澳大利亚亚热带放牧系统牧草更新方式对产量和土壤的影响

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
A.J. Gibson , M.J.DuV. Gout , N.M. Sutherland , L. Kearney , T.J. Rose
{"title":"澳大利亚亚热带放牧系统牧草更新方式对产量和土壤的影响","authors":"A.J. Gibson ,&nbsp;M.J.DuV. Gout ,&nbsp;N.M. Sutherland ,&nbsp;L. Kearney ,&nbsp;T.J. Rose","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pasture renovation is widely used to increase biomass production and feed quality through establishment of favourable species, while it can also contribute to improved soil health. There are a number of pasture establishment methods available, however their efficacy for establishing an annual winter feed base has not been compared in subtropical grazing systems of Australia. This study investigated pasture biomass, species composition, soil function and SOC in a subtropical pasture over two seasons where a winter pasture species mix was sown annually. The effect of a direct drill tyned seeder, under sowing (Einböck), minimal disturbance strip tillage (Soilkee Renovator) or mulch and broadcast, compared to an un-sown control. Biomass was harvested from plots in line with the grazing rotation of the paddock, and soils were sampled to 10 cm depth annually in 2021, 2022 and 2023. All establishment methods produced significantly more biomass than the control in both years, but could not be statistically separated from each other. Species composition was variable between the establishment methods with the Soilkee treatment allowing establishment of more legumes and herbs than the other methods. No significant differences were found in soil function or soil organic carbon in any sampling year. Given the limited differences of establishment methods on pasture performance, the use of the lowest cost or readily available method is recommended. In most circumstances, this will be mulch and broadcast which also minimises soil disturbance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"253 ","pages":"Article 106670"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Yield and soil impacts of pasture renovation methods in an australian subtropical grazing system\",\"authors\":\"A.J. Gibson ,&nbsp;M.J.DuV. Gout ,&nbsp;N.M. Sutherland ,&nbsp;L. Kearney ,&nbsp;T.J. Rose\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.still.2025.106670\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Pasture renovation is widely used to increase biomass production and feed quality through establishment of favourable species, while it can also contribute to improved soil health. There are a number of pasture establishment methods available, however their efficacy for establishing an annual winter feed base has not been compared in subtropical grazing systems of Australia. This study investigated pasture biomass, species composition, soil function and SOC in a subtropical pasture over two seasons where a winter pasture species mix was sown annually. The effect of a direct drill tyned seeder, under sowing (Einböck), minimal disturbance strip tillage (Soilkee Renovator) or mulch and broadcast, compared to an un-sown control. Biomass was harvested from plots in line with the grazing rotation of the paddock, and soils were sampled to 10 cm depth annually in 2021, 2022 and 2023. All establishment methods produced significantly more biomass than the control in both years, but could not be statistically separated from each other. Species composition was variable between the establishment methods with the Soilkee treatment allowing establishment of more legumes and herbs than the other methods. No significant differences were found in soil function or soil organic carbon in any sampling year. Given the limited differences of establishment methods on pasture performance, the use of the lowest cost or readily available method is recommended. In most circumstances, this will be mulch and broadcast which also minimises soil disturbance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"volume\":\"253 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106670\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725002247\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725002247","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牧草改造被广泛用于通过建立有利物种来增加生物质产量和饲料质量,同时也有助于改善土壤健康。目前有许多可行的牧草建立方法,但它们在澳大利亚亚热带放牧系统中建立年度冬季饲料基地的效果尚未得到比较。本研究对每年播种冬季牧草混种的亚热带牧草生物量、物种组成、土壤功能和有机碳进行了研究。与未播种对照相比,直接播种机,播种下(Einböck),最小干扰条带耕作(Soilkee Renovator)或覆盖和播种机的效果。在2021年、2022年和2023年,根据围场的放牧轮作从样地收获生物量,每年对土壤取样至10 cm深度。在这两个年份,所有建立方法产生的生物量都显著高于对照,但彼此之间无法统计分离。物种组成在不同的建立方法之间存在差异,Soilkee处理比其他方法允许建立更多的豆类和草本植物。各采样年土壤功能和土壤有机碳含量均无显著差异。考虑到不同的建立方法对牧草生产性能的影响有限,建议使用成本最低或容易获得的方法。在大多数情况下,这将是覆盖和播撒,也尽量减少对土壤的干扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Yield and soil impacts of pasture renovation methods in an australian subtropical grazing system
Pasture renovation is widely used to increase biomass production and feed quality through establishment of favourable species, while it can also contribute to improved soil health. There are a number of pasture establishment methods available, however their efficacy for establishing an annual winter feed base has not been compared in subtropical grazing systems of Australia. This study investigated pasture biomass, species composition, soil function and SOC in a subtropical pasture over two seasons where a winter pasture species mix was sown annually. The effect of a direct drill tyned seeder, under sowing (Einböck), minimal disturbance strip tillage (Soilkee Renovator) or mulch and broadcast, compared to an un-sown control. Biomass was harvested from plots in line with the grazing rotation of the paddock, and soils were sampled to 10 cm depth annually in 2021, 2022 and 2023. All establishment methods produced significantly more biomass than the control in both years, but could not be statistically separated from each other. Species composition was variable between the establishment methods with the Soilkee treatment allowing establishment of more legumes and herbs than the other methods. No significant differences were found in soil function or soil organic carbon in any sampling year. Given the limited differences of establishment methods on pasture performance, the use of the lowest cost or readily available method is recommended. In most circumstances, this will be mulch and broadcast which also minimises soil disturbance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信