高b值弥散加权成像识别乳腺良恶性病变的准确性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-27 DOI:10.1080/14737140.2025.2510532
Jupeng Zhang, Qi Wu, Xiqi Zhu, Baosheng Li
{"title":"高b值弥散加权成像识别乳腺良恶性病变的准确性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Jupeng Zhang, Qi Wu, Xiqi Zhu, Baosheng Li","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2510532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science for English-language studies on high b-value DWI in breast lesions, from inception to June 2024. Study quality was assessed, and data were extracted. Heterogeneity analysis, forest plots, Deek's funnel plots, and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were generated using Stata 16.0 and Meta-Disc 1.4 software. Meta-regression identified sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included 12 studies with 1,747 patients and 1,861 breast lesions (1,000 malignant, 861 benign). Pooled diagnostic metrics were: sensitivity, 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.94); specificity, 0.93 (95% CI: 0.87-0.96); positive likelihood ratio, 12.21 (95% CI: 6.91-21.57); negative likelihood ratio, 0.09 (95% CI: 0.06-0.14); diagnostic odds ratio, 130.75 (95% CI: 56.95-300.21); and AUC, 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-0.98).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High b-value DWI has high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions, demonstrating potential as a reliable imaging marker.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO (CRD42024568777).</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"809-819"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging in identifying benign and malignant breast lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jupeng Zhang, Qi Wu, Xiqi Zhu, Baosheng Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737140.2025.2510532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science for English-language studies on high b-value DWI in breast lesions, from inception to June 2024. Study quality was assessed, and data were extracted. Heterogeneity analysis, forest plots, Deek's funnel plots, and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were generated using Stata 16.0 and Meta-Disc 1.4 software. Meta-regression identified sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included 12 studies with 1,747 patients and 1,861 breast lesions (1,000 malignant, 861 benign). Pooled diagnostic metrics were: sensitivity, 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.94); specificity, 0.93 (95% CI: 0.87-0.96); positive likelihood ratio, 12.21 (95% CI: 6.91-21.57); negative likelihood ratio, 0.09 (95% CI: 0.06-0.14); diagnostic odds ratio, 130.75 (95% CI: 56.95-300.21); and AUC, 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-0.98).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High b-value DWI has high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions, demonstrating potential as a reliable imaging marker.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO (CRD42024568777).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"809-819\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2510532\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2510532","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨高b值弥散加权成像(DWI)对乳腺良恶性病变的鉴别诊断价值。方法:综合检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Scopus和Web of Science,检索自成立至2024年6月期间关于乳腺病变高b值DWI的英文研究。评估研究质量,提取数据。采用Stata 16.0和Meta-Disc 1.4软件生成异质性分析、森林图、Deek漏斗图和综合受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线。元回归确定了异质性的来源。结果:荟萃分析包括12项研究,1747例患者和1861例乳腺病变(1000例恶性,861例良性)。合并诊断指标为:敏感性,0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.94);特异性为0.93 (95% CI: 0.87-0.96);阳性似然比为12.21 (95% CI: 6.91 ~ 21.57);负似然比,0.09 (95% CI: 0.06-0.14);诊断优势比为130.75 (95% CI: 56.95-300.21);AUC为0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-0.98)。结论:高b值DWI在鉴别乳腺良恶性病变方面具有较高的诊断准确性,可作为可靠的影像学标志物。报名:普洛斯彼罗(CRD42024568777)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy of high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging in identifying benign and malignant breast lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science for English-language studies on high b-value DWI in breast lesions, from inception to June 2024. Study quality was assessed, and data were extracted. Heterogeneity analysis, forest plots, Deek's funnel plots, and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were generated using Stata 16.0 and Meta-Disc 1.4 software. Meta-regression identified sources of heterogeneity.

Results: The meta-analysis included 12 studies with 1,747 patients and 1,861 breast lesions (1,000 malignant, 861 benign). Pooled diagnostic metrics were: sensitivity, 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.94); specificity, 0.93 (95% CI: 0.87-0.96); positive likelihood ratio, 12.21 (95% CI: 6.91-21.57); negative likelihood ratio, 0.09 (95% CI: 0.06-0.14); diagnostic odds ratio, 130.75 (95% CI: 56.95-300.21); and AUC, 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-0.98).

Conclusion: High b-value DWI has high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions, demonstrating potential as a reliable imaging marker.

Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42024568777).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches. Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信