食虫蝙蝠和飞虫对不同光谱实验LED照明的不同反应

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecosphere Pub Date : 2025-05-27 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70291
Kylie A. Robert, Alicia M. Dimovski, Peter Contos, Nyil Khwaja, Stephen R. Griffiths
{"title":"食虫蝙蝠和飞虫对不同光谱实验LED照明的不同反应","authors":"Kylie A. Robert,&nbsp;Alicia M. Dimovski,&nbsp;Peter Contos,&nbsp;Nyil Khwaja,&nbsp;Stephen R. Griffiths","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Artificial light at night poses a global threat to biodiversity and is increasing at a rate greater than any other pollutant. We conducted a field experiment to investigate the effects of short-term nighttime illumination on nocturnal flying insects and insectivorous bats in previously unlit remnant bushland. We compared these organisms' responses to three types of light-emitting diode (LED) lights, each with a unique spectral composition (cool white [CW], λ<i>P</i> 457 nm; filtered white [FW], λ<i>P</i> 586 nm; and amber [A], λ<i>P</i> 601 nm), as well as a control (C) group without illumination. Our findings revealed that both CW and FW LEDs significantly increased the total activity of flying insects, particularly the orders Diptera, Coleoptera, and Hymenoptera. By contrast, total bat activity was independent of light treatment, but there was a marginally non-significant effect on bats presumed to be light sensitive. Amber lights appear to mitigate the disruptive effects of light on at least one light sensitive bat species. Intriguingly, despite a positive association in one bat species with insect abundance, there was no corresponding increase in feeding activity around illuminated sites in this or any other species. These observations suggest that bats may not solely exploit the attraction of insects to LED lights as a feeding resource and that those species that persist in these environments are perhaps more light tolerant than light exploitive. Overall, our study highlights potentially complex responses of Australian insectivorous bats and flying insects to short-term LED lighting and contributes further insights into the ecological consequences of nighttime lighting.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"16 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70291","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Divergent responses of insectivorous bats and flying insects to experimental LED illumination of different spectra\",\"authors\":\"Kylie A. Robert,&nbsp;Alicia M. Dimovski,&nbsp;Peter Contos,&nbsp;Nyil Khwaja,&nbsp;Stephen R. Griffiths\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecs2.70291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Artificial light at night poses a global threat to biodiversity and is increasing at a rate greater than any other pollutant. We conducted a field experiment to investigate the effects of short-term nighttime illumination on nocturnal flying insects and insectivorous bats in previously unlit remnant bushland. We compared these organisms' responses to three types of light-emitting diode (LED) lights, each with a unique spectral composition (cool white [CW], λ<i>P</i> 457 nm; filtered white [FW], λ<i>P</i> 586 nm; and amber [A], λ<i>P</i> 601 nm), as well as a control (C) group without illumination. Our findings revealed that both CW and FW LEDs significantly increased the total activity of flying insects, particularly the orders Diptera, Coleoptera, and Hymenoptera. By contrast, total bat activity was independent of light treatment, but there was a marginally non-significant effect on bats presumed to be light sensitive. Amber lights appear to mitigate the disruptive effects of light on at least one light sensitive bat species. Intriguingly, despite a positive association in one bat species with insect abundance, there was no corresponding increase in feeding activity around illuminated sites in this or any other species. These observations suggest that bats may not solely exploit the attraction of insects to LED lights as a feeding resource and that those species that persist in these environments are perhaps more light tolerant than light exploitive. Overall, our study highlights potentially complex responses of Australian insectivorous bats and flying insects to short-term LED lighting and contributes further insights into the ecological consequences of nighttime lighting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecosphere\",\"volume\":\"16 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70291\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecosphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70291\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70291","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

夜间人造光对全球生物多样性构成威胁,而且其增长速度比任何其他污染物都要快。通过野外试验,研究了夜间短时间光照对夜间活动的飞虫和食虫蝙蝠的影响。我们比较了这些生物对三种发光二极管(LED)灯的反应,每种灯都有独特的光谱组成(冷白色[CW], λP 457 nm;滤白[FW], λP 586 nm;琥珀色[A], λP 601 nm),以及不光照的对照组(C)。结果表明,连续发光二极管和连续发光二极管均能显著提高昆虫的总活性,尤其是双翅目、鞘翅目和膜翅目昆虫。相比之下,蝙蝠的总活动与光处理无关,但对被认为对光敏感的蝙蝠有轻微的不显著影响。琥珀色的灯似乎减轻了光对至少一种光敏感的蝙蝠物种的破坏性影响。有趣的是,尽管一种蝙蝠与昆虫丰度呈正相关,但在这种或任何其他物种的照明地点周围,摄食活动没有相应的增加。这些观察结果表明,蝙蝠可能不仅仅利用昆虫对LED灯的吸引力作为一种食物资源,而且那些在这些环境中持续存在的物种可能比光利用更耐光。总的来说,我们的研究强调了澳大利亚食虫蝙蝠和飞虫对短期LED照明的潜在复杂反应,并有助于进一步了解夜间照明的生态后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Divergent responses of insectivorous bats and flying insects to experimental LED illumination of different spectra

Divergent responses of insectivorous bats and flying insects to experimental LED illumination of different spectra

Artificial light at night poses a global threat to biodiversity and is increasing at a rate greater than any other pollutant. We conducted a field experiment to investigate the effects of short-term nighttime illumination on nocturnal flying insects and insectivorous bats in previously unlit remnant bushland. We compared these organisms' responses to three types of light-emitting diode (LED) lights, each with a unique spectral composition (cool white [CW], λP 457 nm; filtered white [FW], λP 586 nm; and amber [A], λP 601 nm), as well as a control (C) group without illumination. Our findings revealed that both CW and FW LEDs significantly increased the total activity of flying insects, particularly the orders Diptera, Coleoptera, and Hymenoptera. By contrast, total bat activity was independent of light treatment, but there was a marginally non-significant effect on bats presumed to be light sensitive. Amber lights appear to mitigate the disruptive effects of light on at least one light sensitive bat species. Intriguingly, despite a positive association in one bat species with insect abundance, there was no corresponding increase in feeding activity around illuminated sites in this or any other species. These observations suggest that bats may not solely exploit the attraction of insects to LED lights as a feeding resource and that those species that persist in these environments are perhaps more light tolerant than light exploitive. Overall, our study highlights potentially complex responses of Australian insectivorous bats and flying insects to short-term LED lighting and contributes further insights into the ecological consequences of nighttime lighting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信