Mette Yun Johansen,Cody Garett Durrer,Nanna Skytt Pilmark,Grit Elster Legaard,Kristian Karstoft,Katrine Bagge Hansen,Christopher Scott MacDonald,Thomas Peter Almdal,Jakob Bue Bjorner,Nicolai J Wewer Albrechtsen,Allan Arthur Vaag,Robin Christensen,Bente Klarlund Pedersen,Mathias Ried-Larsen
{"title":"2型糖尿病患者1年强化生活方式干预后6年血糖控制和心血管危险因素随访:随机u型大转弯试验的延伸","authors":"Mette Yun Johansen,Cody Garett Durrer,Nanna Skytt Pilmark,Grit Elster Legaard,Kristian Karstoft,Katrine Bagge Hansen,Christopher Scott MacDonald,Thomas Peter Almdal,Jakob Bue Bjorner,Nicolai J Wewer Albrechtsen,Allan Arthur Vaag,Robin Christensen,Bente Klarlund Pedersen,Mathias Ried-Larsen","doi":"10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nThis study aimed to describe the effects of a 1-year lifestyle intervention on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and cardiovascular risk factors 5 years after cessation of the lifestyle intervention in persons with type 2 diabetes (T2D).\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nFrom April 2015 to August 2016, 98 persons with T2D (duration < 10 years) were randomly allocated (2:1, stratified by sex) to a 1-year lifestyle intervention group (INT) (n = 64) or a standard care group (StC) (n = 34). All participants received standard care with blinded, target-driven medical therapy. INT included up to 5-6 weekly supervised aerobic and strength training sessions and dietary plans targeting a body mass index ≤ 25 kg/m². No intervention was given during the follow-up period. Forty-nine (77%) and 19 (56%) participants in INT and StC attended the 6-year follow-up. Based on the original intention-to-treat population, the primary outcome was the change in HbA1c from baseline to 6-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included weight, Low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, blood pressure (BP), and cardiorespiratory fitness.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nNinety-eight participants (mean age 54.6 years; 46% women; mean baseline Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c): 49.8 mmol/mol) were analyzed. HbA1c changed 6% and 13% in the INT and StC from baseline to 6-year follow-up (between group difference: -6% (95%CI: -14 to 3); p = 0.18). While no differences were observed for most secondary outcomes, the diastolic BP decreased 6.0 (95%CI: 2.1 to 9.8) mmHg more in the StC compared to INT.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe sustained effect of the lifestyle intervention on glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors was marginal, and it was surprisingly associated with inferior diastolic BP regulation.","PeriodicalId":48897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport and Health Science","volume":"45 1","pages":"101059"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Six-year follow-up of glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors after a one-year intensive lifestyle intervention in type 2 diabetes: An extension of the randomized U-TURN trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mette Yun Johansen,Cody Garett Durrer,Nanna Skytt Pilmark,Grit Elster Legaard,Kristian Karstoft,Katrine Bagge Hansen,Christopher Scott MacDonald,Thomas Peter Almdal,Jakob Bue Bjorner,Nicolai J Wewer Albrechtsen,Allan Arthur Vaag,Robin Christensen,Bente Klarlund Pedersen,Mathias Ried-Larsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\r\\nThis study aimed to describe the effects of a 1-year lifestyle intervention on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and cardiovascular risk factors 5 years after cessation of the lifestyle intervention in persons with type 2 diabetes (T2D).\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nFrom April 2015 to August 2016, 98 persons with T2D (duration < 10 years) were randomly allocated (2:1, stratified by sex) to a 1-year lifestyle intervention group (INT) (n = 64) or a standard care group (StC) (n = 34). All participants received standard care with blinded, target-driven medical therapy. INT included up to 5-6 weekly supervised aerobic and strength training sessions and dietary plans targeting a body mass index ≤ 25 kg/m². No intervention was given during the follow-up period. Forty-nine (77%) and 19 (56%) participants in INT and StC attended the 6-year follow-up. Based on the original intention-to-treat population, the primary outcome was the change in HbA1c from baseline to 6-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included weight, Low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, blood pressure (BP), and cardiorespiratory fitness.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nNinety-eight participants (mean age 54.6 years; 46% women; mean baseline Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c): 49.8 mmol/mol) were analyzed. HbA1c changed 6% and 13% in the INT and StC from baseline to 6-year follow-up (between group difference: -6% (95%CI: -14 to 3); p = 0.18). While no differences were observed for most secondary outcomes, the diastolic BP decreased 6.0 (95%CI: 2.1 to 9.8) mmHg more in the StC compared to INT.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nThe sustained effect of the lifestyle intervention on glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors was marginal, and it was surprisingly associated with inferior diastolic BP regulation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sport and Health Science\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"101059\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sport and Health Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101059\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport and Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101059","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Six-year follow-up of glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors after a one-year intensive lifestyle intervention in type 2 diabetes: An extension of the randomized U-TURN trial.
PURPOSE
This study aimed to describe the effects of a 1-year lifestyle intervention on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and cardiovascular risk factors 5 years after cessation of the lifestyle intervention in persons with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
METHODS
From April 2015 to August 2016, 98 persons with T2D (duration < 10 years) were randomly allocated (2:1, stratified by sex) to a 1-year lifestyle intervention group (INT) (n = 64) or a standard care group (StC) (n = 34). All participants received standard care with blinded, target-driven medical therapy. INT included up to 5-6 weekly supervised aerobic and strength training sessions and dietary plans targeting a body mass index ≤ 25 kg/m². No intervention was given during the follow-up period. Forty-nine (77%) and 19 (56%) participants in INT and StC attended the 6-year follow-up. Based on the original intention-to-treat population, the primary outcome was the change in HbA1c from baseline to 6-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included weight, Low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, blood pressure (BP), and cardiorespiratory fitness.
RESULTS
Ninety-eight participants (mean age 54.6 years; 46% women; mean baseline Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c): 49.8 mmol/mol) were analyzed. HbA1c changed 6% and 13% in the INT and StC from baseline to 6-year follow-up (between group difference: -6% (95%CI: -14 to 3); p = 0.18). While no differences were observed for most secondary outcomes, the diastolic BP decreased 6.0 (95%CI: 2.1 to 9.8) mmHg more in the StC compared to INT.
CONCLUSION
The sustained effect of the lifestyle intervention on glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors was marginal, and it was surprisingly associated with inferior diastolic BP regulation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sport and Health Science (JSHS) is an international, multidisciplinary journal that aims to advance the fields of sport, exercise, physical activity, and health sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Shanghai University of Sport, JSHS is dedicated to promoting original and impactful research, as well as topical reviews, editorials, opinions, and commentary papers.
With a focus on physical and mental health, injury and disease prevention, traditional Chinese exercise, and human performance, JSHS offers a platform for scholars and researchers to share their findings and contribute to the advancement of these fields. Our journal is peer-reviewed, ensuring that all published works meet the highest academic standards.
Supported by a carefully selected international editorial board, JSHS upholds impeccable integrity and provides an efficient publication platform. We invite submissions from scholars and researchers worldwide, and we are committed to disseminating insightful and influential research in the field of sport and health science.