灌注错配比在颅内动脉粥样硬化性疾病相关闭塞诊断中的价值。

IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Tingyu Yi, Zhi-Nan Pan, Lan Hong, Weifeng Huang, Ding-Lai Lin, Zhijiao He, Shuyi Liu, Shujuan Gan, Fenglong Lang, Yi-Ning Yang, Jinhua Ye, Huanghuang Chen, Dapeng Sun, Xin Cheng, Zhongrong Miao, Wen-Huo Chen
{"title":"灌注错配比在颅内动脉粥样硬化性疾病相关闭塞诊断中的价值。","authors":"Tingyu Yi, Zhi-Nan Pan, Lan Hong, Weifeng Huang, Ding-Lai Lin, Zhijiao He, Shuyi Liu, Shujuan Gan, Fenglong Lang, Yi-Ning Yang, Jinhua Ye, Huanghuang Chen, Dapeng Sun, Xin Cheng, Zhongrong Miao, Wen-Huo Chen","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2025-023205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ability to differentiate intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) related large vessel occlusion (LVO) from embolism is critical for stroke management. We hypothesized that the mismatch ratio derived from the automated computed tomography perfusion (CTP) could predict underlying ICAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and LVO from prospective registry databases who underwent CTP were included in the derivation cohort (n=1100). The mismatch ratio, calculated as the ratio of the hypo-perfused volume to the infarct core volume by software, was defined. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the predictive performance of the mismatch ratio for ICAD, and logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of LVO associated with underlying ICAD. External validation was conducted using cohorts from two other stroke centers (n=385).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the derivation cohort, 390 patients were classified as ICAD and 720 as embolism. The ICAD group had a higher mismatch ratio (9.8 vs 3.6, P<0.001). The mismatch ratio outperformed age and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score in predicting ICAD (area under the curve (AUC), 0.77 vs 0.36 vs 0.28, P<0.001). The ROC curve had a best cut-off of 7.1 for predicting ICAD, which was an independent predictor of ICAD-related occlusion (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 5.43, 95% CI 3.68 to 8.03), with 68% sensitivity and 76% specificity. These results were validated in an external cohort (AUC=0.78; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.83).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The perfusion mismatch ratio may be an optimal and simple predictor of anterior circulation ICAD- related LVO before endovascular treatment (EVT). When this ratio was ≥7.1, ICAD was five times more likely than embolism.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic value of the perfusion mismatch ratio in identifying intracranial atherosclerotic disease related occlusion.\",\"authors\":\"Tingyu Yi, Zhi-Nan Pan, Lan Hong, Weifeng Huang, Ding-Lai Lin, Zhijiao He, Shuyi Liu, Shujuan Gan, Fenglong Lang, Yi-Ning Yang, Jinhua Ye, Huanghuang Chen, Dapeng Sun, Xin Cheng, Zhongrong Miao, Wen-Huo Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jnis-2025-023205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ability to differentiate intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) related large vessel occlusion (LVO) from embolism is critical for stroke management. We hypothesized that the mismatch ratio derived from the automated computed tomography perfusion (CTP) could predict underlying ICAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and LVO from prospective registry databases who underwent CTP were included in the derivation cohort (n=1100). The mismatch ratio, calculated as the ratio of the hypo-perfused volume to the infarct core volume by software, was defined. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the predictive performance of the mismatch ratio for ICAD, and logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of LVO associated with underlying ICAD. External validation was conducted using cohorts from two other stroke centers (n=385).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the derivation cohort, 390 patients were classified as ICAD and 720 as embolism. The ICAD group had a higher mismatch ratio (9.8 vs 3.6, P<0.001). The mismatch ratio outperformed age and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score in predicting ICAD (area under the curve (AUC), 0.77 vs 0.36 vs 0.28, P<0.001). The ROC curve had a best cut-off of 7.1 for predicting ICAD, which was an independent predictor of ICAD-related occlusion (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 5.43, 95% CI 3.68 to 8.03), with 68% sensitivity and 76% specificity. These results were validated in an external cohort (AUC=0.78; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.83).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The perfusion mismatch ratio may be an optimal and simple predictor of anterior circulation ICAD- related LVO before endovascular treatment (EVT). When this ratio was ≥7.1, ICAD was five times more likely than embolism.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-023205\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-023205","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:区分颅内动脉粥样硬化性疾病(ICAD)相关的大血管闭塞(LVO)与栓塞的能力对卒中管理至关重要。我们假设自动计算机断层扫描灌注(CTP)得出的失配比可以预测潜在的ICAD。方法:将前瞻性登记数据库中接受CTP治疗的急性缺血性卒中(AIS)和LVO患者纳入衍生队列(n=1100)。定义错配率,通过软件计算为低灌注体积与梗死核心体积之比。采用受试者工作特征(Receiver Operating Characteristic, ROC)分析评估失配率对ICAD的预测效果,并采用logistic回归分析确定与潜在ICAD相关的LVO独立预测因子。外部验证使用来自其他两个卒中中心的队列进行(n=385)。结果:衍生队列中,390例为ICAD, 720例为栓塞。结论:灌注失配比可能是血管内治疗(EVT)前前循环ICAD相关LVO的最佳和简单预测指标。当该比值≥7.1时,ICAD发生的可能性是栓塞的5倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic value of the perfusion mismatch ratio in identifying intracranial atherosclerotic disease related occlusion.

Background: The ability to differentiate intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) related large vessel occlusion (LVO) from embolism is critical for stroke management. We hypothesized that the mismatch ratio derived from the automated computed tomography perfusion (CTP) could predict underlying ICAD.

Methods: Patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and LVO from prospective registry databases who underwent CTP were included in the derivation cohort (n=1100). The mismatch ratio, calculated as the ratio of the hypo-perfused volume to the infarct core volume by software, was defined. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the predictive performance of the mismatch ratio for ICAD, and logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of LVO associated with underlying ICAD. External validation was conducted using cohorts from two other stroke centers (n=385).

Results: In the derivation cohort, 390 patients were classified as ICAD and 720 as embolism. The ICAD group had a higher mismatch ratio (9.8 vs 3.6, P<0.001). The mismatch ratio outperformed age and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score in predicting ICAD (area under the curve (AUC), 0.77 vs 0.36 vs 0.28, P<0.001). The ROC curve had a best cut-off of 7.1 for predicting ICAD, which was an independent predictor of ICAD-related occlusion (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 5.43, 95% CI 3.68 to 8.03), with 68% sensitivity and 76% specificity. These results were validated in an external cohort (AUC=0.78; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.83).

Conclusion: The perfusion mismatch ratio may be an optimal and simple predictor of anterior circulation ICAD- related LVO before endovascular treatment (EVT). When this ratio was ≥7.1, ICAD was five times more likely than embolism.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信