Lauren E. Burton , Arthur M. Oldeman , Alan M. Haywood , Julia C. Tindall , Aisling M. Dolan , Daniel J. Hill , Anna von der Heydt , Michiel L.J. Baatsen
{"title":"对上新世的评估是我们未来变暖的模拟","authors":"Lauren E. Burton , Arthur M. Oldeman , Alan M. Haywood , Julia C. Tindall , Aisling M. Dolan , Daniel J. Hill , Anna von der Heydt , Michiel L.J. Baatsen","doi":"10.1016/j.gloplacha.2025.104860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Pliocene has been considered a possible palaeoclimate analogue for over four decades and is often referred to as the “best” analogue for the end-of-century future. Using elements of a newly proposed palaeoclimate analogy framework, we critically assess the Pliocene as an analogue for our warmer future using data from the Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project (PlioMIP) and Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) scenarios from the Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Three future intervals are considered: near term (2021–2040), medium term (2041–2060), and long term (2081–2100).</div><div>The strength of the Pliocene as an analogue is found to be highly dependent on a number of factors, including the climate variable and the spatial and temporal scales of interest. Warming under medium emission scenarios (SSP2-4.5 and SSP3-7.0) by the end of this century is found to be the most analogous to the Pliocene, though there is significant variation both between models and between regions on the level of analogy. While increases in Pliocene surface air temperature are found to be analogous to some future scenarios, changes in precipitation are less analogous between the Pliocene and projected futures, particularly in terms of the spatial patterns of change. Using sensitivity experiments, we show that the regions of greatest difference between the Pliocene and projected future(s) are largely attributable to non-CO<sub>2</sub> Pliocene boundary conditions, such as reduced land ice and closed Arctic Ocean gateways.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55089,"journal":{"name":"Global and Planetary Change","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 104860"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An assessment of the Pliocene as an analogue for our warmer future\",\"authors\":\"Lauren E. Burton , Arthur M. Oldeman , Alan M. Haywood , Julia C. Tindall , Aisling M. Dolan , Daniel J. Hill , Anna von der Heydt , Michiel L.J. Baatsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gloplacha.2025.104860\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Pliocene has been considered a possible palaeoclimate analogue for over four decades and is often referred to as the “best” analogue for the end-of-century future. Using elements of a newly proposed palaeoclimate analogy framework, we critically assess the Pliocene as an analogue for our warmer future using data from the Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project (PlioMIP) and Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) scenarios from the Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Three future intervals are considered: near term (2021–2040), medium term (2041–2060), and long term (2081–2100).</div><div>The strength of the Pliocene as an analogue is found to be highly dependent on a number of factors, including the climate variable and the spatial and temporal scales of interest. Warming under medium emission scenarios (SSP2-4.5 and SSP3-7.0) by the end of this century is found to be the most analogous to the Pliocene, though there is significant variation both between models and between regions on the level of analogy. While increases in Pliocene surface air temperature are found to be analogous to some future scenarios, changes in precipitation are less analogous between the Pliocene and projected futures, particularly in terms of the spatial patterns of change. Using sensitivity experiments, we show that the regions of greatest difference between the Pliocene and projected future(s) are largely attributable to non-CO<sub>2</sub> Pliocene boundary conditions, such as reduced land ice and closed Arctic Ocean gateways.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global and Planetary Change\",\"volume\":\"252 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104860\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global and Planetary Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921818125001699\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global and Planetary Change","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921818125001699","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
An assessment of the Pliocene as an analogue for our warmer future
The Pliocene has been considered a possible palaeoclimate analogue for over four decades and is often referred to as the “best” analogue for the end-of-century future. Using elements of a newly proposed palaeoclimate analogy framework, we critically assess the Pliocene as an analogue for our warmer future using data from the Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project (PlioMIP) and Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) scenarios from the Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Three future intervals are considered: near term (2021–2040), medium term (2041–2060), and long term (2081–2100).
The strength of the Pliocene as an analogue is found to be highly dependent on a number of factors, including the climate variable and the spatial and temporal scales of interest. Warming under medium emission scenarios (SSP2-4.5 and SSP3-7.0) by the end of this century is found to be the most analogous to the Pliocene, though there is significant variation both between models and between regions on the level of analogy. While increases in Pliocene surface air temperature are found to be analogous to some future scenarios, changes in precipitation are less analogous between the Pliocene and projected futures, particularly in terms of the spatial patterns of change. Using sensitivity experiments, we show that the regions of greatest difference between the Pliocene and projected future(s) are largely attributable to non-CO2 Pliocene boundary conditions, such as reduced land ice and closed Arctic Ocean gateways.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the journal Global and Planetary Change is to provide a multi-disciplinary overview of the processes taking place in the Earth System and involved in planetary change over time. The journal focuses on records of the past and current state of the earth system, and future scenarios , and their link to global environmental change. Regional or process-oriented studies are welcome if they discuss global implications. Topics include, but are not limited to, changes in the dynamics and composition of the atmosphere, oceans and cryosphere, as well as climate change, sea level variation, observations/modelling of Earth processes from deep to (near-)surface and their coupling, global ecology, biogeography and the resilience/thresholds in ecosystems.
Key criteria for the consideration of manuscripts are (a) the relevance for the global scientific community and/or (b) the wider implications for global scale problems, preferably combined with (c) having a significance beyond a single discipline. A clear focus on key processes associated with planetary scale change is strongly encouraged.
Manuscripts can be submitted as either research contributions or as a review article. Every effort should be made towards the presentation of research outcomes in an understandable way for a broad readership.