用SonReb法无损评价实心烧制粘土砖强度

IF 7.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Albert Cabané , Tanguy Seneschal , Pere Roca , Luca Pelà
{"title":"用SonReb法无损评价实心烧制粘土砖强度","authors":"Albert Cabané ,&nbsp;Tanguy Seneschal ,&nbsp;Pere Roca ,&nbsp;Luca Pelà","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research explores potential non-destructive testing (NDT) methods for assessing the properties of solid fired clay (SFC) bricks in situ. Empirical correlations were established between the results from NDT and the compressive strength determined through traditional destructive testing (DT) techniques performed in a controlled laboratory setting. The research focuses on two specific NDT methods: the Rebound Hammer Test (RHT) and Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Test (UPV), alongside their integration into a combined approach referred to as the SonReb method. The RH method utilises the Q-value, a dimensionless parameter derived from the ratio between the kinetic energy measured of the reflected and forward hammer mass. The UPV test involves measuring the speed of ultrasonic waves travelling through the solid brick material. A total of 234 DT and 476 NDT were conducted on both modern and historical SFC bricks. The research accurately validates the application of the RHT on SFC bricks for determining compressive strength from the Q-value. Additionally, the study validates the SonReb method by testing SFC bricks and comparing the experimental compressive strength NDT value with obtained through DT. A novel empirical equation is proposed to estimate the compressive strength of the SFC bricks based on the SonReb method. Findings demonstrate an accurate relationship between NDT readings and the compressive strength determined by destructive methods on SFC bricks. Moreover, the results emphasise the reliability of the SonReb method in estimating compressive strength, providing a useful tool for in situ structural assessment of SFC bricks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"485 ","pages":"Article 141919"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-destructive evaluation of solid fired clay brick strength using the SonReb method\",\"authors\":\"Albert Cabané ,&nbsp;Tanguy Seneschal ,&nbsp;Pere Roca ,&nbsp;Luca Pelà\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This research explores potential non-destructive testing (NDT) methods for assessing the properties of solid fired clay (SFC) bricks in situ. Empirical correlations were established between the results from NDT and the compressive strength determined through traditional destructive testing (DT) techniques performed in a controlled laboratory setting. The research focuses on two specific NDT methods: the Rebound Hammer Test (RHT) and Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Test (UPV), alongside their integration into a combined approach referred to as the SonReb method. The RH method utilises the Q-value, a dimensionless parameter derived from the ratio between the kinetic energy measured of the reflected and forward hammer mass. The UPV test involves measuring the speed of ultrasonic waves travelling through the solid brick material. A total of 234 DT and 476 NDT were conducted on both modern and historical SFC bricks. The research accurately validates the application of the RHT on SFC bricks for determining compressive strength from the Q-value. Additionally, the study validates the SonReb method by testing SFC bricks and comparing the experimental compressive strength NDT value with obtained through DT. A novel empirical equation is proposed to estimate the compressive strength of the SFC bricks based on the SonReb method. Findings demonstrate an accurate relationship between NDT readings and the compressive strength determined by destructive methods on SFC bricks. Moreover, the results emphasise the reliability of the SonReb method in estimating compressive strength, providing a useful tool for in situ structural assessment of SFC bricks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Construction and Building Materials\",\"volume\":\"485 \",\"pages\":\"Article 141919\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Construction and Building Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825020707\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825020707","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探索了潜在的无损检测(NDT)方法来评估原位固体烧制粘土(SFC)砖的性能。NDT结果与传统破坏性测试(DT)技术在受控实验室环境中确定的抗压强度之间建立了经验相关性。研究重点是两种具体的无损检测方法:反弹锤测试(RHT)和超声波脉冲速度测试(UPV),并将它们整合到称为SonReb方法的组合方法中。RH方法利用了q值,这是一个无量纲参数,由反射锤质量和前向锤质量的动能之间的比值得出。UPV测试包括测量超声波穿过实心砖材料的速度。在现代和历史SFC砖上共进行了234次DT和476次无损检测。该研究准确地验证了RHT在SFC砖上的应用,通过q值来确定抗压强度。此外,通过对SFC砖进行测试,并将试验抗压强度NDT值与通过DT得到的值进行对比,验证了SonReb方法的有效性。基于SonReb方法,提出了一种估算SFC砖抗压强度的经验方程。研究结果表明,无损检测读数与SFC砖的破坏性方法确定的抗压强度之间存在准确的关系。此外,结果强调了SonReb方法在估计抗压强度方面的可靠性,为SFC砖的现场结构评估提供了有用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-destructive evaluation of solid fired clay brick strength using the SonReb method
This research explores potential non-destructive testing (NDT) methods for assessing the properties of solid fired clay (SFC) bricks in situ. Empirical correlations were established between the results from NDT and the compressive strength determined through traditional destructive testing (DT) techniques performed in a controlled laboratory setting. The research focuses on two specific NDT methods: the Rebound Hammer Test (RHT) and Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Test (UPV), alongside their integration into a combined approach referred to as the SonReb method. The RH method utilises the Q-value, a dimensionless parameter derived from the ratio between the kinetic energy measured of the reflected and forward hammer mass. The UPV test involves measuring the speed of ultrasonic waves travelling through the solid brick material. A total of 234 DT and 476 NDT were conducted on both modern and historical SFC bricks. The research accurately validates the application of the RHT on SFC bricks for determining compressive strength from the Q-value. Additionally, the study validates the SonReb method by testing SFC bricks and comparing the experimental compressive strength NDT value with obtained through DT. A novel empirical equation is proposed to estimate the compressive strength of the SFC bricks based on the SonReb method. Findings demonstrate an accurate relationship between NDT readings and the compressive strength determined by destructive methods on SFC bricks. Moreover, the results emphasise the reliability of the SonReb method in estimating compressive strength, providing a useful tool for in situ structural assessment of SFC bricks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Construction and Building Materials
Construction and Building Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
21.60%
发文量
3632
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged. Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信