{"title":"少数民族压力与丧亲:社会定位对LGBTQ+丧亲体验的影响","authors":"Felicity Johnson , Kristin Bindley","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This scoping review explores how the social positioning of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and queer (LGBTQ+) persons impacts their bereavement experiences. Drawing on the key concepts of minority stress and intersectionality, LGBTQ+ bereavement is examined through a social constructionist lens. Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) scoping review method is employed to map the existing research on LGBTQ+ bereavement published between 2003 and 2023, with specific interest in how this research discusses the impact of identity on bereavement. Findings are presented in four themes: (1) Systemic barriers, (2) Complexities of (not) disclosing identity, (3) Minimising of loss, and (4) LGBTQ+ community dis/connection. Employing reflexive thematic analysis to support critical interpretation, findings are explored through the lens of social constructionism, before critiquing the evident lack of intersectional approaches to research in current LGBTQ+ bereavement literature. Findings indicate several gaps in the LGBTQ+ bereavement literature, and the need for further research in this area to be conceptualised and guided by an intersectional approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"380 ","pages":"Article 118186"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minority stress and bereavement: The impact of social positioning on LGBTQ+ bereavement experiences\",\"authors\":\"Felicity Johnson , Kristin Bindley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This scoping review explores how the social positioning of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and queer (LGBTQ+) persons impacts their bereavement experiences. Drawing on the key concepts of minority stress and intersectionality, LGBTQ+ bereavement is examined through a social constructionist lens. Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) scoping review method is employed to map the existing research on LGBTQ+ bereavement published between 2003 and 2023, with specific interest in how this research discusses the impact of identity on bereavement. Findings are presented in four themes: (1) Systemic barriers, (2) Complexities of (not) disclosing identity, (3) Minimising of loss, and (4) LGBTQ+ community dis/connection. Employing reflexive thematic analysis to support critical interpretation, findings are explored through the lens of social constructionism, before critiquing the evident lack of intersectional approaches to research in current LGBTQ+ bereavement literature. Findings indicate several gaps in the LGBTQ+ bereavement literature, and the need for further research in this area to be conceptualised and guided by an intersectional approach.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"380 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625005167\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625005167","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这篇综述探讨了女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿(LGBTQ+)群体的社会定位如何影响他们的丧亲经历。借鉴少数群体压力和交叉性的关键概念,LGBTQ+丧亲之痛是通过社会建构主义的视角来审视的。本文采用Arksey and O’malley(2005)的scoping review方法,对2003年至2023年间发表的关于LGBTQ+丧亲的现有研究进行了映射,并对该研究如何讨论身份对丧亲的影响特别感兴趣。研究结果分为四个主题:(1)系统障碍;(2)(不)披露身份的复杂性;(3)最小化损失;(4)LGBTQ+社区脱节。本文采用反身性主题分析来支持批判性解读,通过社会建构主义的视角对研究结果进行了探索,然后对当前LGBTQ+丧亲文献中明显缺乏交叉研究方法进行了批评。研究结果表明,LGBTQ+丧亲文献中存在一些空白,需要在这一领域进行进一步的研究,并以交叉方法进行概念化和指导。
Minority stress and bereavement: The impact of social positioning on LGBTQ+ bereavement experiences
This scoping review explores how the social positioning of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and queer (LGBTQ+) persons impacts their bereavement experiences. Drawing on the key concepts of minority stress and intersectionality, LGBTQ+ bereavement is examined through a social constructionist lens. Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) scoping review method is employed to map the existing research on LGBTQ+ bereavement published between 2003 and 2023, with specific interest in how this research discusses the impact of identity on bereavement. Findings are presented in four themes: (1) Systemic barriers, (2) Complexities of (not) disclosing identity, (3) Minimising of loss, and (4) LGBTQ+ community dis/connection. Employing reflexive thematic analysis to support critical interpretation, findings are explored through the lens of social constructionism, before critiquing the evident lack of intersectional approaches to research in current LGBTQ+ bereavement literature. Findings indicate several gaps in the LGBTQ+ bereavement literature, and the need for further research in this area to be conceptualised and guided by an intersectional approach.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.