腹膜恶性肿瘤细胞减少手术和腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)国家指南:一项全球系统评价和强度分析建议。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-24 DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-17518-z
Marco Tonello, Carola Cenzi, Elisa Pizzolato, Manuela Martini, Pierluigi Pilati, Antonio Sommariva
{"title":"腹膜恶性肿瘤细胞减少手术和腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)国家指南:一项全球系统评价和强度分析建议。","authors":"Marco Tonello, Carola Cenzi, Elisa Pizzolato, Manuela Martini, Pierluigi Pilati, Antonio Sommariva","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-17518-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>National guidelines (GLs) for surgical cytoreduction (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the management of peritoneal malignancies (PMs) vary across countries, scientific societies, and government agencies. This study aimed to systematically review and compare the recommendations for CRS/HIPEC in the treatment of ovarian cancer (EOC), gastric cancer, colorectal cancer (CRC), mesothelioma, and pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical databases, search engines, and national websites of 193 countries were queried using artificial intelligence (AI)-powered software for scientific societies and/or government agencies guidelines. The study excluded consensus statements and guidelines without appropriate references. Non-English guidelines were translated, and data, including GRADE strength of recommendations, were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study analyzed 138 guidelines, 24 for gastric cancer, 36 for colorectal cancer, 29 for primary ovarian cancer (p-)EOC, 28 for recurrent ovarian cancer (r-)EOC, 10 for mesothelioma, and 11 for PMP. Guidelines were retrieved from 51 (26.4%) nations, mostly from developed countries (62.1%; p < 0.001). The CRS procedure received robust positive recommendations (GRADE I/IIa) for CRC (74.2%), p-/r-EOC (100%/78.5%), PMP (90.9%), and mesothelioma (90.0%). Conversely, CRS was not indicated for gastric cancer (61.6%, GRADE III; p < 0.001). The HIPEC procedure had robust positive recommendations for PMP (90.9%) and mesothelioma (90.0%), but was controversial for p-EOC (42.3%) and CRC (38.0%) and contraindicated for r-EOC (80.0%) and gastric cancer (62.4%) (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>National guidelines concordantly recommend CRS for colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer, PMP, and mesothelioma. In contrast, HIPEC recommendations are less homogeneously shared, except for PMP and mesothelioma. No positive concordance exists among guidelines on gastric cancer for CRS nor HIPEC. Furthermore, high-level evidence is needed to strengthen future guidelines on peritoneal metastases.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"5795-5806"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222385/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National Guidelines for Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in Peritoneal Malignancies: A Worldwide Systematic Review and Recommendations of Strength Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Tonello, Carola Cenzi, Elisa Pizzolato, Manuela Martini, Pierluigi Pilati, Antonio Sommariva\",\"doi\":\"10.1245/s10434-025-17518-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>National guidelines (GLs) for surgical cytoreduction (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the management of peritoneal malignancies (PMs) vary across countries, scientific societies, and government agencies. This study aimed to systematically review and compare the recommendations for CRS/HIPEC in the treatment of ovarian cancer (EOC), gastric cancer, colorectal cancer (CRC), mesothelioma, and pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical databases, search engines, and national websites of 193 countries were queried using artificial intelligence (AI)-powered software for scientific societies and/or government agencies guidelines. The study excluded consensus statements and guidelines without appropriate references. Non-English guidelines were translated, and data, including GRADE strength of recommendations, were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study analyzed 138 guidelines, 24 for gastric cancer, 36 for colorectal cancer, 29 for primary ovarian cancer (p-)EOC, 28 for recurrent ovarian cancer (r-)EOC, 10 for mesothelioma, and 11 for PMP. Guidelines were retrieved from 51 (26.4%) nations, mostly from developed countries (62.1%; p < 0.001). The CRS procedure received robust positive recommendations (GRADE I/IIa) for CRC (74.2%), p-/r-EOC (100%/78.5%), PMP (90.9%), and mesothelioma (90.0%). Conversely, CRS was not indicated for gastric cancer (61.6%, GRADE III; p < 0.001). The HIPEC procedure had robust positive recommendations for PMP (90.9%) and mesothelioma (90.0%), but was controversial for p-EOC (42.3%) and CRC (38.0%) and contraindicated for r-EOC (80.0%) and gastric cancer (62.4%) (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>National guidelines concordantly recommend CRS for colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer, PMP, and mesothelioma. In contrast, HIPEC recommendations are less homogeneously shared, except for PMP and mesothelioma. No positive concordance exists among guidelines on gastric cancer for CRS nor HIPEC. Furthermore, high-level evidence is needed to strengthen future guidelines on peritoneal metastases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"5795-5806\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222385/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17518-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17518-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在腹膜恶性肿瘤(pm)的治疗中,手术细胞减少(CRS)和腹腔内热化疗(HIPEC)的国家指南(GLs)因国家、科学学会和政府机构的不同而不同。本研究旨在系统回顾和比较CRS/HIPEC治疗卵巢癌(EOC)、胃癌、结直肠癌(CRC)、间皮瘤和腹膜假性黏液瘤(PMP)的推荐方案。方法:使用人工智能(AI)驱动的软件为科学学会和/或政府机构指南查询193个国家的医学数据库、搜索引擎和国家网站。该研究排除了没有适当参考的共识声明和指南。翻译非英语指南,并提取包括GRADE推荐强度在内的数据。结果:本研究分析了138份指南,其中24份针对胃癌,36份针对结直肠癌,29份针对原发性卵巢癌(p-)EOC, 28份针对复发性卵巢癌(r-)EOC, 10份针对间皮瘤,11份针对PMP。从51个(26.4%)国家检索指南,主要来自发达国家(62.1%);P < 0.001)。CRS程序在CRC (74.2%), p-/r-EOC (100%/78.5%), PMP(90.9%)和间皮瘤(90.0%)中获得了强有力的阳性推荐(I/IIa级)。相反,CRS不适用于胃癌(61.6%,III级;P < 0.001)。HIPEC对PMP(90.9%)和间皮瘤(90.0%)有强烈的阳性推荐,但对p- eoc(42.3%)和CRC(38.0%)有争议,对r-EOC(80.0%)和胃癌(62.4%)有禁忌(p < 0.001)。结论:国家指南一致推荐CRS用于结直肠癌、卵巢癌、PMP和间皮瘤。相比之下,除了PMP和间皮瘤外,HIPEC的建议不太一致。CRS和HIPEC的胃癌指南之间没有正面的一致性。此外,需要高水平的证据来加强腹膜转移的未来指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
National Guidelines for Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in Peritoneal Malignancies: A Worldwide Systematic Review and Recommendations of Strength Analysis.

Background: National guidelines (GLs) for surgical cytoreduction (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the management of peritoneal malignancies (PMs) vary across countries, scientific societies, and government agencies. This study aimed to systematically review and compare the recommendations for CRS/HIPEC in the treatment of ovarian cancer (EOC), gastric cancer, colorectal cancer (CRC), mesothelioma, and pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP).

Methods: Medical databases, search engines, and national websites of 193 countries were queried using artificial intelligence (AI)-powered software for scientific societies and/or government agencies guidelines. The study excluded consensus statements and guidelines without appropriate references. Non-English guidelines were translated, and data, including GRADE strength of recommendations, were extracted.

Results: The study analyzed 138 guidelines, 24 for gastric cancer, 36 for colorectal cancer, 29 for primary ovarian cancer (p-)EOC, 28 for recurrent ovarian cancer (r-)EOC, 10 for mesothelioma, and 11 for PMP. Guidelines were retrieved from 51 (26.4%) nations, mostly from developed countries (62.1%; p < 0.001). The CRS procedure received robust positive recommendations (GRADE I/IIa) for CRC (74.2%), p-/r-EOC (100%/78.5%), PMP (90.9%), and mesothelioma (90.0%). Conversely, CRS was not indicated for gastric cancer (61.6%, GRADE III; p < 0.001). The HIPEC procedure had robust positive recommendations for PMP (90.9%) and mesothelioma (90.0%), but was controversial for p-EOC (42.3%) and CRC (38.0%) and contraindicated for r-EOC (80.0%) and gastric cancer (62.4%) (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: National guidelines concordantly recommend CRS for colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer, PMP, and mesothelioma. In contrast, HIPEC recommendations are less homogeneously shared, except for PMP and mesothelioma. No positive concordance exists among guidelines on gastric cancer for CRS nor HIPEC. Furthermore, high-level evidence is needed to strengthen future guidelines on peritoneal metastases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信