Yasin Hasan Balcioglu , Melih Avci , Fatih Oncu , Mehmet Sinan Iyisoy , Sakir Gica , Jonas Forsman , Howard Ryland
{"title":"土耳其精神疾病法医精神病患者住院攻击风险因素及新预测模型的前瞻性研究","authors":"Yasin Hasan Balcioglu , Melih Avci , Fatih Oncu , Mehmet Sinan Iyisoy , Sakir Gica , Jonas Forsman , Howard Ryland","doi":"10.1016/j.ajp.2025.104538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Aggression among psychiatric inpatients causes harm and disrupts care. While often linked to modifiable risk factors, their role remains unclear, and many prediction tools overlook them. This study aimed to assess the relationship between risk factors and inpatient aggression among forensic patients with psychotic disorders in Turkiye and to develop a population-specific prediction model.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eight static and ten dynamic risk factors were assessed. Dynamic factors were collected fortnightly, with the outcome defined as any physical or verbal aggression between assessment rounds. Multilevel logistic regression analyses assessed the association between dynamic risk factors and outcomes. A new population-specific prediction model was developed by refitting the previously developed elsewhere (FOxWeb). Models incorporating fixed effects were used to assess predictive performance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Over four months, 102 forensic psychiatric inpatients underwent 811 dynamic risk assessments, with 603 aggressive incidents recorded. Forty-two patients were involved in at least one incident. Many dynamic factors were significantly associated with outcomes in both univariable and multivariable analyses. The total dynamic score was a significant predictor, improving the discrimination of the fixed-effects model (AUC = 0.84, 95 % CI: 0.81–0.87) compared to the model using static factors alone (AUC=0.73, 95 % CI: 0.69–0.77).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Combining dynamic and static factors in the prediction model showed strong performance for assessing aggression risk. Refitting existing prediction models to specific populations may offer enhanced performance, but this requires external validation in independent samples as development models may be overfitted. Highly quality predicative models could enhance interventions, optimize resource use, and improve clinical decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8543,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of psychiatry","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 104538"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A prospective study of risk factors and new prediction model for inpatient aggression in a Turkish forensic psychiatric cohort with psychotic illness\",\"authors\":\"Yasin Hasan Balcioglu , Melih Avci , Fatih Oncu , Mehmet Sinan Iyisoy , Sakir Gica , Jonas Forsman , Howard Ryland\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajp.2025.104538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Aggression among psychiatric inpatients causes harm and disrupts care. While often linked to modifiable risk factors, their role remains unclear, and many prediction tools overlook them. This study aimed to assess the relationship between risk factors and inpatient aggression among forensic patients with psychotic disorders in Turkiye and to develop a population-specific prediction model.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eight static and ten dynamic risk factors were assessed. Dynamic factors were collected fortnightly, with the outcome defined as any physical or verbal aggression between assessment rounds. Multilevel logistic regression analyses assessed the association between dynamic risk factors and outcomes. A new population-specific prediction model was developed by refitting the previously developed elsewhere (FOxWeb). Models incorporating fixed effects were used to assess predictive performance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Over four months, 102 forensic psychiatric inpatients underwent 811 dynamic risk assessments, with 603 aggressive incidents recorded. Forty-two patients were involved in at least one incident. Many dynamic factors were significantly associated with outcomes in both univariable and multivariable analyses. The total dynamic score was a significant predictor, improving the discrimination of the fixed-effects model (AUC = 0.84, 95 % CI: 0.81–0.87) compared to the model using static factors alone (AUC=0.73, 95 % CI: 0.69–0.77).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Combining dynamic and static factors in the prediction model showed strong performance for assessing aggression risk. Refitting existing prediction models to specific populations may offer enhanced performance, but this requires external validation in independent samples as development models may be overfitted. Highly quality predicative models could enhance interventions, optimize resource use, and improve clinical decision-making.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian journal of psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"109 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104538\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian journal of psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876201825001819\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876201825001819","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A prospective study of risk factors and new prediction model for inpatient aggression in a Turkish forensic psychiatric cohort with psychotic illness
Background
Aggression among psychiatric inpatients causes harm and disrupts care. While often linked to modifiable risk factors, their role remains unclear, and many prediction tools overlook them. This study aimed to assess the relationship between risk factors and inpatient aggression among forensic patients with psychotic disorders in Turkiye and to develop a population-specific prediction model.
Methods
Eight static and ten dynamic risk factors were assessed. Dynamic factors were collected fortnightly, with the outcome defined as any physical or verbal aggression between assessment rounds. Multilevel logistic regression analyses assessed the association between dynamic risk factors and outcomes. A new population-specific prediction model was developed by refitting the previously developed elsewhere (FOxWeb). Models incorporating fixed effects were used to assess predictive performance.
Results
Over four months, 102 forensic psychiatric inpatients underwent 811 dynamic risk assessments, with 603 aggressive incidents recorded. Forty-two patients were involved in at least one incident. Many dynamic factors were significantly associated with outcomes in both univariable and multivariable analyses. The total dynamic score was a significant predictor, improving the discrimination of the fixed-effects model (AUC = 0.84, 95 % CI: 0.81–0.87) compared to the model using static factors alone (AUC=0.73, 95 % CI: 0.69–0.77).
Conclusion
Combining dynamic and static factors in the prediction model showed strong performance for assessing aggression risk. Refitting existing prediction models to specific populations may offer enhanced performance, but this requires external validation in independent samples as development models may be overfitted. Highly quality predicative models could enhance interventions, optimize resource use, and improve clinical decision-making.
期刊介绍:
The Asian Journal of Psychiatry serves as a comprehensive resource for psychiatrists, mental health clinicians, neurologists, physicians, mental health students, and policymakers. Its goal is to facilitate the exchange of research findings and clinical practices between Asia and the global community. The journal focuses on psychiatric research relevant to Asia, covering preclinical, clinical, service system, and policy development topics. It also highlights the socio-cultural diversity of the region in relation to mental health.