\\" OR \\\"U.S.A.\\\"12 peer-reviewed journal databases and Google Scholar were searched May 2022- September 2023. Data was synthesized using tabular and narrative methods to capture (a) study design and type, b) study purpose, c) population, d) study location, e) analysis, d) definition of rurality, and e) reported results and gaps in the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2,195 articles were identified. After removing duplicates and ineligible studies, 3 articles were included in the final results. These articles included quantitative (1), qualitative (1), and mixed methods (1) studies exploring access to and perceptions of doulas in rural areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings demonstrate limited scholarship on the use of doulas in rural settings. This area of research warrants further attention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maternal and Child Health Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"733-740\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maternal and Child Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-025-04106-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-025-04106-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Systematic Review of the Use of Doulas to Support Rural Perinatal People in the United States.
Introduction: Maternal health outcomes are frequently worse for individuals living in rural and remote communities due to the distance people must travel for healthcare, higher rates of poverty, and higher risk factors for related health conditions, such as mental illness and substance use. Doulas, non-medical childbirth companions, provide emotional, informational, physical, and advocacy support to people during pregnancy, birth, and postpartum. Research has documented doulas' positive impact on birth outcomes, including lower rates of induction and cesarean birth. The benefits of doulas may be especially important for marginalized and underserved populations who experience disparate health outcomes, including rural residents. This scoping review was conducted to describe and assess the landscape of doula-focused research that focuses on the unique contextual challenges faced by rural communities.
Methods: We conducted a scoping review of research exploring the use of doulas in rural contexts. Peer-reviewed articles presenting original research using both quantitative and qualitative methods were included. Target populations for the included studies were rural perinatal people receiving doula support or doulas in rural contexts. All definitions of rurality were included. Database index terms were searched as well as keyword search terms: "rural" AND "doula" OR "labor coach" OR "birthing coach" OR "childbirth coach" OR "birth attendant" AND "United States" OR "U.S.A."12 peer-reviewed journal databases and Google Scholar were searched May 2022- September 2023. Data was synthesized using tabular and narrative methods to capture (a) study design and type, b) study purpose, c) population, d) study location, e) analysis, d) definition of rurality, and e) reported results and gaps in the literature.
Results: 2,195 articles were identified. After removing duplicates and ineligible studies, 3 articles were included in the final results. These articles included quantitative (1), qualitative (1), and mixed methods (1) studies exploring access to and perceptions of doulas in rural areas.
Conclusion: Findings demonstrate limited scholarship on the use of doulas in rural settings. This area of research warrants further attention.
期刊介绍:
Maternal and Child Health Journal is the first exclusive forum to advance the scientific and professional knowledge base of the maternal and child health (MCH) field. This bimonthly provides peer-reviewed papers addressing the following areas of MCH practice, policy, and research: MCH epidemiology, demography, and health status assessment
Innovative MCH service initiatives
Implementation of MCH programs
MCH policy analysis and advocacy
MCH professional development.
Exploring the full spectrum of the MCH field, Maternal and Child Health Journal is an important tool for practitioners as well as academics in public health, obstetrics, gynecology, prenatal medicine, pediatrics, and neonatology.
Sponsors include the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP), the Association of Teachers of Maternal and Child Health (ATMCH), and CityMatCH.