印度泰米尔纳德邦Kallakurichi和Villupuram地区不同土地利用系统的生物量和碳储量空间量化

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Kumaraperumal Ramalingam, Preethi Sekar, Nivas Raj Moorthi
{"title":"印度泰米尔纳德邦Kallakurichi和Villupuram地区不同土地利用系统的生物量和碳储量空间量化","authors":"Kumaraperumal Ramalingam,&nbsp;Preethi Sekar,&nbsp;Nivas Raj Moorthi","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12302-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The transformations and sudden shift in the land use and land cover systems (LULC) greatly contributes to the human induced greenhouse gas emissions. With the carbon stock and biomass being quantified for each LULC systems, the sequestration potential and its associated parameters can be assessed aiding in the formulation of carbon related policy decisions. Fifteen different LULC classes including the crops cultivated in the study area were delineated by integrating optical (Sentinel 2A), microwave (Sentinel 1A), and its associated vegetation indices (26 Nos.) using several machine learning algorithms (i.e.) Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multinomial Logistic Regression (MLR), Decision Tree (C5.0) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB). The classification resulted with the random forest having the highest overall accuracy of 71.1% and a kappa coefficient of 0.69, which were enhanced through mask-based delineations. For biomass and stock quantification, a total of 105 observation samples have been collected from the agriculture and forest LULC systems randomly for analysing biomass, bulk density and soil organic carbon using standardized laboratory procedure. The vegetation indices (VI) from both the optical and SAR datasets were then used for the biomass modelling using Multiple Linear Regression (MLR). The regression was then performed with different combinations of the vegetation indices framed and their performance being validated using the test datasets partitioned. Though optical datasets had the evident highest correlation with the biomass values, when compared to the SAR datasets, the synergistic combination of both datasets (optical and SAR) increased the overall performance of the model for above ground biomass estimation. The efficiency of the quantifications was assessed based on the R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE to indicate the explained variance and the nature of the residuals in the derived model combinations. The integrated optical and the SAR dataset combinations resulted with the R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE highest for the training (0.84; 3.78 t/ha) and test (0.96; 2.38 t/ha) datasets for agricultural ecosystem. Similarly, for the forest ecosystem, the R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE metrics derived for the training (0.92; 11.25 t/ha) and the test datasets (0.73; 31.01 t/ha) had the highest measure among the combinations derived. The comprehensive results of the study reported that the random forest and MLR algorithm aided through optical and SAR datasets provided optimal classification and regression results, respectively. Further, the modeling framework resulted with sugarcane crop class having the highest total carbon stock values besides the evergreen forest sequestrating the maximum biomass and carbon stock. Thus, each of the agricultural and forest classes indicated their efficiency in accounting the carbon credit, which can be utilized by the policy makers in strategizing the regulations for carbon sequestration, sustainable land management, and climate change mitigation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatial quantification of biomass and carbon stock for different land use systems of Kallakurichi and Villupuram districts of Tamil Nadu, India\",\"authors\":\"Kumaraperumal Ramalingam,&nbsp;Preethi Sekar,&nbsp;Nivas Raj Moorthi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12665-025-12302-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The transformations and sudden shift in the land use and land cover systems (LULC) greatly contributes to the human induced greenhouse gas emissions. With the carbon stock and biomass being quantified for each LULC systems, the sequestration potential and its associated parameters can be assessed aiding in the formulation of carbon related policy decisions. Fifteen different LULC classes including the crops cultivated in the study area were delineated by integrating optical (Sentinel 2A), microwave (Sentinel 1A), and its associated vegetation indices (26 Nos.) using several machine learning algorithms (i.e.) Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multinomial Logistic Regression (MLR), Decision Tree (C5.0) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB). The classification resulted with the random forest having the highest overall accuracy of 71.1% and a kappa coefficient of 0.69, which were enhanced through mask-based delineations. For biomass and stock quantification, a total of 105 observation samples have been collected from the agriculture and forest LULC systems randomly for analysing biomass, bulk density and soil organic carbon using standardized laboratory procedure. The vegetation indices (VI) from both the optical and SAR datasets were then used for the biomass modelling using Multiple Linear Regression (MLR). The regression was then performed with different combinations of the vegetation indices framed and their performance being validated using the test datasets partitioned. Though optical datasets had the evident highest correlation with the biomass values, when compared to the SAR datasets, the synergistic combination of both datasets (optical and SAR) increased the overall performance of the model for above ground biomass estimation. The efficiency of the quantifications was assessed based on the R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE to indicate the explained variance and the nature of the residuals in the derived model combinations. The integrated optical and the SAR dataset combinations resulted with the R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE highest for the training (0.84; 3.78 t/ha) and test (0.96; 2.38 t/ha) datasets for agricultural ecosystem. Similarly, for the forest ecosystem, the R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE metrics derived for the training (0.92; 11.25 t/ha) and the test datasets (0.73; 31.01 t/ha) had the highest measure among the combinations derived. The comprehensive results of the study reported that the random forest and MLR algorithm aided through optical and SAR datasets provided optimal classification and regression results, respectively. Further, the modeling framework resulted with sugarcane crop class having the highest total carbon stock values besides the evergreen forest sequestrating the maximum biomass and carbon stock. Thus, each of the agricultural and forest classes indicated their efficiency in accounting the carbon credit, which can be utilized by the policy makers in strategizing the regulations for carbon sequestration, sustainable land management, and climate change mitigation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"84 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12302-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12302-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土地利用和土地覆盖系统(LULC)的转变和突变是人为温室气体排放的重要因素。通过对每个生态系统的碳储量和生物量进行量化,可以评估固存潜力及其相关参数,从而有助于制定与碳有关的政策决定。利用随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)、多项逻辑回归(MLR)、决策树(C5.0)和极端梯度增强(XGB)等机器学习算法,综合光学(Sentinel 2A)、微波(Sentinel 1A)及其相关植被指数(26 no),划分了研究区15个不同的LULC类别。分类结果表明,随机森林的总体准确率最高,为71.1%,kappa系数为0.69,通过基于掩模的划分提高了分类精度。在生物量和储量量化方面,采用标准化实验室程序,随机收集了105个农业和森林LULC系统的观测样本,分析了生物量、容重和土壤有机碳。然后利用光学和SAR数据集的植被指数(VI)进行多元线性回归(MLR)生物量建模。然后使用不同组合的植被指数框架进行回归,并使用分割的测试数据集验证其性能。虽然光学数据集与生物量值的相关性最高,但与SAR数据集相比,两种数据集(光学和SAR)的协同组合提高了模型对地上生物量估算的整体性能。根据R2和RMSE来评估量化的效率,以表明衍生模型组合中可解释的方差和残差的性质。综合光学和SAR数据集组合的训练R2和RMSE最高(0.84;3.78 t/ha)和试验(0.96;2.38 t/ha)农业生态系统数据集。同样,对于森林生态系统,训练得到的R2和RMSE指标(0.92;11.25 t/ha)和测试数据集(0.73;31.01 t/ hm2)的测量值最高。综合研究结果,随机森林和MLR算法分别在光学和SAR数据集的辅助下提供了最优的分类和回归结果。此外,模型框架还表明,除常绿森林吸收生物量和碳储量最大外,甘蔗作物类别的总碳储量最高。因此,农业和森林的每一个类别都表明了它们在核算碳信用额方面的效率,决策者可以利用碳信用额制定碳封存、可持续土地管理和减缓气候变化的法规战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spatial quantification of biomass and carbon stock for different land use systems of Kallakurichi and Villupuram districts of Tamil Nadu, India

The transformations and sudden shift in the land use and land cover systems (LULC) greatly contributes to the human induced greenhouse gas emissions. With the carbon stock and biomass being quantified for each LULC systems, the sequestration potential and its associated parameters can be assessed aiding in the formulation of carbon related policy decisions. Fifteen different LULC classes including the crops cultivated in the study area were delineated by integrating optical (Sentinel 2A), microwave (Sentinel 1A), and its associated vegetation indices (26 Nos.) using several machine learning algorithms (i.e.) Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multinomial Logistic Regression (MLR), Decision Tree (C5.0) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB). The classification resulted with the random forest having the highest overall accuracy of 71.1% and a kappa coefficient of 0.69, which were enhanced through mask-based delineations. For biomass and stock quantification, a total of 105 observation samples have been collected from the agriculture and forest LULC systems randomly for analysing biomass, bulk density and soil organic carbon using standardized laboratory procedure. The vegetation indices (VI) from both the optical and SAR datasets were then used for the biomass modelling using Multiple Linear Regression (MLR). The regression was then performed with different combinations of the vegetation indices framed and their performance being validated using the test datasets partitioned. Though optical datasets had the evident highest correlation with the biomass values, when compared to the SAR datasets, the synergistic combination of both datasets (optical and SAR) increased the overall performance of the model for above ground biomass estimation. The efficiency of the quantifications was assessed based on the R2 and RMSE to indicate the explained variance and the nature of the residuals in the derived model combinations. The integrated optical and the SAR dataset combinations resulted with the R2 and RMSE highest for the training (0.84; 3.78 t/ha) and test (0.96; 2.38 t/ha) datasets for agricultural ecosystem. Similarly, for the forest ecosystem, the R2 and RMSE metrics derived for the training (0.92; 11.25 t/ha) and the test datasets (0.73; 31.01 t/ha) had the highest measure among the combinations derived. The comprehensive results of the study reported that the random forest and MLR algorithm aided through optical and SAR datasets provided optimal classification and regression results, respectively. Further, the modeling framework resulted with sugarcane crop class having the highest total carbon stock values besides the evergreen forest sequestrating the maximum biomass and carbon stock. Thus, each of the agricultural and forest classes indicated their efficiency in accounting the carbon credit, which can be utilized by the policy makers in strategizing the regulations for carbon sequestration, sustainable land management, and climate change mitigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信