{"title":"通过灵活性进行福利再分配——谁买单?","authors":"Polina Emelianova , Nils Namockel","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The increasing adoption of electricity-driven technologies, such as electric vehicles and heat pumps, is a key driver of the energy transition. If operated flexibly, these assets can influence electricity price formation and trigger a redistribution of welfare from producers to consumers. The magnitude and direction of this redistribution are likely to vary across technologies and end-user groups, depending on their flexibility potential and usage behavior. To explore these dynamics, this study quantifies redistributional effects by integrating diverse flexibility options and user groups into a high-resolution European dispatch model, simulating multiple flexibility use cases across the transport and heating sectors in Germany. Our findings show that while total system welfare increases slightly, greater flexibility leads to a significant redistribution of welfare from producers to consumers. Notably, consumers benefit as an aggregated group, regardless of whether they provide flexibility. Among the assessed flexibility options, electric vehicles – particularly through bidirectional charging – offer greater welfare gains compared to heat pumps, while also intensifying competition with utility-scale batteries. In the transport sector, flexibility leads to notable variations in electricity costs depending on charging behaviors, whereas in the heating sector, increased flexibility promotes cost convergence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"205 ","pages":"Article 114684"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Welfare redistribution through flexibility – Who pays?\",\"authors\":\"Polina Emelianova , Nils Namockel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The increasing adoption of electricity-driven technologies, such as electric vehicles and heat pumps, is a key driver of the energy transition. If operated flexibly, these assets can influence electricity price formation and trigger a redistribution of welfare from producers to consumers. The magnitude and direction of this redistribution are likely to vary across technologies and end-user groups, depending on their flexibility potential and usage behavior. To explore these dynamics, this study quantifies redistributional effects by integrating diverse flexibility options and user groups into a high-resolution European dispatch model, simulating multiple flexibility use cases across the transport and heating sectors in Germany. Our findings show that while total system welfare increases slightly, greater flexibility leads to a significant redistribution of welfare from producers to consumers. Notably, consumers benefit as an aggregated group, regardless of whether they provide flexibility. Among the assessed flexibility options, electric vehicles – particularly through bidirectional charging – offer greater welfare gains compared to heat pumps, while also intensifying competition with utility-scale batteries. In the transport sector, flexibility leads to notable variations in electricity costs depending on charging behaviors, whereas in the heating sector, increased flexibility promotes cost convergence.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Policy\",\"volume\":\"205 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114684\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525001910\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525001910","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Welfare redistribution through flexibility – Who pays?
The increasing adoption of electricity-driven technologies, such as electric vehicles and heat pumps, is a key driver of the energy transition. If operated flexibly, these assets can influence electricity price formation and trigger a redistribution of welfare from producers to consumers. The magnitude and direction of this redistribution are likely to vary across technologies and end-user groups, depending on their flexibility potential and usage behavior. To explore these dynamics, this study quantifies redistributional effects by integrating diverse flexibility options and user groups into a high-resolution European dispatch model, simulating multiple flexibility use cases across the transport and heating sectors in Germany. Our findings show that while total system welfare increases slightly, greater flexibility leads to a significant redistribution of welfare from producers to consumers. Notably, consumers benefit as an aggregated group, regardless of whether they provide flexibility. Among the assessed flexibility options, electric vehicles – particularly through bidirectional charging – offer greater welfare gains compared to heat pumps, while also intensifying competition with utility-scale batteries. In the transport sector, flexibility leads to notable variations in electricity costs depending on charging behaviors, whereas in the heating sector, increased flexibility promotes cost convergence.
期刊介绍:
Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques.
Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.