Martin Zielina , Dominika Matysková , Jiří Štětinský , Robert Zajíček , Jaroslava Raudenská , Alena Javůrková , Kristína Sakmárová , Martin Modrák
{"title":"捷克烧伤患者烧伤特异性疼痛焦虑量表(BSPAS)的翻译、适应和心理测量学评估","authors":"Martin Zielina , Dominika Matysková , Jiří Štětinský , Robert Zajíček , Jaroslava Raudenská , Alena Javůrková , Kristína Sakmárová , Martin Modrák","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to adapt the Burn-Specific Pain Anxiety Scale (BSPAS) for use in the Czech language and evaluate its validity and reliability. Conducted across three university hospitals in the Czech Republic—Prague, Brno, and Ostrava—from September 2022 to February 2024, the study involved 203 inpatients and outpatients from burn units who met inclusion criteria and consented to participate. The adaptation process included rigorous analysis of validity and reliability, employing language, content, and construct validity assessments. Language validity was ensured through back translation, whereas content validity was confirmed through expert evaluations. Exploratory factor analysis revealed at least a two-factor structure with satisfactory factor loading. Loading of factors to questions was consistent between BSPAS-9 and BSPAS-5. Confirmatory factor analysis further substantiated the model fit for both five- and nine-item versions (RMSEA 0.06 and 0.1 respectively). Internal consistency was assessed using item-total correlation, yielding acceptable results (range 0.63–0.82 for nine items and 0.71–0.82 for five items). Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.94 for the nine-item version and 0.91 for the five-item version. These findings indicate that the Czech version of the BSPAS is a valid and reliable tool for assessing pain-related anxiety in patients with burns. Additionally, we show that in our population, the information from the nine-item version is well captured by the five-item version and pain alone explains most of the variance in BSPAS scores.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 107546"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translation, adaptation, and psychometric evaluation of the Burn-Specific Pain Anxiety Scale (BSPAS) for Czech patients with burn injuries\",\"authors\":\"Martin Zielina , Dominika Matysková , Jiří Štětinský , Robert Zajíček , Jaroslava Raudenská , Alena Javůrková , Kristína Sakmárová , Martin Modrák\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study aimed to adapt the Burn-Specific Pain Anxiety Scale (BSPAS) for use in the Czech language and evaluate its validity and reliability. Conducted across three university hospitals in the Czech Republic—Prague, Brno, and Ostrava—from September 2022 to February 2024, the study involved 203 inpatients and outpatients from burn units who met inclusion criteria and consented to participate. The adaptation process included rigorous analysis of validity and reliability, employing language, content, and construct validity assessments. Language validity was ensured through back translation, whereas content validity was confirmed through expert evaluations. Exploratory factor analysis revealed at least a two-factor structure with satisfactory factor loading. Loading of factors to questions was consistent between BSPAS-9 and BSPAS-5. Confirmatory factor analysis further substantiated the model fit for both five- and nine-item versions (RMSEA 0.06 and 0.1 respectively). Internal consistency was assessed using item-total correlation, yielding acceptable results (range 0.63–0.82 for nine items and 0.71–0.82 for five items). Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.94 for the nine-item version and 0.91 for the five-item version. These findings indicate that the Czech version of the BSPAS is a valid and reliable tool for assessing pain-related anxiety in patients with burns. Additionally, we show that in our population, the information from the nine-item version is well captured by the five-item version and pain alone explains most of the variance in BSPAS scores.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Burns\",\"volume\":\"51 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 107546\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Burns\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417925001755\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417925001755","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Translation, adaptation, and psychometric evaluation of the Burn-Specific Pain Anxiety Scale (BSPAS) for Czech patients with burn injuries
This study aimed to adapt the Burn-Specific Pain Anxiety Scale (BSPAS) for use in the Czech language and evaluate its validity and reliability. Conducted across three university hospitals in the Czech Republic—Prague, Brno, and Ostrava—from September 2022 to February 2024, the study involved 203 inpatients and outpatients from burn units who met inclusion criteria and consented to participate. The adaptation process included rigorous analysis of validity and reliability, employing language, content, and construct validity assessments. Language validity was ensured through back translation, whereas content validity was confirmed through expert evaluations. Exploratory factor analysis revealed at least a two-factor structure with satisfactory factor loading. Loading of factors to questions was consistent between BSPAS-9 and BSPAS-5. Confirmatory factor analysis further substantiated the model fit for both five- and nine-item versions (RMSEA 0.06 and 0.1 respectively). Internal consistency was assessed using item-total correlation, yielding acceptable results (range 0.63–0.82 for nine items and 0.71–0.82 for five items). Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.94 for the nine-item version and 0.91 for the five-item version. These findings indicate that the Czech version of the BSPAS is a valid and reliable tool for assessing pain-related anxiety in patients with burns. Additionally, we show that in our population, the information from the nine-item version is well captured by the five-item version and pain alone explains most of the variance in BSPAS scores.
期刊介绍:
Burns aims to foster the exchange of information among all engaged in preventing and treating the effects of burns. The journal focuses on clinical, scientific and social aspects of these injuries and covers the prevention of the injury, the epidemiology of such injuries and all aspects of treatment including development of new techniques and technologies and verification of existing ones. Regular features include clinical and scientific papers, state of the art reviews and descriptions of burn-care in practice.
Topics covered by Burns include: the effects of smoke on man and animals, their tissues and cells; the responses to and treatment of patients and animals with chemical injuries to the skin; the biological and clinical effects of cold injuries; surgical techniques which are, or may be relevant to the treatment of burned patients during the acute or reconstructive phase following injury; well controlled laboratory studies of the effectiveness of anti-microbial agents on infection and new materials on scarring and healing; inflammatory responses to injury, effectiveness of related agents and other compounds used to modify the physiological and cellular responses to the injury; experimental studies of burns and the outcome of burn wound healing; regenerative medicine concerning the skin.