Lawrence C An, Karen S Brown, Allison K C Furgal, Mohammed A Saqib, Farid J Shamo
{"title":"COVID-19大流行对美国州烟草戒烟线的范围和影响的初步和持续影响。","authors":"Lawrence C An, Karen S Brown, Allison K C Furgal, Mohammed A Saqib, Farid J Shamo","doi":"10.18332/tpc/203869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study examines the long-term effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the reach and impact of one US state tobacco quitline while taking into account quitline offers of free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a pre-post analysis from January 2017 through June 2023 of the reach and impact of Michigan's tobacco quitline after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. We assess quitline reach (number of callers per month), effectiveness (self-reported 30-day abstinence at 6 months), and impact (number of new ex-tobacco users per month). We examine the main effects and interactions between pandemic status (i.e. pre vs post March 2020) and quitline offers of free NRT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic had a persistent negative effect on quitline reach (p=0.002) and impact (p<0.001). Abstinence rates decreased transiently during the first year of the pandemic. Offering free NRT had a positive effect on quitline reach (p<0.001) and impact (p<0.001) before and after the start of the pandemic. For quitline reach, we found a significant interaction between pandemic and free NRT effects with a substantial decrease in the mean number of callers per month after the pandemic during months when free NRT is being offered (750; 95% CI: 545-1033, pre-pandemic vs 302; 95% CI: 233-392, post-pandemic) compared to months when free NRT is not being offered (247; 95% CI: 187-327, pre-pandemic vs 159; 95% CI: 114-221, post-pandemic).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a critical need to assess and address the ongoing effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on tobacco quitline reach and impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":44546,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","volume":"11 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12100942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The initial and ongoing effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the reach and impact of a US state tobacco quitline.\",\"authors\":\"Lawrence C An, Karen S Brown, Allison K C Furgal, Mohammed A Saqib, Farid J Shamo\",\"doi\":\"10.18332/tpc/203869\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study examines the long-term effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the reach and impact of one US state tobacco quitline while taking into account quitline offers of free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a pre-post analysis from January 2017 through June 2023 of the reach and impact of Michigan's tobacco quitline after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. We assess quitline reach (number of callers per month), effectiveness (self-reported 30-day abstinence at 6 months), and impact (number of new ex-tobacco users per month). We examine the main effects and interactions between pandemic status (i.e. pre vs post March 2020) and quitline offers of free NRT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic had a persistent negative effect on quitline reach (p=0.002) and impact (p<0.001). Abstinence rates decreased transiently during the first year of the pandemic. Offering free NRT had a positive effect on quitline reach (p<0.001) and impact (p<0.001) before and after the start of the pandemic. For quitline reach, we found a significant interaction between pandemic and free NRT effects with a substantial decrease in the mean number of callers per month after the pandemic during months when free NRT is being offered (750; 95% CI: 545-1033, pre-pandemic vs 302; 95% CI: 233-392, post-pandemic) compared to months when free NRT is not being offered (247; 95% CI: 187-327, pre-pandemic vs 159; 95% CI: 114-221, post-pandemic).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a critical need to assess and address the ongoing effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on tobacco quitline reach and impact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12100942/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/203869\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/203869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The initial and ongoing effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the reach and impact of a US state tobacco quitline.
Introduction: This study examines the long-term effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the reach and impact of one US state tobacco quitline while taking into account quitline offers of free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT).
Methods: This is a pre-post analysis from January 2017 through June 2023 of the reach and impact of Michigan's tobacco quitline after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. We assess quitline reach (number of callers per month), effectiveness (self-reported 30-day abstinence at 6 months), and impact (number of new ex-tobacco users per month). We examine the main effects and interactions between pandemic status (i.e. pre vs post March 2020) and quitline offers of free NRT.
Results: The COVID-19 pandemic had a persistent negative effect on quitline reach (p=0.002) and impact (p<0.001). Abstinence rates decreased transiently during the first year of the pandemic. Offering free NRT had a positive effect on quitline reach (p<0.001) and impact (p<0.001) before and after the start of the pandemic. For quitline reach, we found a significant interaction between pandemic and free NRT effects with a substantial decrease in the mean number of callers per month after the pandemic during months when free NRT is being offered (750; 95% CI: 545-1033, pre-pandemic vs 302; 95% CI: 233-392, post-pandemic) compared to months when free NRT is not being offered (247; 95% CI: 187-327, pre-pandemic vs 159; 95% CI: 114-221, post-pandemic).
Conclusions: There is a critical need to assess and address the ongoing effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on tobacco quitline reach and impact.