{"title":"精英运动损伤相关急性疼痛:运动员疼痛管理策略模型","authors":"Anne-Claire Macquet, Marion Trousselard","doi":"10.1002/hfm.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Acute pain from injury is a major concern in sport and public health. Athletes are known to have higher pain tolerance than the general population, suggesting that they may manage pain differently. This study aims to elicit the “how” and “why” of acute pain management strategies when coping with sport injuries. A thematic analysis of qualitative data involved 12 injured elite athletes (EAs) to ascertain their drug and nondrug acute pain management strategies. Results showed 14 strategies relating to two functions: problem-focused and emotion-focused. Six problem-focused strategies aimed to change the relationship between an individual and his/her environment: (a) modulating activity; (b) seeking instrumental support; (c) goal setting; (d) encouraging oneself; (e) taking painkillers; and (f) reframing the perception of pain. Eight emotion-focused strategies aimed to manage emotional distress: (a) diverting attention; (b) acceptance; (c) relativising pain; (d) repeating negative thoughts; (e) ignoring pain; (f) seeking emotional support; (g) hoping and praying; and (h) self-blame. EAs were shown to favor three strategies: modulating activity, diverting attention, and seeking instrumental support. Results showed a repertoire of acute pain management strategies and the function each strategy served. The variety of pain management strategies reinforces the coping functions (Lazarus and Folkman 1984) and suggests newly-identified flexibility in coping with acute pain extending beyond previous results on chronic pain. Results enriched the pain management approach concerning nondrug-strategies for patients in acute pain. They could offer new perspectives on human factors in health to improve acute pain management in the general population.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55048,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries","volume":"35 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Injury-Related Acute Pain in Elite Sport: A Model of Athletes' Pain Management Strategies\",\"authors\":\"Anne-Claire Macquet, Marion Trousselard\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hfm.70013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Acute pain from injury is a major concern in sport and public health. Athletes are known to have higher pain tolerance than the general population, suggesting that they may manage pain differently. This study aims to elicit the “how” and “why” of acute pain management strategies when coping with sport injuries. A thematic analysis of qualitative data involved 12 injured elite athletes (EAs) to ascertain their drug and nondrug acute pain management strategies. Results showed 14 strategies relating to two functions: problem-focused and emotion-focused. Six problem-focused strategies aimed to change the relationship between an individual and his/her environment: (a) modulating activity; (b) seeking instrumental support; (c) goal setting; (d) encouraging oneself; (e) taking painkillers; and (f) reframing the perception of pain. Eight emotion-focused strategies aimed to manage emotional distress: (a) diverting attention; (b) acceptance; (c) relativising pain; (d) repeating negative thoughts; (e) ignoring pain; (f) seeking emotional support; (g) hoping and praying; and (h) self-blame. EAs were shown to favor three strategies: modulating activity, diverting attention, and seeking instrumental support. Results showed a repertoire of acute pain management strategies and the function each strategy served. The variety of pain management strategies reinforces the coping functions (Lazarus and Folkman 1984) and suggests newly-identified flexibility in coping with acute pain extending beyond previous results on chronic pain. Results enriched the pain management approach concerning nondrug-strategies for patients in acute pain. They could offer new perspectives on human factors in health to improve acute pain management in the general population.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hfm.70013\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hfm.70013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Injury-Related Acute Pain in Elite Sport: A Model of Athletes' Pain Management Strategies
Acute pain from injury is a major concern in sport and public health. Athletes are known to have higher pain tolerance than the general population, suggesting that they may manage pain differently. This study aims to elicit the “how” and “why” of acute pain management strategies when coping with sport injuries. A thematic analysis of qualitative data involved 12 injured elite athletes (EAs) to ascertain their drug and nondrug acute pain management strategies. Results showed 14 strategies relating to two functions: problem-focused and emotion-focused. Six problem-focused strategies aimed to change the relationship between an individual and his/her environment: (a) modulating activity; (b) seeking instrumental support; (c) goal setting; (d) encouraging oneself; (e) taking painkillers; and (f) reframing the perception of pain. Eight emotion-focused strategies aimed to manage emotional distress: (a) diverting attention; (b) acceptance; (c) relativising pain; (d) repeating negative thoughts; (e) ignoring pain; (f) seeking emotional support; (g) hoping and praying; and (h) self-blame. EAs were shown to favor three strategies: modulating activity, diverting attention, and seeking instrumental support. Results showed a repertoire of acute pain management strategies and the function each strategy served. The variety of pain management strategies reinforces the coping functions (Lazarus and Folkman 1984) and suggests newly-identified flexibility in coping with acute pain extending beyond previous results on chronic pain. Results enriched the pain management approach concerning nondrug-strategies for patients in acute pain. They could offer new perspectives on human factors in health to improve acute pain management in the general population.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries is to facilitate discovery, integration, and application of scientific knowledge about human aspects of manufacturing, and to provide a forum for worldwide dissemination of such knowledge for its application and benefit to manufacturing industries. The journal covers a broad spectrum of ergonomics and human factors issues with a focus on the design, operation and management of contemporary manufacturing systems, both in the shop floor and office environments, in the quest for manufacturing agility, i.e. enhancement and integration of human skills with hardware performance for improved market competitiveness, management of change, product and process quality, and human-system reliability. The inter- and cross-disciplinary nature of the journal allows for a wide scope of issues relevant to manufacturing system design and engineering, human resource management, social, organizational, safety, and health issues. Examples of specific subject areas of interest include: implementation of advanced manufacturing technology, human aspects of computer-aided design and engineering, work design, compensation and appraisal, selection training and education, labor-management relations, agile manufacturing and virtual companies, human factors in total quality management, prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, ergonomics of workplace, equipment and tool design, ergonomics programs, guides and standards for industry, automation safety and robot systems, human skills development and knowledge enhancing technologies, reliability, and safety and worker health issues.