Robert H. Eikelboom, Catherine M. Sucher, Sandra R. Bellekom, Marcus D. Atlas
{"title":"澳大利亚人工耳蜗植入:23年活动的回顾性分析。","authors":"Robert H. Eikelboom, Catherine M. Sucher, Sandra R. Bellekom, Marcus D. Atlas","doi":"10.1111/coa.14334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To report the number of cochlear implantation procedures and recipients in Australia since 2000 by age, and to estimate the adult uptake of cochlear implants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a retrospective analysis of data, using publicly available data on private and public hospital procedures undertaken in Australia between 2000/01 and 2022/23. The main outcome measures were: (i) Number of cochlear implants per financial year, by paediatric, adult, or 10-year age groups, and population adjusted. (ii) Adult uptake rate of cochlear implants, adjusted for explantation and replantation rates, and bilateral implantation rates. This study followed STROBE guidelines for reporting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>25 611 devices were implanted between July 2000 and June 2023, with annual numbers rising from 200 per year to over 1400 per year. Despite females having a 50% lower prevalence of hearing loss than males, approximately an equal number of males and females are implanted. Paediatric implantation has declined since 2016. The adult uptake rate of cochlear implants is estimated to be 10.5%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Despite the known economic and social benefits of cochlear implants, and the rising number of people with hearing loss, the initial increase in rates of implantation appeared to have slowed, and the uptake rate remains low. Public health and hospital policy should be directed to improving public education, awareness, and referral and assessment pathways, especially for males.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10431,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Otolaryngology","volume":"50 5","pages":"871-877"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/coa.14334","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cochlear Implantation in Australia: A Retrospective Analysis of 23 Years of Activity\",\"authors\":\"Robert H. Eikelboom, Catherine M. Sucher, Sandra R. Bellekom, Marcus D. Atlas\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/coa.14334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To report the number of cochlear implantation procedures and recipients in Australia since 2000 by age, and to estimate the adult uptake of cochlear implants.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This was a retrospective analysis of data, using publicly available data on private and public hospital procedures undertaken in Australia between 2000/01 and 2022/23. The main outcome measures were: (i) Number of cochlear implants per financial year, by paediatric, adult, or 10-year age groups, and population adjusted. (ii) Adult uptake rate of cochlear implants, adjusted for explantation and replantation rates, and bilateral implantation rates. This study followed STROBE guidelines for reporting.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>25 611 devices were implanted between July 2000 and June 2023, with annual numbers rising from 200 per year to over 1400 per year. Despite females having a 50% lower prevalence of hearing loss than males, approximately an equal number of males and females are implanted. Paediatric implantation has declined since 2016. The adult uptake rate of cochlear implants is estimated to be 10.5%.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Despite the known economic and social benefits of cochlear implants, and the rising number of people with hearing loss, the initial increase in rates of implantation appeared to have slowed, and the uptake rate remains low. Public health and hospital policy should be directed to improving public education, awareness, and referral and assessment pathways, especially for males.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"50 5\",\"pages\":\"871-877\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/coa.14334\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/coa.14334\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/coa.14334","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cochlear Implantation in Australia: A Retrospective Analysis of 23 Years of Activity
Objectives
To report the number of cochlear implantation procedures and recipients in Australia since 2000 by age, and to estimate the adult uptake of cochlear implants.
Methods
This was a retrospective analysis of data, using publicly available data on private and public hospital procedures undertaken in Australia between 2000/01 and 2022/23. The main outcome measures were: (i) Number of cochlear implants per financial year, by paediatric, adult, or 10-year age groups, and population adjusted. (ii) Adult uptake rate of cochlear implants, adjusted for explantation and replantation rates, and bilateral implantation rates. This study followed STROBE guidelines for reporting.
Results
25 611 devices were implanted between July 2000 and June 2023, with annual numbers rising from 200 per year to over 1400 per year. Despite females having a 50% lower prevalence of hearing loss than males, approximately an equal number of males and females are implanted. Paediatric implantation has declined since 2016. The adult uptake rate of cochlear implants is estimated to be 10.5%.
Conclusions
Despite the known economic and social benefits of cochlear implants, and the rising number of people with hearing loss, the initial increase in rates of implantation appeared to have slowed, and the uptake rate remains low. Public health and hospital policy should be directed to improving public education, awareness, and referral and assessment pathways, especially for males.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Otolaryngology is a bimonthly journal devoted to clinically-oriented research papers of the highest scientific standards dealing with:
current otorhinolaryngological practice
audiology, otology, balance, rhinology, larynx, voice and paediatric ORL
head and neck oncology
head and neck plastic and reconstructive surgery
continuing medical education and ORL training
The emphasis is on high quality new work in the clinical field and on fresh, original research.
Each issue begins with an editorial expressing the personal opinions of an individual with a particular knowledge of a chosen subject. The main body of each issue is then devoted to original papers carrying important results for those working in the field. In addition, topical review articles are published discussing a particular subject in depth, including not only the opinions of the author but also any controversies surrounding the subject.
• Negative/null results
In order for research to advance, negative results, which often make a valuable contribution to the field, should be published. However, articles containing negative or null results are frequently not considered for publication or rejected by journals. We welcome papers of this kind, where appropriate and valid power calculations are included that give confidence that a negative result can be relied upon.