将废物转化为资源:红泥作为地面套管固井中G类水泥的可持续替代品

IF 3.7 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ahmed Abdulhamid Mahmoud*, 
{"title":"将废物转化为资源:红泥作为地面套管固井中G类水泥的可持续替代品","authors":"Ahmed Abdulhamid Mahmoud*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsomega.4c1160110.1021/acsomega.4c11601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Sustainability of well cementing operations is a growing concern due to the high carbon footprint of Class G cement production. This study investigates the feasibility of using red mud, an industrial by-product of alumina manufacturing, as a partial replacement for Class G cement in surface casing cementing. A series of laboratory experiments was conducted to evaluate the mechanical, rheological, and performance characteristics of red mud-based cement slurries. The tests included compressive strength, plastic viscosity, yield point, gel strength, 3-rpm reading, free water content, fluid loss, and thickening time. A comparison of red mud–cement blends to a conventional Class G cement slurry was also considered in this study. The results demonstrated that the incorporation of red mud in a concentration of more than 15% resulted in crack development on the outer surface of the samples with time, and also the sample with 50% red mud showed a very high plastic viscosity, which makes it unpumpable. Red mud incorporation significantly reduced the free water content while maintaining an acceptable compressive strength above the required 700 psi threshold. However, its addition lowered the yield point and gel strength, necessitating viscosifier inclusion to restore suspension capacity. The slurry with 15% red mud showed optimal performance when combined with 0.12% viscosifier, balancing pumpability, stability, and thickening time requirements. The findings highlight that red mud-based cement formulations can provide a sustainable alternative to Class G cement, reducing waste disposal challenges and environmental impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":22,"journal":{"name":"ACS Omega","volume":"10 20","pages":"20286–20298 20286–20298"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsomega.4c11601","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Turning Waste into Resource: Red Mud as a Sustainable Alternative to Class G Cement in Surface Casing Cementing\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Abdulhamid Mahmoud*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsomega.4c1160110.1021/acsomega.4c11601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Sustainability of well cementing operations is a growing concern due to the high carbon footprint of Class G cement production. This study investigates the feasibility of using red mud, an industrial by-product of alumina manufacturing, as a partial replacement for Class G cement in surface casing cementing. A series of laboratory experiments was conducted to evaluate the mechanical, rheological, and performance characteristics of red mud-based cement slurries. The tests included compressive strength, plastic viscosity, yield point, gel strength, 3-rpm reading, free water content, fluid loss, and thickening time. A comparison of red mud–cement blends to a conventional Class G cement slurry was also considered in this study. The results demonstrated that the incorporation of red mud in a concentration of more than 15% resulted in crack development on the outer surface of the samples with time, and also the sample with 50% red mud showed a very high plastic viscosity, which makes it unpumpable. Red mud incorporation significantly reduced the free water content while maintaining an acceptable compressive strength above the required 700 psi threshold. However, its addition lowered the yield point and gel strength, necessitating viscosifier inclusion to restore suspension capacity. The slurry with 15% red mud showed optimal performance when combined with 0.12% viscosifier, balancing pumpability, stability, and thickening time requirements. The findings highlight that red mud-based cement formulations can provide a sustainable alternative to Class G cement, reducing waste disposal challenges and environmental impact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Omega\",\"volume\":\"10 20\",\"pages\":\"20286–20298 20286–20298\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsomega.4c11601\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Omega\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.4c11601\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Omega","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.4c11601","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于G类水泥生产的高碳足迹,固井作业的可持续性日益受到关注。本研究探讨了在地面套管固井中使用赤泥作为部分替代G类水泥的可行性。赤泥是氧化铝生产的工业副产物。进行了一系列的实验室试验,以评估红泥基水泥浆的力学、流变学和性能特征。测试包括抗压强度、塑性粘度、屈服点、凝胶强度、3转/分读数、游离含水量、失液量和增稠时间。本研究还考虑了红泥-水泥混合物与常规G类水泥浆的比较。结果表明,当赤泥掺入浓度超过15%时,随着时间的推移,试样的外表面会出现裂缝,且赤泥掺入浓度达到50%时,试样的塑性粘度非常高,无法泵送。赤泥的掺入显著降低了自由含水量,同时保持了可接受的抗压强度,高于所需的700psi阈值。然而,它的加入降低了屈服点和凝胶强度,需要添加增粘剂来恢复悬浮能力。当添加0.12%的增粘剂时,掺15%赤泥的浆液在可泵性、稳定性和稠化时间要求方面表现最佳。研究结果强调,红泥基水泥配方可以提供G类水泥的可持续替代品,减少废物处理的挑战和对环境的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Turning Waste into Resource: Red Mud as a Sustainable Alternative to Class G Cement in Surface Casing Cementing

Sustainability of well cementing operations is a growing concern due to the high carbon footprint of Class G cement production. This study investigates the feasibility of using red mud, an industrial by-product of alumina manufacturing, as a partial replacement for Class G cement in surface casing cementing. A series of laboratory experiments was conducted to evaluate the mechanical, rheological, and performance characteristics of red mud-based cement slurries. The tests included compressive strength, plastic viscosity, yield point, gel strength, 3-rpm reading, free water content, fluid loss, and thickening time. A comparison of red mud–cement blends to a conventional Class G cement slurry was also considered in this study. The results demonstrated that the incorporation of red mud in a concentration of more than 15% resulted in crack development on the outer surface of the samples with time, and also the sample with 50% red mud showed a very high plastic viscosity, which makes it unpumpable. Red mud incorporation significantly reduced the free water content while maintaining an acceptable compressive strength above the required 700 psi threshold. However, its addition lowered the yield point and gel strength, necessitating viscosifier inclusion to restore suspension capacity. The slurry with 15% red mud showed optimal performance when combined with 0.12% viscosifier, balancing pumpability, stability, and thickening time requirements. The findings highlight that red mud-based cement formulations can provide a sustainable alternative to Class G cement, reducing waste disposal challenges and environmental impact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Omega
ACS Omega Chemical Engineering-General Chemical Engineering
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
3945
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: ACS Omega is an open-access global publication for scientific articles that describe new findings in chemistry and interfacing areas of science, without any perceived evaluation of immediate impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信