妊娠试验在育龄妇女慢性疼痛管理中的应用。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-05-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S510703
Shoran Tamura, Swarnima Vardhan, Kathryn Breidenbach, Naum Shaparin, Amaresh Vydyanathan, Karina Gritsenko
{"title":"妊娠试验在育龄妇女慢性疼痛管理中的应用。","authors":"Shoran Tamura, Swarnima Vardhan, Kathryn Breidenbach, Naum Shaparin, Amaresh Vydyanathan, Karina Gritsenko","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S510703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Women of childbearing age often require a nuanced and individualized approach to chronic pain management, especially when pregnancy is a possibility. Interventional procedures involving ionizing radiation, such as fluoroscopy-guided injections, raise specific concerns for fetal safety, including risks of embryo death, congenital anomalies, intellectual disability, and microcephaly. Despite national recommendations from organizations like the American College of Radiology (ACR), implementation of pregnancy screening in the pain management context remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review synthesizes current literature and practice guidelines to assess the gaps in pregnancy screening protocols within chronic pain management settings. It highlights challenges in evaluating pregnancy status before initiating pharmacologic or fluoroscopic procedures, and it examines both biological testing limitations and procedural risks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fluoroscopically guided procedures may exceed the teratogenic radiation threshold of 50 mGy, underscoring the critical need for reliable pregnancy screening. While urine and serum hCG tests are widely used, both are susceptible to false negatives and positives due to timing, hormone variants, and analytical interferences. Integrating clinical evaluation with menstrual history, point-of-care testing, and serum confirmation may improve diagnostic accuracy and ensure greater protection for the fetus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and recommendations: </strong>To address safety concerns, this review proposes a structured pregnancy screening algorithm tailored for chronic pain practices. Key recommendations include: routine screening of all reproductive-age women prior to procedures involving radiation or teratogenic medications, use of serum hCG testing when uncertainty exists, optimizing radiation exposure strategies, and clear, informed consent processes outlining fetal risks. Adoption of these best practices may improve clinical consistency and enhance patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"2605-2612"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103869/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating Pregnancy Testing in Chronic Pain Management for Women of Reproductive Age.\",\"authors\":\"Shoran Tamura, Swarnima Vardhan, Kathryn Breidenbach, Naum Shaparin, Amaresh Vydyanathan, Karina Gritsenko\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S510703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Women of childbearing age often require a nuanced and individualized approach to chronic pain management, especially when pregnancy is a possibility. Interventional procedures involving ionizing radiation, such as fluoroscopy-guided injections, raise specific concerns for fetal safety, including risks of embryo death, congenital anomalies, intellectual disability, and microcephaly. Despite national recommendations from organizations like the American College of Radiology (ACR), implementation of pregnancy screening in the pain management context remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review synthesizes current literature and practice guidelines to assess the gaps in pregnancy screening protocols within chronic pain management settings. It highlights challenges in evaluating pregnancy status before initiating pharmacologic or fluoroscopic procedures, and it examines both biological testing limitations and procedural risks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fluoroscopically guided procedures may exceed the teratogenic radiation threshold of 50 mGy, underscoring the critical need for reliable pregnancy screening. While urine and serum hCG tests are widely used, both are susceptible to false negatives and positives due to timing, hormone variants, and analytical interferences. Integrating clinical evaluation with menstrual history, point-of-care testing, and serum confirmation may improve diagnostic accuracy and ensure greater protection for the fetus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and recommendations: </strong>To address safety concerns, this review proposes a structured pregnancy screening algorithm tailored for chronic pain practices. Key recommendations include: routine screening of all reproductive-age women prior to procedures involving radiation or teratogenic medications, use of serum hCG testing when uncertainty exists, optimizing radiation exposure strategies, and clear, informed consent processes outlining fetal risks. Adoption of these best practices may improve clinical consistency and enhance patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"2605-2612\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103869/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S510703\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S510703","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:育龄妇女通常需要一种细致入微的个性化方法来管理慢性疼痛,特别是当怀孕是可能的。涉及电离辐射的介入手术,如透视引导下的注射,引起了对胎儿安全的特别关注,包括胚胎死亡、先天性异常、智力残疾和小头畸形的风险。尽管美国放射学会(ACR)等组织提出了全国性建议,但妊娠筛查在疼痛管理方面的实施仍然有限。方法:本综述综合了目前的文献和实践指南,以评估在慢性疼痛管理设置妊娠筛查方案的差距。它强调了在开始药理学或透视程序之前评估妊娠状况的挑战,并检查了生物学测试的局限性和程序风险。结果:透视引导的程序可能超过致畸辐射阈值50 mGy,强调了可靠的妊娠筛查的迫切需要。虽然尿液和血清hCG测试被广泛使用,但由于时间、激素变异和分析干扰,两者都容易出现假阴性和假阳性。将临床评估与月经史、即时检查和血清确认相结合可以提高诊断的准确性,并确保对胎儿的更好保护。结论和建议:为了解决安全问题,本综述提出了一种针对慢性疼痛实践的结构化妊娠筛查算法。主要建议包括:在涉及辐射或致畸药物的手术前对所有育龄妇女进行常规筛查,在存在不确定性时使用血清hCG检测,优化辐射暴露策略,以及明确的知情同意程序,概述胎儿风险。采用这些最佳做法可提高临床一致性并增强患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigating Pregnancy Testing in Chronic Pain Management for Women of Reproductive Age.

Background: Women of childbearing age often require a nuanced and individualized approach to chronic pain management, especially when pregnancy is a possibility. Interventional procedures involving ionizing radiation, such as fluoroscopy-guided injections, raise specific concerns for fetal safety, including risks of embryo death, congenital anomalies, intellectual disability, and microcephaly. Despite national recommendations from organizations like the American College of Radiology (ACR), implementation of pregnancy screening in the pain management context remains limited.

Methods: This review synthesizes current literature and practice guidelines to assess the gaps in pregnancy screening protocols within chronic pain management settings. It highlights challenges in evaluating pregnancy status before initiating pharmacologic or fluoroscopic procedures, and it examines both biological testing limitations and procedural risks.

Results: Fluoroscopically guided procedures may exceed the teratogenic radiation threshold of 50 mGy, underscoring the critical need for reliable pregnancy screening. While urine and serum hCG tests are widely used, both are susceptible to false negatives and positives due to timing, hormone variants, and analytical interferences. Integrating clinical evaluation with menstrual history, point-of-care testing, and serum confirmation may improve diagnostic accuracy and ensure greater protection for the fetus.

Conclusion and recommendations: To address safety concerns, this review proposes a structured pregnancy screening algorithm tailored for chronic pain practices. Key recommendations include: routine screening of all reproductive-age women prior to procedures involving radiation or teratogenic medications, use of serum hCG testing when uncertainty exists, optimizing radiation exposure strategies, and clear, informed consent processes outlining fetal risks. Adoption of these best practices may improve clinical consistency and enhance patient safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信