Mojtaba Moosapoor , Bjarni Bessason , Birgir Hrafnkelsson , Rajesh Rupakhety , Jón Örvar Bjarnason , Sigurður Erlingsson
{"title":"南冰岛非结构构件的地震易损性:贝叶斯分层方法","authors":"Mojtaba Moosapoor , Bjarni Bessason , Birgir Hrafnkelsson , Rajesh Rupakhety , Jón Örvar Bjarnason , Sigurður Erlingsson","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study assesses the seismic fragility of residential buildings in Iceland, examining both structural and non-structural damage resulting from the earthquakes of 2000 and 2008. Leveraging detailed loss datasets from these events, we apply a Bayesian Hierarchical Fragility Framework with a separate Bernoulli approach to derive empirical fragility functions for multiple damage states. This method integrates a spatially correlated latent intensity measure field inferred from ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs), explicitly capturing both the spatial correlation and inherent uncertainty of GMPEs using Markov-Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling. By simultaneously modeling all damage states within a unified framework, while assigning distinct fragility parameters to each state, this approach leverages damage observations from all states to infer the latent IM field. This joint inference captures both the variability in the experienced IM at each building and the uncertainty in how that IM translates into observed damage responses. This research marks the first effort to specifically quantify the seismic fragility of non-structural damage in Icelandic buildings. Non-structural elements, which represent a significant proportion of total construction costs, contribute extensively to losses in global seismic events, often occurring even at low levels of ground shaking. The results underscore that non-structural components like interior fixtures and flooring are particularly vulnerable, more so than structural elements. Despite improvements in seismic codes, this study reveals a persistent vulnerability, underscoring the urgent need for targeted design and construction strategies that enhance the resilience of non-structural elements to ensure better overall building seismic functionality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"338 ","pages":"Article 120504"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Damage-informed seismic fragility of non-structural elements in South Iceland: A Bayesian hierarchical approach\",\"authors\":\"Mojtaba Moosapoor , Bjarni Bessason , Birgir Hrafnkelsson , Rajesh Rupakhety , Jón Örvar Bjarnason , Sigurður Erlingsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study assesses the seismic fragility of residential buildings in Iceland, examining both structural and non-structural damage resulting from the earthquakes of 2000 and 2008. Leveraging detailed loss datasets from these events, we apply a Bayesian Hierarchical Fragility Framework with a separate Bernoulli approach to derive empirical fragility functions for multiple damage states. This method integrates a spatially correlated latent intensity measure field inferred from ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs), explicitly capturing both the spatial correlation and inherent uncertainty of GMPEs using Markov-Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling. By simultaneously modeling all damage states within a unified framework, while assigning distinct fragility parameters to each state, this approach leverages damage observations from all states to infer the latent IM field. This joint inference captures both the variability in the experienced IM at each building and the uncertainty in how that IM translates into observed damage responses. This research marks the first effort to specifically quantify the seismic fragility of non-structural damage in Icelandic buildings. Non-structural elements, which represent a significant proportion of total construction costs, contribute extensively to losses in global seismic events, often occurring even at low levels of ground shaking. The results underscore that non-structural components like interior fixtures and flooring are particularly vulnerable, more so than structural elements. Despite improvements in seismic codes, this study reveals a persistent vulnerability, underscoring the urgent need for targeted design and construction strategies that enhance the resilience of non-structural elements to ensure better overall building seismic functionality.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"volume\":\"338 \",\"pages\":\"Article 120504\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625008958\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625008958","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Damage-informed seismic fragility of non-structural elements in South Iceland: A Bayesian hierarchical approach
This study assesses the seismic fragility of residential buildings in Iceland, examining both structural and non-structural damage resulting from the earthquakes of 2000 and 2008. Leveraging detailed loss datasets from these events, we apply a Bayesian Hierarchical Fragility Framework with a separate Bernoulli approach to derive empirical fragility functions for multiple damage states. This method integrates a spatially correlated latent intensity measure field inferred from ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs), explicitly capturing both the spatial correlation and inherent uncertainty of GMPEs using Markov-Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling. By simultaneously modeling all damage states within a unified framework, while assigning distinct fragility parameters to each state, this approach leverages damage observations from all states to infer the latent IM field. This joint inference captures both the variability in the experienced IM at each building and the uncertainty in how that IM translates into observed damage responses. This research marks the first effort to specifically quantify the seismic fragility of non-structural damage in Icelandic buildings. Non-structural elements, which represent a significant proportion of total construction costs, contribute extensively to losses in global seismic events, often occurring even at low levels of ground shaking. The results underscore that non-structural components like interior fixtures and flooring are particularly vulnerable, more so than structural elements. Despite improvements in seismic codes, this study reveals a persistent vulnerability, underscoring the urgent need for targeted design and construction strategies that enhance the resilience of non-structural elements to ensure better overall building seismic functionality.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.