{"title":"印度泰米尔纳德邦Kallakurichi和Villupuram地区不同土地利用系统的生物量和碳储量空间量化","authors":"Kumaraperumal Ramalingam, Preethi Sekar, Nivas Raj Moorthi","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12302-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The transformations and sudden shift in the land use and land cover systems (LULC) greatly contributes to the human induced greenhouse gas emissions. With the carbon stock and biomass being quantified for each LULC systems, the sequestration potential and its associated parameters can be assessed aiding in the formulation of carbon related policy decisions. Fifteen different LULC classes including the crops cultivated in the study area were delineated by integrating optical (Sentinel 2A), microwave (Sentinel 1A), and its associated vegetation indices (26 Nos.) using several machine learning algorithms (i.e.) Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multinomial Logistic Regression (MLR), Decision Tree (C5.0) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB). The classification resulted with the random forest having the highest overall accuracy of 71.1% and a kappa coefficient of 0.69, which were enhanced through mask-based delineations. For biomass and stock quantification, a total of 105 observation samples have been collected from the agriculture and forest LULC systems randomly for analysing biomass, bulk density and soil organic carbon using standardized laboratory procedure. The vegetation indices (VI) from both the optical and SAR datasets were then used for the biomass modelling using Multiple Linear Regression (MLR). The regression was then performed with different combinations of the vegetation indices framed and their performance being validated using the test datasets partitioned. Though optical datasets had the evident highest correlation with the biomass values, when compared to the SAR datasets, the synergistic combination of both datasets (optical and SAR) increased the overall performance of the model for above ground biomass estimation. The efficiency of the quantifications was assessed based on the R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE to indicate the explained variance and the nature of the residuals in the derived model combinations. The integrated optical and the SAR dataset combinations resulted with the R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE highest for the training (0.84; 3.78 t/ha) and test (0.96; 2.38 t/ha) datasets for agricultural ecosystem. Similarly, for the forest ecosystem, the R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE metrics derived for the training (0.92; 11.25 t/ha) and the test datasets (0.73; 31.01 t/ha) had the highest measure among the combinations derived. The comprehensive results of the study reported that the random forest and MLR algorithm aided through optical and SAR datasets provided optimal classification and regression results, respectively. Further, the modeling framework resulted with sugarcane crop class having the highest total carbon stock values besides the evergreen forest sequestrating the maximum biomass and carbon stock. Thus, each of the agricultural and forest classes indicated their efficiency in accounting the carbon credit, which can be utilized by the policy makers in strategizing the regulations for carbon sequestration, sustainable land management, and climate change mitigation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatial quantification of biomass and carbon stock for different land use systems of Kallakurichi and Villupuram districts of Tamil Nadu, India\",\"authors\":\"Kumaraperumal Ramalingam, Preethi Sekar, Nivas Raj Moorthi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12665-025-12302-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The transformations and sudden shift in the land use and land cover systems (LULC) greatly contributes to the human induced greenhouse gas emissions. With the carbon stock and biomass being quantified for each LULC systems, the sequestration potential and its associated parameters can be assessed aiding in the formulation of carbon related policy decisions. Fifteen different LULC classes including the crops cultivated in the study area were delineated by integrating optical (Sentinel 2A), microwave (Sentinel 1A), and its associated vegetation indices (26 Nos.) using several machine learning algorithms (i.e.) Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multinomial Logistic Regression (MLR), Decision Tree (C5.0) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB). The classification resulted with the random forest having the highest overall accuracy of 71.1% and a kappa coefficient of 0.69, which were enhanced through mask-based delineations. For biomass and stock quantification, a total of 105 observation samples have been collected from the agriculture and forest LULC systems randomly for analysing biomass, bulk density and soil organic carbon using standardized laboratory procedure. The vegetation indices (VI) from both the optical and SAR datasets were then used for the biomass modelling using Multiple Linear Regression (MLR). The regression was then performed with different combinations of the vegetation indices framed and their performance being validated using the test datasets partitioned. Though optical datasets had the evident highest correlation with the biomass values, when compared to the SAR datasets, the synergistic combination of both datasets (optical and SAR) increased the overall performance of the model for above ground biomass estimation. The efficiency of the quantifications was assessed based on the R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE to indicate the explained variance and the nature of the residuals in the derived model combinations. The integrated optical and the SAR dataset combinations resulted with the R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE highest for the training (0.84; 3.78 t/ha) and test (0.96; 2.38 t/ha) datasets for agricultural ecosystem. Similarly, for the forest ecosystem, the R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE metrics derived for the training (0.92; 11.25 t/ha) and the test datasets (0.73; 31.01 t/ha) had the highest measure among the combinations derived. The comprehensive results of the study reported that the random forest and MLR algorithm aided through optical and SAR datasets provided optimal classification and regression results, respectively. Further, the modeling framework resulted with sugarcane crop class having the highest total carbon stock values besides the evergreen forest sequestrating the maximum biomass and carbon stock. Thus, each of the agricultural and forest classes indicated their efficiency in accounting the carbon credit, which can be utilized by the policy makers in strategizing the regulations for carbon sequestration, sustainable land management, and climate change mitigation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"84 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12302-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12302-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Spatial quantification of biomass and carbon stock for different land use systems of Kallakurichi and Villupuram districts of Tamil Nadu, India
The transformations and sudden shift in the land use and land cover systems (LULC) greatly contributes to the human induced greenhouse gas emissions. With the carbon stock and biomass being quantified for each LULC systems, the sequestration potential and its associated parameters can be assessed aiding in the formulation of carbon related policy decisions. Fifteen different LULC classes including the crops cultivated in the study area were delineated by integrating optical (Sentinel 2A), microwave (Sentinel 1A), and its associated vegetation indices (26 Nos.) using several machine learning algorithms (i.e.) Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multinomial Logistic Regression (MLR), Decision Tree (C5.0) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB). The classification resulted with the random forest having the highest overall accuracy of 71.1% and a kappa coefficient of 0.69, which were enhanced through mask-based delineations. For biomass and stock quantification, a total of 105 observation samples have been collected from the agriculture and forest LULC systems randomly for analysing biomass, bulk density and soil organic carbon using standardized laboratory procedure. The vegetation indices (VI) from both the optical and SAR datasets were then used for the biomass modelling using Multiple Linear Regression (MLR). The regression was then performed with different combinations of the vegetation indices framed and their performance being validated using the test datasets partitioned. Though optical datasets had the evident highest correlation with the biomass values, when compared to the SAR datasets, the synergistic combination of both datasets (optical and SAR) increased the overall performance of the model for above ground biomass estimation. The efficiency of the quantifications was assessed based on the R2 and RMSE to indicate the explained variance and the nature of the residuals in the derived model combinations. The integrated optical and the SAR dataset combinations resulted with the R2 and RMSE highest for the training (0.84; 3.78 t/ha) and test (0.96; 2.38 t/ha) datasets for agricultural ecosystem. Similarly, for the forest ecosystem, the R2 and RMSE metrics derived for the training (0.92; 11.25 t/ha) and the test datasets (0.73; 31.01 t/ha) had the highest measure among the combinations derived. The comprehensive results of the study reported that the random forest and MLR algorithm aided through optical and SAR datasets provided optimal classification and regression results, respectively. Further, the modeling framework resulted with sugarcane crop class having the highest total carbon stock values besides the evergreen forest sequestrating the maximum biomass and carbon stock. Thus, each of the agricultural and forest classes indicated their efficiency in accounting the carbon credit, which can be utilized by the policy makers in strategizing the regulations for carbon sequestration, sustainable land management, and climate change mitigation.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth:
Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices
Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water
Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans
Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards
Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth
Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources
Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials
Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems
Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment
In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.