一个不熟悉的策略的高框架提高了概念性学习,但与低框架和策略自由相比,降低了乐趣

IF 8.9 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Conrad Borchers , Hendrik Fleischer , Sascha Schanze , Katharina Scheiter , Vincent Aleven
{"title":"一个不熟悉的策略的高框架提高了概念性学习,但与低框架和策略自由相比,降低了乐趣","authors":"Conrad Borchers ,&nbsp;Hendrik Fleischer ,&nbsp;Sascha Schanze ,&nbsp;Katharina Scheiter ,&nbsp;Vincent Aleven","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Adaptive learning systems support students in acquiring complex skills, provided they deliver appropriate instructional support, such as scaffolding. Few studies have examined whether the optimal level of scaffolding depends on the system's support for strategies familiar to the learner—a situation that often arises when students use software developed abroad or aligned with a different curriculum. The present study experimentally compared learning outcomes from two American tutoring systems, StoichTutor and ORCCA, which provide differing levels of scaffolding, in a German population. Prior research predicts that learners would benefit more from a system with flexible support of their native problem-solving approach but provides less scaffolding. To test this prediction, we conducted a crossover experiment involving 61 German undergraduates enrolled in remedial first-year university chemistry preparatory courses. Procedural and conceptual learning were evaluated alongside self-efficacy and usability perceptions. Both tutoring systems significantly promoted procedural learning. However, only the highly scaffolded tutoring system yielded significant conceptual learning gains. Log data analysis revealed that the highly scaffolded system provided more opportunities for students to practice and receive feedback on unit analysis and substance operations. These opportunities corresponded to condition-specific learning gain differences in the underlying conceptual skills. Students significantly preferred working with the highly scaffolded system. These findings suggest that highly scaffolded systems can improve conceptual understanding, even when learners are unfamiliar with the scaffolded strategy. The practical significance of this finding is that, adapting tutoring systems outside of the United States, language translation may suffice to benefit novice learners through scaffolded, adaptive instruction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"236 ","pages":"Article 105364"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High scaffolding of an unfamiliar strategy improves conceptual learning but reduces enjoyment compared to low scaffolding and strategy freedom\",\"authors\":\"Conrad Borchers ,&nbsp;Hendrik Fleischer ,&nbsp;Sascha Schanze ,&nbsp;Katharina Scheiter ,&nbsp;Vincent Aleven\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Adaptive learning systems support students in acquiring complex skills, provided they deliver appropriate instructional support, such as scaffolding. Few studies have examined whether the optimal level of scaffolding depends on the system's support for strategies familiar to the learner—a situation that often arises when students use software developed abroad or aligned with a different curriculum. The present study experimentally compared learning outcomes from two American tutoring systems, StoichTutor and ORCCA, which provide differing levels of scaffolding, in a German population. Prior research predicts that learners would benefit more from a system with flexible support of their native problem-solving approach but provides less scaffolding. To test this prediction, we conducted a crossover experiment involving 61 German undergraduates enrolled in remedial first-year university chemistry preparatory courses. Procedural and conceptual learning were evaluated alongside self-efficacy and usability perceptions. Both tutoring systems significantly promoted procedural learning. However, only the highly scaffolded tutoring system yielded significant conceptual learning gains. Log data analysis revealed that the highly scaffolded system provided more opportunities for students to practice and receive feedback on unit analysis and substance operations. These opportunities corresponded to condition-specific learning gain differences in the underlying conceptual skills. Students significantly preferred working with the highly scaffolded system. These findings suggest that highly scaffolded systems can improve conceptual understanding, even when learners are unfamiliar with the scaffolded strategy. The practical significance of this finding is that, adapting tutoring systems outside of the United States, language translation may suffice to benefit novice learners through scaffolded, adaptive instruction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Education\",\"volume\":\"236 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105364\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131525001320\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131525001320","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

适应性学习系统支持学生获得复杂的技能,只要他们提供适当的教学支持,比如脚手架。很少有研究考察最佳的辅助水平是否取决于系统对学习者熟悉的策略的支持——当学生使用国外开发的软件或与不同的课程相结合时,这种情况经常出现。本研究通过实验比较了两种美国家教系统(StoichTutor和ORCCA)在德国人群中的学习效果,这两种系统提供了不同程度的脚手架。先前的研究预测,学习者将受益于一个灵活的系统,支持他们的原生解决问题的方法,但提供更少的脚手架。为了验证这一预测,我们进行了一项交叉实验,涉及61名参加大学一年级补习班化学预备课程的德国本科生。程序学习和概念学习与自我效能感和可用性感知一起进行评估。两种辅导系统都显著促进了程序性学习。然而,只有高度搭建的辅导系统产生了显著的概念学习收益。日志数据分析表明,高度脚手架的系统为学生提供了更多的练习机会,并获得了单元分析和物质操作的反馈。这些机会对应于特定条件下的学习在潜在的概念技能上获得差异。学生们明显更喜欢在高度脚手架式的系统中工作。这些发现表明,即使学习者不熟悉支架策略,高度支架系统也可以提高概念理解。这一发现的实际意义在于,适应美国以外的辅导系统,语言翻译可能足以使新手学习者受益,通过脚手架,适应性教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
High scaffolding of an unfamiliar strategy improves conceptual learning but reduces enjoyment compared to low scaffolding and strategy freedom
Adaptive learning systems support students in acquiring complex skills, provided they deliver appropriate instructional support, such as scaffolding. Few studies have examined whether the optimal level of scaffolding depends on the system's support for strategies familiar to the learner—a situation that often arises when students use software developed abroad or aligned with a different curriculum. The present study experimentally compared learning outcomes from two American tutoring systems, StoichTutor and ORCCA, which provide differing levels of scaffolding, in a German population. Prior research predicts that learners would benefit more from a system with flexible support of their native problem-solving approach but provides less scaffolding. To test this prediction, we conducted a crossover experiment involving 61 German undergraduates enrolled in remedial first-year university chemistry preparatory courses. Procedural and conceptual learning were evaluated alongside self-efficacy and usability perceptions. Both tutoring systems significantly promoted procedural learning. However, only the highly scaffolded tutoring system yielded significant conceptual learning gains. Log data analysis revealed that the highly scaffolded system provided more opportunities for students to practice and receive feedback on unit analysis and substance operations. These opportunities corresponded to condition-specific learning gain differences in the underlying conceptual skills. Students significantly preferred working with the highly scaffolded system. These findings suggest that highly scaffolded systems can improve conceptual understanding, even when learners are unfamiliar with the scaffolded strategy. The practical significance of this finding is that, adapting tutoring systems outside of the United States, language translation may suffice to benefit novice learners through scaffolded, adaptive instruction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信