人工智能和手部卫生准确性:牙科诊所感染控制的新时代

IF 2.2 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Salwa A. Aldahlawi, Amr H. Almoallim, Ibtesam K. Afifi
{"title":"人工智能和手部卫生准确性:牙科诊所感染控制的新时代","authors":"Salwa A. Aldahlawi,&nbsp;Amr H. Almoallim,&nbsp;Ibtesam K. Afifi","doi":"10.1002/cre2.70150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The study aimed to assess the efficacy of an artificial intelligence (AI) model in evaluating hand hygiene (HH) performance compared to infection control auditors in dental clinics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Method</h3>\n \n <p>The AI model utilized a pretrained convolutional neural network (CNN) and was fine-tuned on a custom data set of videos showing dental students performing alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) procedures. A total of 66 videos were recorded, with 33 used for training and 11 for validating the model. The remaining 22 videos were designated for testing and the AI- infection control auditors comparison experiment. Two infection control auditors assessed the HH performance videos using a standardized checklist. The model's performance was evaluated through precision, recall, and F1 score across various classes. The level of agreement between the auditors and the AI assessments was measured using Cohen's kappa, and the sensitivity and specificity of the AI were compared to those of the infection control auditors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The AI model has learned to differentiate between classes of hand movement, with an overall F1 score of 0.85. Results showed a 90.91% agreement rate between the AI model and infection control auditors in evaluating HH steps, with a sensitivity of 85.7% and specificity of 100% in identifying acceptable HH practices. Step 3 (back of fingers to opposing palm with fingers interlocked) was consistently identified as the most frequently missed step by both the AI model and the infection control auditors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The AI model assessment of HH performance closely matched auditors' evaluations, suggesting its reliability as a tool for evaluating and mentoring HH in dental clinics. Future research should explore the application of AI technology in different dental settings to further validate its feasibility and adaptability.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10203,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cre2.70150","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence and Hand Hygiene Accuracy: A New Era in Infection Control for Dental Practices\",\"authors\":\"Salwa A. Aldahlawi,&nbsp;Amr H. Almoallim,&nbsp;Ibtesam K. Afifi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cre2.70150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study aimed to assess the efficacy of an artificial intelligence (AI) model in evaluating hand hygiene (HH) performance compared to infection control auditors in dental clinics.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Material and Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>The AI model utilized a pretrained convolutional neural network (CNN) and was fine-tuned on a custom data set of videos showing dental students performing alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) procedures. A total of 66 videos were recorded, with 33 used for training and 11 for validating the model. The remaining 22 videos were designated for testing and the AI- infection control auditors comparison experiment. Two infection control auditors assessed the HH performance videos using a standardized checklist. The model's performance was evaluated through precision, recall, and F1 score across various classes. The level of agreement between the auditors and the AI assessments was measured using Cohen's kappa, and the sensitivity and specificity of the AI were compared to those of the infection control auditors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The AI model has learned to differentiate between classes of hand movement, with an overall F1 score of 0.85. Results showed a 90.91% agreement rate between the AI model and infection control auditors in evaluating HH steps, with a sensitivity of 85.7% and specificity of 100% in identifying acceptable HH practices. Step 3 (back of fingers to opposing palm with fingers interlocked) was consistently identified as the most frequently missed step by both the AI model and the infection control auditors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The AI model assessment of HH performance closely matched auditors' evaluations, suggesting its reliability as a tool for evaluating and mentoring HH in dental clinics. Future research should explore the application of AI technology in different dental settings to further validate its feasibility and adaptability.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cre2.70150\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cre2.70150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cre2.70150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在评估人工智能(AI)模型在评估口腔诊所手卫生(HH)绩效方面的效果,并与感染控制审计员进行比较。人工智能模型利用预训练的卷积神经网络(CNN),并在一组定制数据集的视频上进行微调,这些视频显示牙科学生正在进行基于酒精的手部摩擦(ABHR)手术。总共录制了66个视频,其中33个用于训练,11个用于验证模型。剩下的22个视频被指定用于测试和人工智能感染控制审计员的比较实验。两名感染控制审核员使用标准化检查表评估了HH的表现视频。模型的性能通过准确率、召回率和不同类别的F1分数来评估。使用Cohen's kappa测量审核员与AI评估之间的一致程度,并将AI的敏感性和特异性与感染控制审核员的敏感性和特异性进行比较。结果人工智能模型已经学会了区分手部运动的类别,F1总分为0.85。结果显示,AI模型与感染控制审核员在评估HH步骤方面的一致性为90.91%,在识别可接受的HH实践方面的敏感性为85.7%,特异性为100%。人工智能模型和感染控制审计员一致认为,步骤3(手指背朝相对手掌,手指交叉)是最常被遗漏的步骤。结论人工智能模型对牙医绩效的评估与审核员的评估非常吻合,表明其作为评估和指导牙科诊所牙医的工具是可靠的。未来的研究应探索人工智能技术在不同牙科环境中的应用,进一步验证其可行性和适应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Artificial Intelligence and Hand Hygiene Accuracy: A New Era in Infection Control for Dental Practices

Artificial Intelligence and Hand Hygiene Accuracy: A New Era in Infection Control for Dental Practices

Objective

The study aimed to assess the efficacy of an artificial intelligence (AI) model in evaluating hand hygiene (HH) performance compared to infection control auditors in dental clinics.

Material and Method

The AI model utilized a pretrained convolutional neural network (CNN) and was fine-tuned on a custom data set of videos showing dental students performing alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) procedures. A total of 66 videos were recorded, with 33 used for training and 11 for validating the model. The remaining 22 videos were designated for testing and the AI- infection control auditors comparison experiment. Two infection control auditors assessed the HH performance videos using a standardized checklist. The model's performance was evaluated through precision, recall, and F1 score across various classes. The level of agreement between the auditors and the AI assessments was measured using Cohen's kappa, and the sensitivity and specificity of the AI were compared to those of the infection control auditors.

Results

The AI model has learned to differentiate between classes of hand movement, with an overall F1 score of 0.85. Results showed a 90.91% agreement rate between the AI model and infection control auditors in evaluating HH steps, with a sensitivity of 85.7% and specificity of 100% in identifying acceptable HH practices. Step 3 (back of fingers to opposing palm with fingers interlocked) was consistently identified as the most frequently missed step by both the AI model and the infection control auditors.

Conclusion

The AI model assessment of HH performance closely matched auditors' evaluations, suggesting its reliability as a tool for evaluating and mentoring HH in dental clinics. Future research should explore the application of AI technology in different dental settings to further validate its feasibility and adaptability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
165
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Dental Research aims to provide open access peer-reviewed publications of high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work within all disciplines and fields of oral medicine and dentistry. The scope of Clinical and Experimental Dental Research comprises original research material on the anatomy, physiology and pathology of oro-facial, oro-pharyngeal and maxillofacial tissues, and functions and dysfunctions within the stomatognathic system, and the epidemiology, aetiology, prevention, diagnosis, prognosis and therapy of diseases and conditions that have an effect on the homeostasis of the mouth, jaws, and closely associated structures, as well as the healing and regeneration and the clinical aspects of replacement of hard and soft tissues with biomaterials, and the rehabilitation of stomatognathic functions. Studies that bring new knowledge on how to advance health on the individual or public health levels, including interactions between oral and general health and ill-health are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信