结合暗发酵和微生物电解利用生物基废液制氢的技术经济和生命周期分析

IF 9.3 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Green Chemistry Pub Date : 2025-05-13 DOI:10.1039/D4GC05020G
Arna Ganguly, Pingping Sun, Xinyu Liu, Hernan E. Delgado, Lili Sun and Amgad Elgowainy
{"title":"结合暗发酵和微生物电解利用生物基废液制氢的技术经济和生命周期分析","authors":"Arna Ganguly, Pingping Sun, Xinyu Liu, Hernan E. Delgado, Lili Sun and Amgad Elgowainy","doi":"10.1039/D4GC05020G","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Hydrogen derived from bio-based sources, or biohydrogen (bioH<small><sub>2</sub></small>), has the potential to reduce GHG emissions from industrial and transportation sectors, owing to the low carbon footprint and myriad applications like refinery operation, ammonia production, steel production, fuel cell, <em>etc.</em> To evaluate the commercialization potential of bioH<small><sub>2</sub></small> production, we modeled bioH<small><sub>2</sub></small> production and conducted techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle analysis (LCA) of two facilities producing 50 metric tonnes of bioH<small><sub>2</sub></small> per day from cheese whey (CW) and solid food waste (SFW) through the integration of dark fermentation (DF) and microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) technologies. LCA results showed that CW and SFW can produce carbon-negative bioH<small><sub>2</sub></small>, with emissions of −8.6 and −8.0 kg GHG kg<small><sup>−1</sup></small> bioH<small><sub>2</sub></small> with carbon sequestration and renewable electricity resources, respectively, making bioH<small><sub>2</sub></small> potentially eligible for a tax credit of $3 kg<small><sup>−1</sup></small> H<small><sub>2</sub></small> based on provision 45 V of the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). In this study, bioH<small><sub>2</sub></small> production treats waste streams to generate fresh water, thus, potentially can receive waste water treatment fee that varies with regions. The MEC capital cost dominates the bioH<small><sub>2</sub></small> cost, which is mainly determined by current density. With a current density of 20 A m<small><sup>−2</sup></small>, the production cost for CW input varied between $17 and $24 kg<small><sup>−1</sup></small> bioH<small><sub>2</sub></small>, while that for SFW input ranged from $29 to $30 kg<small><sup>−1</sup></small> bioH<small><sub>2</sub></small> under different operating conditions, considering the 45 V tax credit, waste water treatment fee and production revenue. If the current density increases to 100 A m<small><sup>−2</sup></small>, the bioH<small><sub>2</sub></small> cost decreases to a range of $4.0–$6.9 for CW and $5–$6 for SFW scenarios. This study also shows that low-cost bioH<small><sub>2</sub></small> can be produced using CW waste stream as feedstock.</p>","PeriodicalId":78,"journal":{"name":"Green Chemistry","volume":" 21","pages":" 6213-6231"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/gc/d4gc05020g?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techno-economic and life cycle analysis of bio-hydrogen production using bio-based waste streams through the integration of dark fermentation and microbial electrolysis†\",\"authors\":\"Arna Ganguly, Pingping Sun, Xinyu Liu, Hernan E. Delgado, Lili Sun and Amgad Elgowainy\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D4GC05020G\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Hydrogen derived from bio-based sources, or biohydrogen (bioH<small><sub>2</sub></small>), has the potential to reduce GHG emissions from industrial and transportation sectors, owing to the low carbon footprint and myriad applications like refinery operation, ammonia production, steel production, fuel cell, <em>etc.</em> To evaluate the commercialization potential of bioH<small><sub>2</sub></small> production, we modeled bioH<small><sub>2</sub></small> production and conducted techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle analysis (LCA) of two facilities producing 50 metric tonnes of bioH<small><sub>2</sub></small> per day from cheese whey (CW) and solid food waste (SFW) through the integration of dark fermentation (DF) and microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) technologies. LCA results showed that CW and SFW can produce carbon-negative bioH<small><sub>2</sub></small>, with emissions of −8.6 and −8.0 kg GHG kg<small><sup>−1</sup></small> bioH<small><sub>2</sub></small> with carbon sequestration and renewable electricity resources, respectively, making bioH<small><sub>2</sub></small> potentially eligible for a tax credit of $3 kg<small><sup>−1</sup></small> H<small><sub>2</sub></small> based on provision 45 V of the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). In this study, bioH<small><sub>2</sub></small> production treats waste streams to generate fresh water, thus, potentially can receive waste water treatment fee that varies with regions. The MEC capital cost dominates the bioH<small><sub>2</sub></small> cost, which is mainly determined by current density. With a current density of 20 A m<small><sup>−2</sup></small>, the production cost for CW input varied between $17 and $24 kg<small><sup>−1</sup></small> bioH<small><sub>2</sub></small>, while that for SFW input ranged from $29 to $30 kg<small><sup>−1</sup></small> bioH<small><sub>2</sub></small> under different operating conditions, considering the 45 V tax credit, waste water treatment fee and production revenue. If the current density increases to 100 A m<small><sup>−2</sup></small>, the bioH<small><sub>2</sub></small> cost decreases to a range of $4.0–$6.9 for CW and $5–$6 for SFW scenarios. This study also shows that low-cost bioH<small><sub>2</sub></small> can be produced using CW waste stream as feedstock.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":78,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Green Chemistry\",\"volume\":\" 21\",\"pages\":\" 6213-6231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/gc/d4gc05020g?page=search\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Green Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/gc/d4gc05020g\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/gc/d4gc05020g","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于低碳足迹和炼油厂运营、氨生产、钢铁生产、燃料电池等众多应用,生物基氢或生物氢(bioH2)衍生的氢具有减少工业和运输部门温室气体排放的潜力。为了评估生物h2生产的商业化潜力,我们建立了生物h2生产模型,并通过整合暗发酵(DF)和微生物电解电池(MEC)技术,对两个每天从奶酪乳清(CW)和固体食物垃圾(SFW)中生产50公吨生物h2的设施进行了技术经济分析(TEA)和生命周期分析(LCA)。LCA结果表明,CW和SFW可以产生负碳的生物H2,碳固存和可再生电力资源的生物H2排放量分别为- 8.6和- 8.0 kg GHG kg - 1,根据美国通货膨胀减少法案(IRA)的45 V条款,生物H2可能有资格获得3 kg - 1 H2的税收抵免。在本研究中,生物制氢处理废水流产生淡水,因此可能会获得不同地区的废水处理费。MEC资本成本主导生物h2成本,主要由电流密度决定。在电流密度为20 a m−2的条件下,考虑到45 V的税收抵免、废水处理费和生产收入,不同工况下CW输入的bioH2生产成本在17 ~ 24美元之间,SFW输入的bioH2生产成本在29 ~ 30美元之间。如果电流密度增加到100 A m−2,生物h2的成本在CW情景下将降至4.0 - 6.9美元,在SFW情景下将降至5 - 6美元。该研究还表明,利用连续废水作为原料可以生产低成本的生物h2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Techno-economic and life cycle analysis of bio-hydrogen production using bio-based waste streams through the integration of dark fermentation and microbial electrolysis†

Hydrogen derived from bio-based sources, or biohydrogen (bioH2), has the potential to reduce GHG emissions from industrial and transportation sectors, owing to the low carbon footprint and myriad applications like refinery operation, ammonia production, steel production, fuel cell, etc. To evaluate the commercialization potential of bioH2 production, we modeled bioH2 production and conducted techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle analysis (LCA) of two facilities producing 50 metric tonnes of bioH2 per day from cheese whey (CW) and solid food waste (SFW) through the integration of dark fermentation (DF) and microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) technologies. LCA results showed that CW and SFW can produce carbon-negative bioH2, with emissions of −8.6 and −8.0 kg GHG kg−1 bioH2 with carbon sequestration and renewable electricity resources, respectively, making bioH2 potentially eligible for a tax credit of $3 kg−1 H2 based on provision 45 V of the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). In this study, bioH2 production treats waste streams to generate fresh water, thus, potentially can receive waste water treatment fee that varies with regions. The MEC capital cost dominates the bioH2 cost, which is mainly determined by current density. With a current density of 20 A m−2, the production cost for CW input varied between $17 and $24 kg−1 bioH2, while that for SFW input ranged from $29 to $30 kg−1 bioH2 under different operating conditions, considering the 45 V tax credit, waste water treatment fee and production revenue. If the current density increases to 100 A m−2, the bioH2 cost decreases to a range of $4.0–$6.9 for CW and $5–$6 for SFW scenarios. This study also shows that low-cost bioH2 can be produced using CW waste stream as feedstock.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Green Chemistry
Green Chemistry 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
677
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Green Chemistry is a journal that provides a unique forum for the publication of innovative research on the development of alternative green and sustainable technologies. The scope of Green Chemistry is based on the definition proposed by Anastas and Warner (Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice, P T Anastas and J C Warner, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998), which defines green chemistry as the utilisation of a set of principles that reduces or eliminates the use or generation of hazardous substances in the design, manufacture and application of chemical products. Green Chemistry aims to reduce the environmental impact of the chemical enterprise by developing a technology base that is inherently non-toxic to living things and the environment. The journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of research relating to this endeavor and publishes original and significant cutting-edge research that is likely to be of wide general appeal. For a work to be published, it must present a significant advance in green chemistry, including a comparison with existing methods and a demonstration of advantages over those methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信