Divya Siddalingappa, Vivek Reddy, Ashwath S Nayak, Arun S Urala, Kalyana C Pentapati
{"title":"孤立体系统的效率和患者报告的结果：随机对照试验的系统评价。","authors":"Divya Siddalingappa, Vivek Reddy, Ashwath S Nayak, Arun S Urala, Kalyana C Pentapati","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/objectives: </strong>The Isolite system is a device designed for moisture control during dental procedures while improving access, visibility, and patient comfort. This systematic review evaluated the efficiency and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of the Isolite system through a comprehensive analysis of randomized trials.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Electronic searches of Scopus, Embase, Medline, and Web of Science databases were conducted in March 2023 for relevant papers published in the English language. PROSPERO CRD42023428634.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Randomized studies that explored the efficacy and patient-centered outcomes of comfort and acceptance while using Isolite were included. Study quality was assessed based on the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool. A total of five studies that examined 170 patients were included in the review.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The quality of evidence was rated as low due to the limited number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the high risk of bias in the included studies. Most studies reported that the Isolite system was as effective as rubber dams or cotton rolls for isolation and moisture control while reducing chair time. Patient comfort assessments indicated more participants favored the Isolite system with a significant reduction in the need to gag and a lower incidence of taste perception compared to cotton roll isolation. Based on the limited evidence available, there is low-level evidence that the Isolite system is as effective as traditional isolation techniques.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Isolite may offer advantages in terms of efficiency and patient comfort compared to conventional isolation techniques and has the potential to improve dental interventions, enhancing the overall dental experience for practitioners and patients.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023428634.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Siddalingappa D, Reddy V, Nayak AS, <i>et al</i>. Efficiency and Patient-reported Outcomes for Isolite System: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(3):331-338.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"18 3","pages":"331-338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096859/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency and Patient-reported Outcomes for Isolite System: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Divya Siddalingappa, Vivek Reddy, Ashwath S Nayak, Arun S Urala, Kalyana C Pentapati\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction/objectives: </strong>The Isolite system is a device designed for moisture control during dental procedures while improving access, visibility, and patient comfort. This systematic review evaluated the efficiency and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of the Isolite system through a comprehensive analysis of randomized trials.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Electronic searches of Scopus, Embase, Medline, and Web of Science databases were conducted in March 2023 for relevant papers published in the English language. PROSPERO CRD42023428634.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Randomized studies that explored the efficacy and patient-centered outcomes of comfort and acceptance while using Isolite were included. Study quality was assessed based on the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool. A total of five studies that examined 170 patients were included in the review.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The quality of evidence was rated as low due to the limited number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the high risk of bias in the included studies. Most studies reported that the Isolite system was as effective as rubber dams or cotton rolls for isolation and moisture control while reducing chair time. Patient comfort assessments indicated more participants favored the Isolite system with a significant reduction in the need to gag and a lower incidence of taste perception compared to cotton roll isolation. Based on the limited evidence available, there is low-level evidence that the Isolite system is as effective as traditional isolation techniques.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Isolite may offer advantages in terms of efficiency and patient comfort compared to conventional isolation techniques and has the potential to improve dental interventions, enhancing the overall dental experience for practitioners and patients.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023428634.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Siddalingappa D, Reddy V, Nayak AS, <i>et al</i>. Efficiency and Patient-reported Outcomes for Isolite System: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(3):331-338.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"331-338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096859/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介/目的：Isolite系统是一种设计用于在牙科手术过程中控制湿度的设备，同时提高了可及性、可视性和患者舒适度。本系统综述通过对随机试验的综合分析，评估了Isolite系统的效率和患者报告的结果（PROs）。数据来源：于2023年3月电子检索Scopus、Embase、Medline、Web of Science数据库中已发表的相关英文论文。普洛斯彼罗CRD42023428634。研究选择：纳入随机研究，探讨使用Isolite时的疗效和以患者为中心的舒适度和接受度。研究质量根据修订后的Cochrane偏倚风险工具进行评估。总共有5项研究对170名患者进行了检查。结论：由于随机对照试验（RCTs）数量有限，且纳入的研究存在较高的偏倚风险，本研究的证据质量较低。大多数研究报告说，在减少椅子时间的同时，孤立体系统在隔离和控制湿度方面与橡胶坝或棉卷一样有效。患者舒适度评估表明，与棉卷隔离相比，更多的参与者更喜欢Isolite系统，因为它显著减少了呕吐的需要，而且味觉感知的发生率更低。根据现有的有限证据，有低水平的证据表明，孤立体系统与传统的隔离技术一样有效。临床意义：与传统的隔离技术相比，孤立体在效率和患者舒适度方面可能具有优势，并有可能改善牙科干预，增强从业者和患者的整体牙科体验。系统评价注册：PROSPERO CRD42023428634。本文引用方式：Siddalingappa D， Reddy V， Nayak AS等。孤立体系统的效率和患者报告的结果：随机对照试验的系统评价。中华临床儿科杂志，2015;18(3):331-338。
Efficiency and Patient-reported Outcomes for Isolite System: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Introduction/objectives: The Isolite system is a device designed for moisture control during dental procedures while improving access, visibility, and patient comfort. This systematic review evaluated the efficiency and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of the Isolite system through a comprehensive analysis of randomized trials.
Data sources: Electronic searches of Scopus, Embase, Medline, and Web of Science databases were conducted in March 2023 for relevant papers published in the English language. PROSPERO CRD42023428634.
Study selection: Randomized studies that explored the efficacy and patient-centered outcomes of comfort and acceptance while using Isolite were included. Study quality was assessed based on the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool. A total of five studies that examined 170 patients were included in the review.
Conclusion: The quality of evidence was rated as low due to the limited number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the high risk of bias in the included studies. Most studies reported that the Isolite system was as effective as rubber dams or cotton rolls for isolation and moisture control while reducing chair time. Patient comfort assessments indicated more participants favored the Isolite system with a significant reduction in the need to gag and a lower incidence of taste perception compared to cotton roll isolation. Based on the limited evidence available, there is low-level evidence that the Isolite system is as effective as traditional isolation techniques.
Clinical significance: Isolite may offer advantages in terms of efficiency and patient comfort compared to conventional isolation techniques and has the potential to improve dental interventions, enhancing the overall dental experience for practitioners and patients.
How to cite this article: Siddalingappa D, Reddy V, Nayak AS, et al. Efficiency and Patient-reported Outcomes for Isolite System: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(3):331-338.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
