接近还是回避?感知AI可解释性与员工工作制作之间的关系

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Weiwei Huo , Jiaying Xie , Jiaqi Yan , Tianyi Long , Bingqian Liang
{"title":"接近还是回避?感知AI可解释性与员工工作制作之间的关系","authors":"Weiwei Huo ,&nbsp;Jiaying Xie ,&nbsp;Jiaqi Yan ,&nbsp;Tianyi Long ,&nbsp;Bingqian Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Amid growing concerns about the lack of transparency in algorithms, heightened focus has been placed on artificial intelligence (AI) explainability in workplace decision-making processes. This study leverages work design theory to explore when and how perceived AI explainability impacts two types of employee job crafting: approach job crafting and avoidance job crafting. We analysed multi-wave survey data of 278 medical staff to examine the effects of perceived AI explainability on approach and avoidance job crafting through a dual-pathway model. Results indicated that perceived AI explainability enhanced AI-oriented benefit perception and reduced AI-oriented threat perception, resulting in an increase in approach and avoidance job crafting. Furthermore, our findings suggested that ethical climate strengthened the impacts of perceived AI explainability on AI-oriented benefit perception and AI-oriented threat perception. We discuss key theoretical insights of our findings for advancing AI and job crafting research as well as implications for organisational practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 105097"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approach or avoidance? Relationship between perceived AI explainability and employee job crafting\",\"authors\":\"Weiwei Huo ,&nbsp;Jiaying Xie ,&nbsp;Jiaqi Yan ,&nbsp;Tianyi Long ,&nbsp;Bingqian Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Amid growing concerns about the lack of transparency in algorithms, heightened focus has been placed on artificial intelligence (AI) explainability in workplace decision-making processes. This study leverages work design theory to explore when and how perceived AI explainability impacts two types of employee job crafting: approach job crafting and avoidance job crafting. We analysed multi-wave survey data of 278 medical staff to examine the effects of perceived AI explainability on approach and avoidance job crafting through a dual-pathway model. Results indicated that perceived AI explainability enhanced AI-oriented benefit perception and reduced AI-oriented threat perception, resulting in an increase in approach and avoidance job crafting. Furthermore, our findings suggested that ethical climate strengthened the impacts of perceived AI explainability on AI-oriented benefit perception and AI-oriented threat perception. We discuss key theoretical insights of our findings for advancing AI and job crafting research as well as implications for organisational practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Psychologica\",\"volume\":\"257 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105097\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Psychologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000169182500410X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000169182500410X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在对算法缺乏透明度的担忧日益加剧之际,人们更加关注人工智能(AI)在工作场所决策过程中的可解释性。本研究利用工作设计理论来探索感知人工智能的可解释性何时以及如何影响两种类型的员工工作制作:接近工作制作和回避工作制作。我们分析了278名医务人员的多波调查数据,通过双途径模型研究了感知人工智能可解释性对接近和回避工作制作的影响。结果表明,感知到的人工智能可解释性增强了以人工智能为导向的利益感知,降低了以人工智能为导向的威胁感知,导致接近和回避工作制作的增加。此外,我们的研究结果表明,伦理气候增强了人工智能可解释性感知对人工智能导向的利益感知和人工智能导向的威胁感知的影响。我们讨论了研究结果的关键理论见解,以推进人工智能和工作制定研究,以及对组织实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Approach or avoidance? Relationship between perceived AI explainability and employee job crafting
Amid growing concerns about the lack of transparency in algorithms, heightened focus has been placed on artificial intelligence (AI) explainability in workplace decision-making processes. This study leverages work design theory to explore when and how perceived AI explainability impacts two types of employee job crafting: approach job crafting and avoidance job crafting. We analysed multi-wave survey data of 278 medical staff to examine the effects of perceived AI explainability on approach and avoidance job crafting through a dual-pathway model. Results indicated that perceived AI explainability enhanced AI-oriented benefit perception and reduced AI-oriented threat perception, resulting in an increase in approach and avoidance job crafting. Furthermore, our findings suggested that ethical climate strengthened the impacts of perceived AI explainability on AI-oriented benefit perception and AI-oriented threat perception. We discuss key theoretical insights of our findings for advancing AI and job crafting research as well as implications for organisational practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信