水分损失率决定了枝条可燃性对水分状态的物种特异性敏感性。

IF 2.7 2区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Azaj Mahmud, Nursema Aktepe, Dylan W Schwilk
{"title":"水分损失率决定了枝条可燃性对水分状态的物种特异性敏感性。","authors":"Azaj Mahmud, Nursema Aktepe, Dylan W Schwilk","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.70052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Premise: </strong>The importance of live fuel moisture content (LFMC), a critical determinant of plant flammability, to crown-fire behavior is subject to debate; physiological mechanisms underlying LFMC dynamics need to be incorporated into fire behavior models to better understand wildfire and vegetation-fire feedback. Here we aimed to determine the relationships among water potential, LFMC, and flammability, and how ecophysiological traits related to LFMC dynamics influence the relationship between plant water status (measured as water potential and LFMC) and flammability across nine native shrubs in Texas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed ignitability and heat release on excised shoots across a wide range of water potential and measured leaf and shoot ecophysiological traits to answer two questions: (1) What are the relationships between water potential, LFMC, and flammability, and do they vary across species? (2) If the relationship between water status and flammability varies across species, which plant traits predict the strength of this relationship?</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LFMC covaried with water potential, but the shape of this relationship varied across species. The effect of water status on ignitability and heat release varied significantly across species, and the shoot moisture loss rate was lower in species in which ignitability and heat release was sensitive to water status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that the LFMC-flammability relationship across species depends on plant traits that influence water loss during fire weather conditions, and incorporating plant traits shaping LFMC dynamics into fire behavior models will improve our understanding of drought-vegetation-fire feedback.</p>","PeriodicalId":7691,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Botany","volume":" ","pages":"e70052"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moisture loss rate drives the species-specific sensitivity of shoot flammability to water status.\",\"authors\":\"Azaj Mahmud, Nursema Aktepe, Dylan W Schwilk\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajb2.70052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Premise: </strong>The importance of live fuel moisture content (LFMC), a critical determinant of plant flammability, to crown-fire behavior is subject to debate; physiological mechanisms underlying LFMC dynamics need to be incorporated into fire behavior models to better understand wildfire and vegetation-fire feedback. Here we aimed to determine the relationships among water potential, LFMC, and flammability, and how ecophysiological traits related to LFMC dynamics influence the relationship between plant water status (measured as water potential and LFMC) and flammability across nine native shrubs in Texas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed ignitability and heat release on excised shoots across a wide range of water potential and measured leaf and shoot ecophysiological traits to answer two questions: (1) What are the relationships between water potential, LFMC, and flammability, and do they vary across species? (2) If the relationship between water status and flammability varies across species, which plant traits predict the strength of this relationship?</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LFMC covaried with water potential, but the shape of this relationship varied across species. The effect of water status on ignitability and heat release varied significantly across species, and the shoot moisture loss rate was lower in species in which ignitability and heat release was sensitive to water status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that the LFMC-flammability relationship across species depends on plant traits that influence water loss during fire weather conditions, and incorporating plant traits shaping LFMC dynamics into fire behavior models will improve our understanding of drought-vegetation-fire feedback.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Botany\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70052\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Botany\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.70052\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.70052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前提:活燃料水分含量(LFMC)是植物可燃性的关键决定因素,对冠状火行为的重要性存在争议;LFMC动力学背后的生理机制需要纳入火灾行为模型,以更好地理解野火和植被-火灾反馈。在这里,我们旨在确定水势、LFMC和可燃性之间的关系,以及与LFMC动态相关的生态生理性状如何影响植物水分状态(以水势和LFMC测量)和可燃性之间的关系。方法:在不同水势条件下,通过测量叶片和茎部的生理生态性状,对不同水势、LFMC和可燃性之间的关系以及物种间的差异进行了评价。(2)如果水分状态和可燃性之间的关系在不同物种之间存在差异,那么哪些植物性状预测了这种关系的强度?结果:LFMC与水势共变,但这种关系的形态在不同物种间存在差异。水分状况对可燃性和放热的影响在不同物种间差异显著,对可燃性和放热敏感的物种的茎部水分损失率较低。结论:本研究表明,跨物种的LFMC-可燃性关系取决于影响火灾天气条件下水分损失的植物性状,将影响LFMC动态的植物性状纳入火灾行为模型将提高我们对干旱-植被-火灾反馈的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moisture loss rate drives the species-specific sensitivity of shoot flammability to water status.

Premise: The importance of live fuel moisture content (LFMC), a critical determinant of plant flammability, to crown-fire behavior is subject to debate; physiological mechanisms underlying LFMC dynamics need to be incorporated into fire behavior models to better understand wildfire and vegetation-fire feedback. Here we aimed to determine the relationships among water potential, LFMC, and flammability, and how ecophysiological traits related to LFMC dynamics influence the relationship between plant water status (measured as water potential and LFMC) and flammability across nine native shrubs in Texas.

Methods: We assessed ignitability and heat release on excised shoots across a wide range of water potential and measured leaf and shoot ecophysiological traits to answer two questions: (1) What are the relationships between water potential, LFMC, and flammability, and do they vary across species? (2) If the relationship between water status and flammability varies across species, which plant traits predict the strength of this relationship?

Results: LFMC covaried with water potential, but the shape of this relationship varied across species. The effect of water status on ignitability and heat release varied significantly across species, and the shoot moisture loss rate was lower in species in which ignitability and heat release was sensitive to water status.

Conclusions: This study suggests that the LFMC-flammability relationship across species depends on plant traits that influence water loss during fire weather conditions, and incorporating plant traits shaping LFMC dynamics into fire behavior models will improve our understanding of drought-vegetation-fire feedback.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Botany
American Journal of Botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
171
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Botany (AJB), the flagship journal of the Botanical Society of America (BSA), publishes peer-reviewed, innovative, significant research of interest to a wide audience of plant scientists in all areas of plant biology (structure, function, development, diversity, genetics, evolution, systematics), all levels of organization (molecular to ecosystem), and all plant groups and allied organisms (cyanobacteria, algae, fungi, and lichens). AJB requires authors to frame their research questions and discuss their results in terms of major questions of plant biology. In general, papers that are too narrowly focused, purely descriptive, natural history, broad surveys, or that contain only preliminary data will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信