葡萄牙水务部门动态绩效评估的多时期,多标准模型

IF 4.4 3区 经济学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Sandra Tralhão, Rita Martins, João Paulo Costa
{"title":"葡萄牙水务部门动态绩效评估的多时期,多标准模型","authors":"Sandra Tralhão,&nbsp;Rita Martins,&nbsp;João Paulo Costa","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We develop and apply a multi-period overall performance evaluation model, supported by multi-criteria decision aid methods, to assess the dynamic performance of Portuguese water service providers. Data from 2018 to 2021 provided by the regulation authority were used, and a preference elicitation procedure was applied to a pool of experts to determine the scale coefficients associated with the importance of the criteria and with each period under analysis. The results reveal peculiarities that would not be visible using a single-period evaluation process or a criterion-by-criterion evaluation model. For example, we identify service providers with unsatisfactory performance in areas critical to achieving the sector's strategic goals. We highlight the trend of stagnating performance in most indicators, even those that have shown unsatisfactory performance over the years, as is the case with the non-revenue water and major rehabilitation indicators. After applying the model, we can conclude that none of the water utilities is rated as providing “good quality service\".</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 101973"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multi-period, multi-criteria model for dynamic performance assessment of the Portuguese water sector\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Tralhão,&nbsp;Rita Martins,&nbsp;João Paulo Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We develop and apply a multi-period overall performance evaluation model, supported by multi-criteria decision aid methods, to assess the dynamic performance of Portuguese water service providers. Data from 2018 to 2021 provided by the regulation authority were used, and a preference elicitation procedure was applied to a pool of experts to determine the scale coefficients associated with the importance of the criteria and with each period under analysis. The results reveal peculiarities that would not be visible using a single-period evaluation process or a criterion-by-criterion evaluation model. For example, we identify service providers with unsatisfactory performance in areas critical to achieving the sector's strategic goals. We highlight the trend of stagnating performance in most indicators, even those that have shown unsatisfactory performance over the years, as is the case with the non-revenue water and major rehabilitation indicators. After applying the model, we can conclude that none of the water utilities is rated as providing “good quality service\\\".</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101973\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725000888\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725000888","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们开发并应用了一个多时期的整体绩效评估模型,由多标准决策辅助方法支持,以评估葡萄牙供水服务提供商的动态绩效。使用监管机构提供的2018年至2021年的数据,并对一群专家应用偏好激发程序,以确定与标准重要性和所分析的每个时期相关的规模系数。结果揭示了使用单周期评估过程或逐个标准评估模型不可见的特性。例如,我们确定在实现行业战略目标的关键领域表现不理想的服务提供商。我们强调,大多数指标的业绩停滞不前的趋势,即使是那些多年来表现不令人满意的指标,如非收入水和主要恢复指标的情况。应用模型后,我们可以得出结论,没有一家水务公司被评为提供“优质服务”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A multi-period, multi-criteria model for dynamic performance assessment of the Portuguese water sector
We develop and apply a multi-period overall performance evaluation model, supported by multi-criteria decision aid methods, to assess the dynamic performance of Portuguese water service providers. Data from 2018 to 2021 provided by the regulation authority were used, and a preference elicitation procedure was applied to a pool of experts to determine the scale coefficients associated with the importance of the criteria and with each period under analysis. The results reveal peculiarities that would not be visible using a single-period evaluation process or a criterion-by-criterion evaluation model. For example, we identify service providers with unsatisfactory performance in areas critical to achieving the sector's strategic goals. We highlight the trend of stagnating performance in most indicators, even those that have shown unsatisfactory performance over the years, as is the case with the non-revenue water and major rehabilitation indicators. After applying the model, we can conclude that none of the water utilities is rated as providing “good quality service".
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Utilities Policy
Utilities Policy ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services. Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信