接受过NIPT的妇女对产前检查态度的变化:日本引入产前检查认证制度的影响

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Takeshi Nakamura, Nahoko Shirato, Tatsuko Ishii, Keiko Koide, Keiko Miyagami, Takahiro Yamada, Akihiko Sekizawa
{"title":"接受过NIPT的妇女对产前检查态度的变化:日本引入产前检查认证制度的影响","authors":"Takeshi Nakamura,&nbsp;Nahoko Shirato,&nbsp;Tatsuko Ishii,&nbsp;Keiko Koide,&nbsp;Keiko Miyagami,&nbsp;Takahiro Yamada,&nbsp;Akihiko Sekizawa","doi":"10.1111/jog.16324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>We compared changes in the perceptions of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) before and after the introduction of a government-involved NIPT certification system in July 2022.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Web-based surveys of pregnant women who underwent NIPT were conducted in 2020 (pre-certification) and 2023 (post-certification) using a pregnancy-related mobile application.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We obtained 1198 and 1227 responses from the 2020 and 2023 surveys, respectively. Compared with 2020 respondents, 2023 respondents who chose non-certified facilities emphasized word-of-mouth reputation, online appointment availability, expanded testing beyond the three major trisomies, low cost, and improved accessibility. The two survey years showed no significant differences in overall trends in facility selection and the tendency to choose certified facilities to prioritize recommendations from their primary care physicians and the availability of pre-test genetic counseling. Additionally, when NIPT results were non-negative, respondents tested at non-certified facilities in 2023 were more likely to report concerns such as “insufficient explanation increased my anxiety” and “I regretted my choice of testing facility.” More respondents in 2023 preferred to undergo NIPT at facilities that provide routine prenatal checkups and believed each pregnant woman should make testing decisions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>After introducing the NIPT certification system, those choosing to undergo testing at certified facilities emphasized the importance of comprehensive support, whereas those opting for non-certified facilities prioritized convenience. However, the latter group became increasingly aware of the lack of post-test support when faced with non-negative results.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","volume":"51 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in the attitudes of women who have undergone NIPT toward prenatal testing: The impact of the introduction of the prenatal testing certification system in Japan\",\"authors\":\"Takeshi Nakamura,&nbsp;Nahoko Shirato,&nbsp;Tatsuko Ishii,&nbsp;Keiko Koide,&nbsp;Keiko Miyagami,&nbsp;Takahiro Yamada,&nbsp;Akihiko Sekizawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jog.16324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>We compared changes in the perceptions of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) before and after the introduction of a government-involved NIPT certification system in July 2022.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Web-based surveys of pregnant women who underwent NIPT were conducted in 2020 (pre-certification) and 2023 (post-certification) using a pregnancy-related mobile application.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We obtained 1198 and 1227 responses from the 2020 and 2023 surveys, respectively. Compared with 2020 respondents, 2023 respondents who chose non-certified facilities emphasized word-of-mouth reputation, online appointment availability, expanded testing beyond the three major trisomies, low cost, and improved accessibility. The two survey years showed no significant differences in overall trends in facility selection and the tendency to choose certified facilities to prioritize recommendations from their primary care physicians and the availability of pre-test genetic counseling. Additionally, when NIPT results were non-negative, respondents tested at non-certified facilities in 2023 were more likely to report concerns such as “insufficient explanation increased my anxiety” and “I regretted my choice of testing facility.” More respondents in 2023 preferred to undergo NIPT at facilities that provide routine prenatal checkups and believed each pregnant woman should make testing decisions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>After introducing the NIPT certification system, those choosing to undergo testing at certified facilities emphasized the importance of comprehensive support, whereas those opting for non-certified facilities prioritized convenience. However, the latter group became increasingly aware of the lack of post-test support when faced with non-negative results.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research\",\"volume\":\"51 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.16324\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.16324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们比较了在2022年7月引入政府参与的NIPT认证系统之前和之后对无创产前检测(NIPT)的认知变化。方法在2020年(认证前)和2023年(认证后)使用与妊娠相关的移动应用程序对接受NIPT的孕妇进行网络调查。结果我们分别从2020年和2023年的调查中获得了1198和1227份回复。与2020年的受访者相比,2023年选择非认证机构的受访者强调口碑声誉、在线预约可用性、在三大三要素之外扩展测试、低成本和可及性。这两年的调查显示,在设施选择的总体趋势和选择认证设施的倾向上没有显著差异,优先考虑他们的初级保健医生的建议和检测前遗传咨询的可用性。此外,当NIPT结果为非阴性时,2023年在非认证设施进行测试的受访者更有可能报告诸如“解释不充分增加了我的焦虑”和“我后悔选择了测试设施”之类的担忧。2023年,更多的受访者更愿意在提供常规产前检查的机构接受NIPT,并认为每个孕妇都应该做出检测决定。引入NIPT认证体系后,选择在认证机构进行检测的人强调全面支持的重要性,而选择在非认证机构进行检测的人则优先考虑便利性。然而,当面对非阴性结果时,后者越来越意识到缺乏测试后支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in the attitudes of women who have undergone NIPT toward prenatal testing: The impact of the introduction of the prenatal testing certification system in Japan

Aims

We compared changes in the perceptions of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) before and after the introduction of a government-involved NIPT certification system in July 2022.

Methods

Web-based surveys of pregnant women who underwent NIPT were conducted in 2020 (pre-certification) and 2023 (post-certification) using a pregnancy-related mobile application.

Results

We obtained 1198 and 1227 responses from the 2020 and 2023 surveys, respectively. Compared with 2020 respondents, 2023 respondents who chose non-certified facilities emphasized word-of-mouth reputation, online appointment availability, expanded testing beyond the three major trisomies, low cost, and improved accessibility. The two survey years showed no significant differences in overall trends in facility selection and the tendency to choose certified facilities to prioritize recommendations from their primary care physicians and the availability of pre-test genetic counseling. Additionally, when NIPT results were non-negative, respondents tested at non-certified facilities in 2023 were more likely to report concerns such as “insufficient explanation increased my anxiety” and “I regretted my choice of testing facility.” More respondents in 2023 preferred to undergo NIPT at facilities that provide routine prenatal checkups and believed each pregnant woman should make testing decisions.

Conclusions

After introducing the NIPT certification system, those choosing to undergo testing at certified facilities emphasized the importance of comprehensive support, whereas those opting for non-certified facilities prioritized convenience. However, the latter group became increasingly aware of the lack of post-test support when faced with non-negative results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
376
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research is the official Journal of the Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology and of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and aims to provide a medium for the publication of articles in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal publishes original research articles, case reports, review articles and letters to the editor. The Journal will give publication priority to original research articles over case reports. Accepted papers become the exclusive licence of the Journal. Manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two referees and/or Associate Editors expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信