Maya Rawal, Stephanie Galloway, Michelle E Florido, Amanda L Bergner, Ronald Wapner, Jill S Goldman
{"title":"成人发病神经退行性疾病的产前诊断检测。","authors":"Maya Rawal, Stephanie Galloway, Michelle E Florido, Amanda L Bergner, Ronald Wapner, Jill S Goldman","doi":"10.1002/pd.6826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated existing practices and institutional guidelines on prenatal diagnostic testing (PND) for adult-onset neurodegenerative disease (AOND) to identify points of consensus, disparities, and areas of need in healthcare settings across the United States (US) to better understand if national guidelines are needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire about institutional practices and guidelines on PND for AOND was distributed through the National Society of Genetic Counselors, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and Huntington's Disease Society of America Centers of Excellence. Of 104 responses, 50 met eligibility criteria and were analyzed for commonalities and shared themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of those who provided responses, 80% reported that their institution does not have a formal protocol or written guidelines on PND for AOND. Challenges to PND for AOND included ethical decision making after a positive genetic result, double disclosure of fetal and parental status, and differing values among relevant stakeholders. Of those who provided responses, 100% indicated that national guidelines would be beneficial.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study helps establish the need for national guidelines on PND for AOND given that most institutions surveyed do not have standardized protocols. Points of consensus and shared areas of uncertainty may serve as starting points for the formation of national practice guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Adult-Onset Neurodegenerative Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Maya Rawal, Stephanie Galloway, Michelle E Florido, Amanda L Bergner, Ronald Wapner, Jill S Goldman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pd.6826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated existing practices and institutional guidelines on prenatal diagnostic testing (PND) for adult-onset neurodegenerative disease (AOND) to identify points of consensus, disparities, and areas of need in healthcare settings across the United States (US) to better understand if national guidelines are needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire about institutional practices and guidelines on PND for AOND was distributed through the National Society of Genetic Counselors, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and Huntington's Disease Society of America Centers of Excellence. Of 104 responses, 50 met eligibility criteria and were analyzed for commonalities and shared themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of those who provided responses, 80% reported that their institution does not have a formal protocol or written guidelines on PND for AOND. Challenges to PND for AOND included ethical decision making after a positive genetic result, double disclosure of fetal and parental status, and differing values among relevant stakeholders. Of those who provided responses, 100% indicated that national guidelines would be beneficial.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study helps establish the need for national guidelines on PND for AOND given that most institutions surveyed do not have standardized protocols. Points of consensus and shared areas of uncertainty may serve as starting points for the formation of national practice guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prenatal Diagnosis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prenatal Diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6826\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6826","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Adult-Onset Neurodegenerative Disease.
Objective: This study investigated existing practices and institutional guidelines on prenatal diagnostic testing (PND) for adult-onset neurodegenerative disease (AOND) to identify points of consensus, disparities, and areas of need in healthcare settings across the United States (US) to better understand if national guidelines are needed.
Methods: A questionnaire about institutional practices and guidelines on PND for AOND was distributed through the National Society of Genetic Counselors, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and Huntington's Disease Society of America Centers of Excellence. Of 104 responses, 50 met eligibility criteria and were analyzed for commonalities and shared themes.
Results: Of those who provided responses, 80% reported that their institution does not have a formal protocol or written guidelines on PND for AOND. Challenges to PND for AOND included ethical decision making after a positive genetic result, double disclosure of fetal and parental status, and differing values among relevant stakeholders. Of those who provided responses, 100% indicated that national guidelines would be beneficial.
Conclusion: This study helps establish the need for national guidelines on PND for AOND given that most institutions surveyed do not have standardized protocols. Points of consensus and shared areas of uncertainty may serve as starting points for the formation of national practice guidelines.
期刊介绍:
Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling