Jennifer W. MacAdam, Juan J. Villalba, Sebastian Lagrange, Elizabeth K. Stewart, Lance R. Pitcher, Kathryn A. Slebodnik, Jeanette M. Norton, Jennifer R. Reeve, Yunhua Zhang, Andrea I. Bolletta, Jerrad F. Legako, Rachael G. Christensen, Sara R. Hunt
{"title":"美国西部山区生产的多年生不胀气的温带豆科植物和牧草功能饲料体内甲烷和尿氮的减少","authors":"Jennifer W. MacAdam, Juan J. Villalba, Sebastian Lagrange, Elizabeth K. Stewart, Lance R. Pitcher, Kathryn A. Slebodnik, Jeanette M. Norton, Jennifer R. Reeve, Yunhua Zhang, Andrea I. Bolletta, Jerrad F. Legako, Rachael G. Christensen, Sara R. Hunt","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ruminant livestock production is the greatest source of agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) production, largely due to enteric methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions. While the optimised feed rations used in confinement dairy and beef finishing operations can reduce CH<sub>4</sub> emissions of individual animals compared with cattle on forage diets, the profitability of beef cowherds and grazing-based dairies rests on controlling the input costs, most notably feed. Grazing is the least costly feed source, and we have studied the management of non-bloating, nutrient-dense perennial forages with the goal of maximising benefits to ruminants, the environment, producers, and consumers. The naturally alkaline soils, dry climate, long sunny days, and cool nights of the Mountain West United States are favourable for the productivity and persistence of perennial legumes. While alfalfa (<i>Medicago sativa</i> L.) is the highest-value cash crop in the western United States, it is not routinely used for grazing due to the likelihood of bloat. Relative to cattle grazing cool-season grass pastures, cattle grazing sainfoin (<i>Onobrychis viciifolia</i> Scop.), birdsfoot trefoil (<i>Lotus corniculatus</i> L.), and cicer milkvetch (<i>Astragalus cicer</i> L.) had greater intake, production, and lower urinary nitrogen. As a function of intake, the enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions of cows, heifers, and calves grazing these legume pastures were reduced 25%–63% compared with the same cattle on grass pastures, and heifers grazing legume pastures had CH<sub>4</sub> emissions no different from heifers on total mixed rations. We integrate these observations of temperate perennial forage legumes and forbs with the wider literature to identify promising traits and species.</p>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":"80 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gfs.12719","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Vivo Reductions in Methane and Urinary Nitrogen by Perennial Non-Bloating Temperate Legume and Forb Functional Forages Produced in the Mountain West United States\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer W. MacAdam, Juan J. Villalba, Sebastian Lagrange, Elizabeth K. Stewart, Lance R. Pitcher, Kathryn A. Slebodnik, Jeanette M. Norton, Jennifer R. Reeve, Yunhua Zhang, Andrea I. Bolletta, Jerrad F. Legako, Rachael G. Christensen, Sara R. Hunt\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gfs.12719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Ruminant livestock production is the greatest source of agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) production, largely due to enteric methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions. While the optimised feed rations used in confinement dairy and beef finishing operations can reduce CH<sub>4</sub> emissions of individual animals compared with cattle on forage diets, the profitability of beef cowherds and grazing-based dairies rests on controlling the input costs, most notably feed. Grazing is the least costly feed source, and we have studied the management of non-bloating, nutrient-dense perennial forages with the goal of maximising benefits to ruminants, the environment, producers, and consumers. The naturally alkaline soils, dry climate, long sunny days, and cool nights of the Mountain West United States are favourable for the productivity and persistence of perennial legumes. While alfalfa (<i>Medicago sativa</i> L.) is the highest-value cash crop in the western United States, it is not routinely used for grazing due to the likelihood of bloat. Relative to cattle grazing cool-season grass pastures, cattle grazing sainfoin (<i>Onobrychis viciifolia</i> Scop.), birdsfoot trefoil (<i>Lotus corniculatus</i> L.), and cicer milkvetch (<i>Astragalus cicer</i> L.) had greater intake, production, and lower urinary nitrogen. As a function of intake, the enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions of cows, heifers, and calves grazing these legume pastures were reduced 25%–63% compared with the same cattle on grass pastures, and heifers grazing legume pastures had CH<sub>4</sub> emissions no different from heifers on total mixed rations. We integrate these observations of temperate perennial forage legumes and forbs with the wider literature to identify promising traits and species.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Grass and Forage Science\",\"volume\":\"80 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gfs.12719\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Grass and Forage Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12719\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12719","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
In Vivo Reductions in Methane and Urinary Nitrogen by Perennial Non-Bloating Temperate Legume and Forb Functional Forages Produced in the Mountain West United States
Ruminant livestock production is the greatest source of agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) production, largely due to enteric methane (CH4) emissions. While the optimised feed rations used in confinement dairy and beef finishing operations can reduce CH4 emissions of individual animals compared with cattle on forage diets, the profitability of beef cowherds and grazing-based dairies rests on controlling the input costs, most notably feed. Grazing is the least costly feed source, and we have studied the management of non-bloating, nutrient-dense perennial forages with the goal of maximising benefits to ruminants, the environment, producers, and consumers. The naturally alkaline soils, dry climate, long sunny days, and cool nights of the Mountain West United States are favourable for the productivity and persistence of perennial legumes. While alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is the highest-value cash crop in the western United States, it is not routinely used for grazing due to the likelihood of bloat. Relative to cattle grazing cool-season grass pastures, cattle grazing sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.), birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.), and cicer milkvetch (Astragalus cicer L.) had greater intake, production, and lower urinary nitrogen. As a function of intake, the enteric CH4 emissions of cows, heifers, and calves grazing these legume pastures were reduced 25%–63% compared with the same cattle on grass pastures, and heifers grazing legume pastures had CH4 emissions no different from heifers on total mixed rations. We integrate these observations of temperate perennial forage legumes and forbs with the wider literature to identify promising traits and species.
期刊介绍:
Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.