2型糖尿病患者1年强化生活方式干预后6年血糖控制和心血管危险因素随访:随机u型大转弯试验的延伸

IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Mette Yun Johansen,Cody Garett Durrer,Nanna Skytt Pilmark,Grit Elster Legaard,Kristian Karstoft,Katrine Bagge Hansen,Christopher Scott MacDonald,Thomas Peter Almdal,Jakob Bue Bjorner,Nicolai J Wewer Albrechtsen,Allan Arthur Vaag,Robin Christensen,Bente Klarlund Pedersen,Mathias Ried-Larsen
{"title":"2型糖尿病患者1年强化生活方式干预后6年血糖控制和心血管危险因素随访:随机u型大转弯试验的延伸","authors":"Mette Yun Johansen,Cody Garett Durrer,Nanna Skytt Pilmark,Grit Elster Legaard,Kristian Karstoft,Katrine Bagge Hansen,Christopher Scott MacDonald,Thomas Peter Almdal,Jakob Bue Bjorner,Nicolai J Wewer Albrechtsen,Allan Arthur Vaag,Robin Christensen,Bente Klarlund Pedersen,Mathias Ried-Larsen","doi":"10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nThis study aimed to describe the effects of a 1-year lifestyle intervention on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and cardiovascular risk factors 5 years after cessation of the lifestyle intervention in persons with type 2 diabetes (T2D).\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nFrom April 2015 to August 2016, 98 persons with T2D (duration < 10 years) were randomly allocated (2:1, stratified by sex) to a 1-year lifestyle intervention group (INT) (n = 64) or a standard care group (StC) (n = 34). All participants received standard care with blinded, target-driven medical therapy. INT included up to 5-6 weekly supervised aerobic and strength training sessions and dietary plans targeting a body mass index ≤ 25 kg/m². No intervention was given during the follow-up period. Forty-nine (77%) and 19 (56%) participants in INT and StC attended the 6-year follow-up. Based on the original intention-to-treat population, the primary outcome was the change in HbA1c from baseline to 6-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included weight, Low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, blood pressure (BP), and cardiorespiratory fitness.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nNinety-eight participants (mean age 54.6 years; 46% women; mean baseline Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c): 49.8 mmol/mol) were analyzed. HbA1c changed 6% and 13% in the INT and StC from baseline to 6-year follow-up (between group difference: -6% (95%CI: -14 to 3); p = 0.18). While no differences were observed for most secondary outcomes, the diastolic BP decreased 6.0 (95%CI: 2.1 to 9.8) mmHg more in the StC compared to INT.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe sustained effect of the lifestyle intervention on glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors was marginal, and it was surprisingly associated with inferior diastolic BP regulation.","PeriodicalId":48897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport and Health Science","volume":"45 1","pages":"101059"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Six-year follow-up of glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors after a one-year intensive lifestyle intervention in type 2 diabetes: An extension of the randomized U-TURN trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mette Yun Johansen,Cody Garett Durrer,Nanna Skytt Pilmark,Grit Elster Legaard,Kristian Karstoft,Katrine Bagge Hansen,Christopher Scott MacDonald,Thomas Peter Almdal,Jakob Bue Bjorner,Nicolai J Wewer Albrechtsen,Allan Arthur Vaag,Robin Christensen,Bente Klarlund Pedersen,Mathias Ried-Larsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\r\\nThis study aimed to describe the effects of a 1-year lifestyle intervention on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and cardiovascular risk factors 5 years after cessation of the lifestyle intervention in persons with type 2 diabetes (T2D).\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nFrom April 2015 to August 2016, 98 persons with T2D (duration < 10 years) were randomly allocated (2:1, stratified by sex) to a 1-year lifestyle intervention group (INT) (n = 64) or a standard care group (StC) (n = 34). All participants received standard care with blinded, target-driven medical therapy. INT included up to 5-6 weekly supervised aerobic and strength training sessions and dietary plans targeting a body mass index ≤ 25 kg/m². No intervention was given during the follow-up period. Forty-nine (77%) and 19 (56%) participants in INT and StC attended the 6-year follow-up. Based on the original intention-to-treat population, the primary outcome was the change in HbA1c from baseline to 6-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included weight, Low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, blood pressure (BP), and cardiorespiratory fitness.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nNinety-eight participants (mean age 54.6 years; 46% women; mean baseline Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c): 49.8 mmol/mol) were analyzed. HbA1c changed 6% and 13% in the INT and StC from baseline to 6-year follow-up (between group difference: -6% (95%CI: -14 to 3); p = 0.18). While no differences were observed for most secondary outcomes, the diastolic BP decreased 6.0 (95%CI: 2.1 to 9.8) mmHg more in the StC compared to INT.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nThe sustained effect of the lifestyle intervention on glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors was marginal, and it was surprisingly associated with inferior diastolic BP regulation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sport and Health Science\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"101059\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sport and Health Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101059\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport and Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101059","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在描述1年生活方式干预对2型糖尿病(T2D)患者停止生活方式干预5年后血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)和心血管危险因素的影响。方法2015年4月至2016年8月,98例T2D患者(病程< 10年)随机(2:1,按性别分层)分为1年生活方式干预组(INT) (n = 64)和标准治疗组(StC) (n = 34)。所有参与者都接受了标准的盲法、靶标驱动的药物治疗。INT包括每周5-6次有监督的有氧和力量训练课程,以及针对体重指数≤25 kg/m²的饮食计划。随访期间未进行干预。49名(77%)INT和19名(56%)StC参与者参加了为期6年的随访。基于初始意向治疗人群,主要结局是HbA1c从基线到6年随访的变化。次要结局包括体重、低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇、血压(BP)和心肺健康。结果98例,平均年龄54.6岁;46%的女性;平均基线血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c): 49.8 mmol/mol。从基线到6年随访,INT和StC患者的HbA1c变化了6%和13%(组间差异:-6% (95%CI: -14至3); = 0.18页)。虽然在大多数次要结果中没有观察到差异,但与INT相比,StC组舒张压下降6.0 mmHg (95%CI: 2.1至9.8)。结论生活方式干预对血糖控制和心血管危险因素的持续影响是边际的,并且与舒张压调节有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Six-year follow-up of glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors after a one-year intensive lifestyle intervention in type 2 diabetes: An extension of the randomized U-TURN trial.
PURPOSE This study aimed to describe the effects of a 1-year lifestyle intervention on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and cardiovascular risk factors 5 years after cessation of the lifestyle intervention in persons with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS From April 2015 to August 2016, 98 persons with T2D (duration < 10 years) were randomly allocated (2:1, stratified by sex) to a 1-year lifestyle intervention group (INT) (n = 64) or a standard care group (StC) (n = 34). All participants received standard care with blinded, target-driven medical therapy. INT included up to 5-6 weekly supervised aerobic and strength training sessions and dietary plans targeting a body mass index ≤ 25 kg/m². No intervention was given during the follow-up period. Forty-nine (77%) and 19 (56%) participants in INT and StC attended the 6-year follow-up. Based on the original intention-to-treat population, the primary outcome was the change in HbA1c from baseline to 6-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included weight, Low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, blood pressure (BP), and cardiorespiratory fitness. RESULTS Ninety-eight participants (mean age 54.6 years; 46% women; mean baseline Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c): 49.8 mmol/mol) were analyzed. HbA1c changed 6% and 13% in the INT and StC from baseline to 6-year follow-up (between group difference: -6% (95%CI: -14 to 3); p = 0.18). While no differences were observed for most secondary outcomes, the diastolic BP decreased 6.0 (95%CI: 2.1 to 9.8) mmHg more in the StC compared to INT. CONCLUSION The sustained effect of the lifestyle intervention on glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors was marginal, and it was surprisingly associated with inferior diastolic BP regulation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.30
自引率
1.70%
发文量
101
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sport and Health Science (JSHS) is an international, multidisciplinary journal that aims to advance the fields of sport, exercise, physical activity, and health sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Shanghai University of Sport, JSHS is dedicated to promoting original and impactful research, as well as topical reviews, editorials, opinions, and commentary papers. With a focus on physical and mental health, injury and disease prevention, traditional Chinese exercise, and human performance, JSHS offers a platform for scholars and researchers to share their findings and contribute to the advancement of these fields. Our journal is peer-reviewed, ensuring that all published works meet the highest academic standards. Supported by a carefully selected international editorial board, JSHS upholds impeccable integrity and provides an efficient publication platform. We invite submissions from scholars and researchers worldwide, and we are committed to disseminating insightful and influential research in the field of sport and health science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信