Xinyao Zhao, Ying Wang, Xingyu Wang, Li Han, Jinhu Yang, Yanli Zhang, Hongjie Zhang, Xiaorong Wu, Xiquan Wang, Lijun Li
{"title":"中国北方双季和再生燕麦管理下牧草产量与氮素利用的权衡研究","authors":"Xinyao Zhao, Ying Wang, Xingyu Wang, Li Han, Jinhu Yang, Yanli Zhang, Hongjie Zhang, Xiaorong Wu, Xiquan Wang, Lijun Li","doi":"10.1007/s11104-025-07555-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background and aims</h3><p>Double-cropped and regenerated crop managements have great potential to increase oat forage production through efficient utilization of water and solar resources. However, the interaction of crop management and the nitrogen (N) input on the forage yields, water and N use efficiency, as well as soil N content are not well documented.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A four-year field experiment was established with 0, 75, and 150 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> in the summer season under double-cropped and regenerated oat managements, and similar N inputs were in the previous spring season.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The double-cropped management increased forage yield and water use efficiency by 27–34% and 4–12% respectively in normal years, while it decreased total soil N content as well as nitrate and ammonium contents compared with the regenerated crop management. Low N input reduced the forage yield and soil N content in both crop managements, while it had higher N use efficiency (NUE). Applying 75 and 150 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> increased forage yield by 13–14% and 18–22%, respectively, whereas the former resulted in 11% higher NUE than the latter in both crop managements. Remarkably, due to the tradeoff between N yield and NUE, similar equivalent sustainable N management indexes were detected between N inputs, and their low values indicated other field managements to increase both forage yield and NUE simultaneously.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The double-cropped management demonstrates significant potential for improving forage yields, water and N use efficiencies, necessitating further efforts to optimize sustainable N management in oat production.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tradeoff between forage yield and nitrogen utilization under double-cropped and regenerated oat managements: a case study in northern China\",\"authors\":\"Xinyao Zhao, Ying Wang, Xingyu Wang, Li Han, Jinhu Yang, Yanli Zhang, Hongjie Zhang, Xiaorong Wu, Xiquan Wang, Lijun Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11104-025-07555-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background and aims</h3><p>Double-cropped and regenerated crop managements have great potential to increase oat forage production through efficient utilization of water and solar resources. However, the interaction of crop management and the nitrogen (N) input on the forage yields, water and N use efficiency, as well as soil N content are not well documented.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>A four-year field experiment was established with 0, 75, and 150 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> in the summer season under double-cropped and regenerated oat managements, and similar N inputs were in the previous spring season.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The double-cropped management increased forage yield and water use efficiency by 27–34% and 4–12% respectively in normal years, while it decreased total soil N content as well as nitrate and ammonium contents compared with the regenerated crop management. Low N input reduced the forage yield and soil N content in both crop managements, while it had higher N use efficiency (NUE). Applying 75 and 150 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> increased forage yield by 13–14% and 18–22%, respectively, whereas the former resulted in 11% higher NUE than the latter in both crop managements. Remarkably, due to the tradeoff between N yield and NUE, similar equivalent sustainable N management indexes were detected between N inputs, and their low values indicated other field managements to increase both forage yield and NUE simultaneously.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>The double-cropped management demonstrates significant potential for improving forage yields, water and N use efficiencies, necessitating further efforts to optimize sustainable N management in oat production.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":20223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-025-07555-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-025-07555-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景与目的通过对水分和太阳能资源的有效利用,双季作和再生作物管理在提高燕麦饲料产量方面具有很大的潜力。然而,作物管理和氮输入对饲料产量、水分和氮利用效率以及土壤氮含量的相互作用尚未得到很好的研究。方法设置4年大田试验,夏季双季和再生燕麦分别施氮量为0、75和150 kg hm - 1,春季施氮量相同。结果与再生作物管理相比,双季管理使牧草产量和水分利用效率分别提高了27-34%和4-12%,降低了土壤全氮含量、硝态氮和铵态氮含量。低氮投入降低了两种作物管理下的饲料产量和土壤氮含量,但提高了氮素利用效率(NUE)。在两种作物管理下,施用75和150 kg N ha - 1分别使牧草产量提高13-14%和18-22%,而前者的氮肥利用效率比后者高11%。值得注意的是,由于氮素产量和氮素利用效率之间的权衡,在不同的氮素投入之间发现了相似的等效可持续氮管理指数,它们的低值表明其他田间管理同时提高了牧草产量和氮素利用效率。结论双季管理在提高牧草产量、提高水分和氮利用效率方面具有显著潜力,需要进一步优化燕麦生产中氮的可持续管理。图形抽象
Tradeoff between forage yield and nitrogen utilization under double-cropped and regenerated oat managements: a case study in northern China
Background and aims
Double-cropped and regenerated crop managements have great potential to increase oat forage production through efficient utilization of water and solar resources. However, the interaction of crop management and the nitrogen (N) input on the forage yields, water and N use efficiency, as well as soil N content are not well documented.
Methods
A four-year field experiment was established with 0, 75, and 150 kg N ha−1 in the summer season under double-cropped and regenerated oat managements, and similar N inputs were in the previous spring season.
Results
The double-cropped management increased forage yield and water use efficiency by 27–34% and 4–12% respectively in normal years, while it decreased total soil N content as well as nitrate and ammonium contents compared with the regenerated crop management. Low N input reduced the forage yield and soil N content in both crop managements, while it had higher N use efficiency (NUE). Applying 75 and 150 kg N ha−1 increased forage yield by 13–14% and 18–22%, respectively, whereas the former resulted in 11% higher NUE than the latter in both crop managements. Remarkably, due to the tradeoff between N yield and NUE, similar equivalent sustainable N management indexes were detected between N inputs, and their low values indicated other field managements to increase both forage yield and NUE simultaneously.
Conclusion
The double-cropped management demonstrates significant potential for improving forage yields, water and N use efficiencies, necessitating further efforts to optimize sustainable N management in oat production.
期刊介绍:
Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.