甲基苯丙胺使用障碍中多步骤计划缺陷的计算机制。

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Claire A Lavalley, Marishka M Mehta, Samuel Taylor, Anne E Chuning, Jennifer L Stewart, Quentin J M Huys, Sahib S Khalsa, Martin P Paulus, Ryan Smith
{"title":"甲基苯丙胺使用障碍中多步骤计划缺陷的计算机制。","authors":"Claire A Lavalley, Marishka M Mehta, Samuel Taylor, Anne E Chuning, Jennifer L Stewart, Quentin J M Huys, Sahib S Khalsa, Martin P Paulus, Ryan Smith","doi":"10.1038/s41398-025-03390-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current theories suggest individuals with methamphetamine use disorder (iMUDs) have difficulty considering long-term outcomes in decision-making, which could contribute to risk of relapse. Aversive interoceptive states (e.g., stress, withdrawal) are also known to increase this risk. The present study analyzed computational mechanisms of planning in iMUDs, and examined the potential impact of an aversive interoceptive state induction. A group of 40 iMUDs and 49 healthy participants completed two runs of a multi-step planning task, with and without an anxiogenic breathing resistance manipulation. Computational modeling revealed that iMUDs had selective difficulty identifying the best overall plan when this required enduring negative short-term outcomes - a mechanism referred to as aversive pruning. Increases in reported craving before and after the induction also predicted greater aversive pruning in iMUDs. These results highlight aversive pruning deficits as a novel mechanism that could promote poor choice in recovering iMUDs and create vulnerability to relapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":23278,"journal":{"name":"Translational Psychiatry","volume":"15 1","pages":"181"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103525/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computational mechanisms underlying multi-step planning deficits in methamphetamine use disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Claire A Lavalley, Marishka M Mehta, Samuel Taylor, Anne E Chuning, Jennifer L Stewart, Quentin J M Huys, Sahib S Khalsa, Martin P Paulus, Ryan Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41398-025-03390-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Current theories suggest individuals with methamphetamine use disorder (iMUDs) have difficulty considering long-term outcomes in decision-making, which could contribute to risk of relapse. Aversive interoceptive states (e.g., stress, withdrawal) are also known to increase this risk. The present study analyzed computational mechanisms of planning in iMUDs, and examined the potential impact of an aversive interoceptive state induction. A group of 40 iMUDs and 49 healthy participants completed two runs of a multi-step planning task, with and without an anxiogenic breathing resistance manipulation. Computational modeling revealed that iMUDs had selective difficulty identifying the best overall plan when this required enduring negative short-term outcomes - a mechanism referred to as aversive pruning. Increases in reported craving before and after the induction also predicted greater aversive pruning in iMUDs. These results highlight aversive pruning deficits as a novel mechanism that could promote poor choice in recovering iMUDs and create vulnerability to relapse.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103525/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-025-03390-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-025-03390-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前的理论表明,患有甲基苯丙胺使用障碍(imud)的个体在决策时难以考虑长期结果,这可能会增加复发的风险。厌恶的内感受状态(如压力、退缩)也会增加这种风险。本研究分析了imud中规划的计算机制,并考察了厌恶内感受状态诱导的潜在影响。一组40名imud患者和49名健康参与者完成了两组多步骤计划任务,有和没有焦虑性呼吸阻力操作。计算模型显示,当需要承受短期负面结果时,imud在确定最佳总体计划方面存在选择性困难——这种机制被称为厌恶修剪。诱导前后报告的渴望增加也预示着imud更大的厌恶修剪。这些结果强调了厌恶修剪缺陷作为一种新机制,可以促进imud恢复时的不良选择,并产生复发的脆弱性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Computational mechanisms underlying multi-step planning deficits in methamphetamine use disorder.

Current theories suggest individuals with methamphetamine use disorder (iMUDs) have difficulty considering long-term outcomes in decision-making, which could contribute to risk of relapse. Aversive interoceptive states (e.g., stress, withdrawal) are also known to increase this risk. The present study analyzed computational mechanisms of planning in iMUDs, and examined the potential impact of an aversive interoceptive state induction. A group of 40 iMUDs and 49 healthy participants completed two runs of a multi-step planning task, with and without an anxiogenic breathing resistance manipulation. Computational modeling revealed that iMUDs had selective difficulty identifying the best overall plan when this required enduring negative short-term outcomes - a mechanism referred to as aversive pruning. Increases in reported craving before and after the induction also predicted greater aversive pruning in iMUDs. These results highlight aversive pruning deficits as a novel mechanism that could promote poor choice in recovering iMUDs and create vulnerability to relapse.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatry has suffered tremendously by the limited translational pipeline. Nobel laureate Julius Axelrod''s discovery in 1961 of monoamine reuptake by pre-synaptic neurons still forms the basis of contemporary antidepressant treatment. There is a grievous gap between the explosion of knowledge in neuroscience and conceptually novel treatments for our patients. Translational Psychiatry bridges this gap by fostering and highlighting the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health. We view translation broadly as the full spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health, inclusive. The steps of translation that are within the scope of Translational Psychiatry include (i) fundamental discovery, (ii) bench to bedside, (iii) bedside to clinical applications (clinical trials), (iv) translation to policy and health care guidelines, (v) assessment of health policy and usage, and (vi) global health. All areas of medical research, including — but not restricted to — molecular biology, genetics, pharmacology, imaging and epidemiology are welcome as they contribute to enhance the field of translational psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信