慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入皮质类固醇剂量与骨质疏松或骨折风险:系统评价和荟萃分析

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Wang Chun Kwok, Chung Ki Tsui, Sze Him Isaac Leung, Shuk Man Ngai, David Chi Leung Lam, Mary Sau Man Ip, James Chung Man Ho
{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入皮质类固醇剂量与骨质疏松或骨折风险:系统评价和荟萃分析","authors":"Wang Chun Kwok,&nbsp;Chung Ki Tsui,&nbsp;Sze Him Isaac Leung,&nbsp;Shuk Man Ngai,&nbsp;David Chi Leung Lam,&nbsp;Mary Sau Man Ip,&nbsp;James Chung Man Ho","doi":"10.1111/crj.70086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) is a major pharmacotherapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which is associated with various adverse effects. Controversies exist in whether ICS use in COPD is associated with osteoporosis or fracture.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the risks of osteoporosis or fracture at different dosing levels of ICS. High-, medium- and low-dose ICS were defined according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) step definition.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data sources</h3>\n \n <p>Cochrane, EMBASE, Ovid, PubMed and Web of Science were systematically searched until 8 December 2023.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data extraction</h3>\n \n <p>Osteoporosis or fracture under ICS therapy was chosen as the primary efficacy outcome. Three reviewers were involved independently in the extraction process. The risk of bias of the included studies was evaluated by using different assessment tools.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-one RCTs and eight observational studies were included. High-dose ICS was associated with increased risks of osteoporosis or fracture in RCTs with RR of 1.14 (95% CI = 1.03–1.28), observational studies with healthy controls 1.14 (95% CI = 1.05–1.24) and observational studies without healthy controls 1.10 (95% CI = 1.01–1.21). High-dose ICS was associated with increased risks in fracture in RCTs with RR of 1.12 (95% CI = 1.03–1.23), observational studies with health controls 1.15 (95% CI = 1.05–1.25) and observational studies without healthy controls 1.13 (95% CI = 1.03–1.24). Medium- and low-dose ICS were not associated with osteoporosis or fracture.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>High-dose, but not medium- and low-dose, ICS use in COPD is associated with risks of osteoporosis or fractures.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55247,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":"19 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/crj.70086","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dose of Inhaled Corticosteroid in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Risks of Osteoporosis or Fracture—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Wang Chun Kwok,&nbsp;Chung Ki Tsui,&nbsp;Sze Him Isaac Leung,&nbsp;Shuk Man Ngai,&nbsp;David Chi Leung Lam,&nbsp;Mary Sau Man Ip,&nbsp;James Chung Man Ho\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/crj.70086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) is a major pharmacotherapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which is associated with various adverse effects. Controversies exist in whether ICS use in COPD is associated with osteoporosis or fracture.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the risks of osteoporosis or fracture at different dosing levels of ICS. High-, medium- and low-dose ICS were defined according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) step definition.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Data sources</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cochrane, EMBASE, Ovid, PubMed and Web of Science were systematically searched until 8 December 2023.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Data extraction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Osteoporosis or fracture under ICS therapy was chosen as the primary efficacy outcome. Three reviewers were involved independently in the extraction process. The risk of bias of the included studies was evaluated by using different assessment tools.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twenty-one RCTs and eight observational studies were included. High-dose ICS was associated with increased risks of osteoporosis or fracture in RCTs with RR of 1.14 (95% CI = 1.03–1.28), observational studies with healthy controls 1.14 (95% CI = 1.05–1.24) and observational studies without healthy controls 1.10 (95% CI = 1.01–1.21). High-dose ICS was associated with increased risks in fracture in RCTs with RR of 1.12 (95% CI = 1.03–1.23), observational studies with health controls 1.15 (95% CI = 1.05–1.25) and observational studies without healthy controls 1.13 (95% CI = 1.03–1.24). Medium- and low-dose ICS were not associated with osteoporosis or fracture.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>High-dose, but not medium- and low-dose, ICS use in COPD is associated with risks of osteoporosis or fractures.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Respiratory Journal\",\"volume\":\"19 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/crj.70086\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Respiratory Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/crj.70086\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/crj.70086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)是慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的主要药物治疗方法,但存在多种不良反应。对于慢性阻塞性肺病患者使用ICS是否与骨质疏松或骨折有关存在争议。目的:我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估不同剂量的ICS对骨质疏松或骨折的风险。根据全球哮喘倡议(GINA)分级定义高、中、低剂量ICS。系统检索数据来源为Cochrane、EMBASE、Ovid、PubMed和Web of Science,检索截止日期为2023年12月8日。选择ICS治疗下的骨质疏松或骨折作为主要疗效终点。三名审稿人独立参与了提取过程。采用不同的评估工具对纳入研究的偏倚风险进行评估。结果纳入21项随机对照试验和8项观察性研究。在随机对照试验中,高剂量ICS与骨质疏松或骨折风险增加相关,RR为1.14 (95% CI = 1.03-1.28),健康对照观察性研究为1.14 (95% CI = 1.05-1.24),无健康对照观察性研究为1.10 (95% CI = 1.01-1.21)。在随机对照试验中,高剂量ICS与骨折风险增加相关,RR为1.12 (95% CI = 1.03-1.23),健康对照观察性研究为1.15 (95% CI = 1.05-1.25),无健康对照观察性研究为1.13 (95% CI = 1.03-1.24)。中、低剂量ICS与骨质疏松或骨折无关。结论慢性阻塞性肺病患者使用高剂量而非中、低剂量ICS与骨质疏松或骨折风险相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dose of Inhaled Corticosteroid in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Risks of Osteoporosis or Fracture—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Dose of Inhaled Corticosteroid in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Risks of Osteoporosis or Fracture—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) is a major pharmacotherapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which is associated with various adverse effects. Controversies exist in whether ICS use in COPD is associated with osteoporosis or fracture.

Objective

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the risks of osteoporosis or fracture at different dosing levels of ICS. High-, medium- and low-dose ICS were defined according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) step definition.

Data sources

Cochrane, EMBASE, Ovid, PubMed and Web of Science were systematically searched until 8 December 2023.

Data extraction

Osteoporosis or fracture under ICS therapy was chosen as the primary efficacy outcome. Three reviewers were involved independently in the extraction process. The risk of bias of the included studies was evaluated by using different assessment tools.

Results

Twenty-one RCTs and eight observational studies were included. High-dose ICS was associated with increased risks of osteoporosis or fracture in RCTs with RR of 1.14 (95% CI = 1.03–1.28), observational studies with healthy controls 1.14 (95% CI = 1.05–1.24) and observational studies without healthy controls 1.10 (95% CI = 1.01–1.21). High-dose ICS was associated with increased risks in fracture in RCTs with RR of 1.12 (95% CI = 1.03–1.23), observational studies with health controls 1.15 (95% CI = 1.05–1.25) and observational studies without healthy controls 1.13 (95% CI = 1.03–1.24). Medium- and low-dose ICS were not associated with osteoporosis or fracture.

Conclusion

High-dose, but not medium- and low-dose, ICS use in COPD is associated with risks of osteoporosis or fractures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Respiratory Journal
Clinical Respiratory Journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Overview Effective with the 2016 volume, this journal will be published in an online-only format. Aims and Scope The Clinical Respiratory Journal (CRJ) provides a forum for clinical research in all areas of respiratory medicine from clinical lung disease to basic research relevant to the clinic. We publish original research, review articles, case studies, editorials and book reviews in all areas of clinical lung disease including: Asthma Allergy COPD Non-invasive ventilation Sleep related breathing disorders Interstitial lung diseases Lung cancer Clinical genetics Rhinitis Airway and lung infection Epidemiology Pediatrics CRJ provides a fast-track service for selected Phase II and Phase III trial studies. Keywords Clinical Respiratory Journal, respiratory, pulmonary, medicine, clinical, lung disease, Abstracting and Indexing Information Academic Search (EBSCO Publishing) Academic Search Alumni Edition (EBSCO Publishing) Embase (Elsevier) Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest) Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest) HEED: Health Economic Evaluations Database (Wiley-Blackwell) Hospital Premium Collection (ProQuest) Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics) MEDLINE/PubMed (NLM) ProQuest Central (ProQuest) Science Citation Index Expanded (Clarivate Analytics) SCOPUS (Elsevier)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信