Xiang Wang, Jie Huang, Chen Xu, Lili Zhang, Jieakesu Su, Jia Liu, Licheng Shen, Lijuan Luan, Yingyong Hou
{"title":"FGFR3扩增可预测食管鳞状细胞癌患者预后不良。","authors":"Xiang Wang, Jie Huang, Chen Xu, Lili Zhang, Jieakesu Su, Jia Liu, Licheng Shen, Lijuan Luan, Yingyong Hou","doi":"10.1007/s00428-024-03884-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identification and verification of clinically actionable molecular variations to refine currently adopted risk-stratified treatment strategy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is urgently needed. Here, we evaluated FGFR3 amplification status by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) performed on tissue microarrays and its prognostic value in 526 ESCC patients. FGFR3 amplification was found in 3.0% (16/526) of ESCC patients enrolled in this study cohort. Intratumor heterogeneity and metastatic heterogeneity of FGFR3 amplification were found in 10% (2/20) and 40% (2/5) FGFR3 amplified ESCC cases, respectively. No statistically significant associations were found between FGFR3 amplification status and common clinicopathological features. Survival analyses demonstrated that FGFR3 amplification was associated with a worse disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (DFS, P = 0.008; OS, P = 0.027). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that invasive depth was significantly associated with DFS (P = 0.001, HR: 1.498, 95% CI: 1.172-1.914) and OS (P = 0.002, HR: 1.482, 95% CI: 1.159-1.894), and FGFR3 amplification was significantly associated with DFS (P = 0.020, HR: 2.065, 95% CI: 1.120-3.808) and tend to associate with OS (P = 0.070, HR: 1.756, 95% CI: 0.954-3.233). Furthermore, when patients were stratified into stage I-II group and stage III-IV group, the adverse effect of FGFR3 amplification on prognosis was presented in stage III-IV patients (DFS, P = 0.0047; OS, P = 0.029) rather than stage I-II patients (DFS, P = 0.46; OS, P = 0.53), indicating that the prognostic value of FGFR3 amplification may relying on clinical stage. Our findings might provide a better understanding of the FGFR3 amplification status in ESCC patients and add further insights into its potential prognostic value.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":" ","pages":"1153-1164"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FGFR3 amplification is predictive of poor prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.\",\"authors\":\"Xiang Wang, Jie Huang, Chen Xu, Lili Zhang, Jieakesu Su, Jia Liu, Licheng Shen, Lijuan Luan, Yingyong Hou\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00428-024-03884-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Identification and verification of clinically actionable molecular variations to refine currently adopted risk-stratified treatment strategy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is urgently needed. Here, we evaluated FGFR3 amplification status by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) performed on tissue microarrays and its prognostic value in 526 ESCC patients. FGFR3 amplification was found in 3.0% (16/526) of ESCC patients enrolled in this study cohort. Intratumor heterogeneity and metastatic heterogeneity of FGFR3 amplification were found in 10% (2/20) and 40% (2/5) FGFR3 amplified ESCC cases, respectively. No statistically significant associations were found between FGFR3 amplification status and common clinicopathological features. Survival analyses demonstrated that FGFR3 amplification was associated with a worse disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (DFS, P = 0.008; OS, P = 0.027). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that invasive depth was significantly associated with DFS (P = 0.001, HR: 1.498, 95% CI: 1.172-1.914) and OS (P = 0.002, HR: 1.482, 95% CI: 1.159-1.894), and FGFR3 amplification was significantly associated with DFS (P = 0.020, HR: 2.065, 95% CI: 1.120-3.808) and tend to associate with OS (P = 0.070, HR: 1.756, 95% CI: 0.954-3.233). Furthermore, when patients were stratified into stage I-II group and stage III-IV group, the adverse effect of FGFR3 amplification on prognosis was presented in stage III-IV patients (DFS, P = 0.0047; OS, P = 0.029) rather than stage I-II patients (DFS, P = 0.46; OS, P = 0.53), indicating that the prognostic value of FGFR3 amplification may relying on clinical stage. Our findings might provide a better understanding of the FGFR3 amplification status in ESCC patients and add further insights into its potential prognostic value.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1153-1164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03884-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03884-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
迫切需要鉴定和验证临床可操作的分子变异,以完善目前采用的食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)风险分层治疗策略。在这里,我们通过组织微阵列荧光原位杂交(FISH)评估了526例ESCC患者的FGFR3扩增状态及其预后价值。在该研究队列中,3.0%(16/526)的ESCC患者中发现FGFR3扩增。FGFR3扩增在10%(2/20)和40% (2/5)ESCC病例中分别存在肿瘤内异质性和转移性异质性。FGFR3扩增状态与常见临床病理特征之间没有统计学意义的关联。生存分析表明,FGFR3扩增与更差的无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)相关(DFS, P = 0.008;Os, p = 0.027)。单因素和多因素分析显示,侵袭深度与DFS (P = 0.001, HR: 1.498, 95% CI: 1.172 ~ 1.914)和OS (P = 0.002, HR: 1.482, 95% CI: 1.159 ~ 1.894)显著相关,FGFR3扩增与DFS (P = 0.020, HR: 2.065, 95% CI: 1.120 ~ 3.808)显著相关,并倾向于与OS相关(P = 0.070, HR: 1.756, 95% CI: 0.954 ~ 3.233)。此外,当患者被分为I-II期和III-IV期时,FGFR3扩增对III-IV期患者预后的不良影响(DFS, P = 0.0047;OS, P = 0.029),而I-II期患者(DFS, P = 0.46;OS, P = 0.53),提示FGFR3扩增的预后价值可能依赖于临床分期。我们的研究结果可能有助于更好地了解ESCC患者的FGFR3扩增状态,并进一步了解其潜在的预后价值。
FGFR3 amplification is predictive of poor prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.
Identification and verification of clinically actionable molecular variations to refine currently adopted risk-stratified treatment strategy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is urgently needed. Here, we evaluated FGFR3 amplification status by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) performed on tissue microarrays and its prognostic value in 526 ESCC patients. FGFR3 amplification was found in 3.0% (16/526) of ESCC patients enrolled in this study cohort. Intratumor heterogeneity and metastatic heterogeneity of FGFR3 amplification were found in 10% (2/20) and 40% (2/5) FGFR3 amplified ESCC cases, respectively. No statistically significant associations were found between FGFR3 amplification status and common clinicopathological features. Survival analyses demonstrated that FGFR3 amplification was associated with a worse disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (DFS, P = 0.008; OS, P = 0.027). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that invasive depth was significantly associated with DFS (P = 0.001, HR: 1.498, 95% CI: 1.172-1.914) and OS (P = 0.002, HR: 1.482, 95% CI: 1.159-1.894), and FGFR3 amplification was significantly associated with DFS (P = 0.020, HR: 2.065, 95% CI: 1.120-3.808) and tend to associate with OS (P = 0.070, HR: 1.756, 95% CI: 0.954-3.233). Furthermore, when patients were stratified into stage I-II group and stage III-IV group, the adverse effect of FGFR3 amplification on prognosis was presented in stage III-IV patients (DFS, P = 0.0047; OS, P = 0.029) rather than stage I-II patients (DFS, P = 0.46; OS, P = 0.53), indicating that the prognostic value of FGFR3 amplification may relying on clinical stage. Our findings might provide a better understanding of the FGFR3 amplification status in ESCC patients and add further insights into its potential prognostic value.
期刊介绍:
Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.