与痴呆症患者的家庭和无偿照顾者接受照顾者培训相关的因素

Jihye Kim , Yue Li , Sungchul Park , Hyunjee Kim , Yeunkyung Kim
{"title":"与痴呆症患者的家庭和无偿照顾者接受照顾者培训相关的因素","authors":"Jihye Kim ,&nbsp;Yue Li ,&nbsp;Sungchul Park ,&nbsp;Hyunjee Kim ,&nbsp;Yeunkyung Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.ahr.2025.100237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To investigate factors associated with the receipt of caregiver training among informal caregivers for people living with dementia in the community.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using three waves of the National Health and Aging Trends Study and the National Study of Caregiving data (2015, 2017, and 2021), the sample included 2606 family/unpaid caregivers who provided care assistance to community-dwelling older adults living with dementia. We conducted a multivariate logistic regression analysis with sampling weights to examine the factors associated with the receipt of training among caregivers for people living with dementia.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Findings indicated that 8.3 % of the caregivers received caregiver training. Non-Hispanic Black (odds ratio [OR], 2.02; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.30–3.15) and caregivers of other races (OR, 2.94; 95 % CI: 1.57–5.49) were more likely to receive training than non-Hispanic White caregivers. Spouse of care recipient (OR, 3.11; 95 % CI: 1.32–7.30), Medicaid-enrolled caregivers (OR, 2.52; 95 % CI: 1.44–4.41), caregivers who worked in the past week (OR, 2.12; 95 % CI: 1.21–3.70), and caregivers for those who needed assistance for multiple self-care or mobility tasks (OR, 2.22; 95 % CI: 1.24–4.00) were more likely to receive caregiver training than their respective counterparts.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Given the challenges of dementia caregiving and the potential beneficial effect of training, it is imperative for policy makers to promote both overall uptake rate of caregiver training and the rate among high-risk subgroups, to relieve caregiver burden and improve outcomes of both caregivers and care recipients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72129,"journal":{"name":"Aging and health research","volume":"5 3","pages":"Article 100237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with receipt of caregiver training among family and unpaid caregivers of people living with dementia\",\"authors\":\"Jihye Kim ,&nbsp;Yue Li ,&nbsp;Sungchul Park ,&nbsp;Hyunjee Kim ,&nbsp;Yeunkyung Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ahr.2025.100237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To investigate factors associated with the receipt of caregiver training among informal caregivers for people living with dementia in the community.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using three waves of the National Health and Aging Trends Study and the National Study of Caregiving data (2015, 2017, and 2021), the sample included 2606 family/unpaid caregivers who provided care assistance to community-dwelling older adults living with dementia. We conducted a multivariate logistic regression analysis with sampling weights to examine the factors associated with the receipt of training among caregivers for people living with dementia.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Findings indicated that 8.3 % of the caregivers received caregiver training. Non-Hispanic Black (odds ratio [OR], 2.02; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.30–3.15) and caregivers of other races (OR, 2.94; 95 % CI: 1.57–5.49) were more likely to receive training than non-Hispanic White caregivers. Spouse of care recipient (OR, 3.11; 95 % CI: 1.32–7.30), Medicaid-enrolled caregivers (OR, 2.52; 95 % CI: 1.44–4.41), caregivers who worked in the past week (OR, 2.12; 95 % CI: 1.21–3.70), and caregivers for those who needed assistance for multiple self-care or mobility tasks (OR, 2.22; 95 % CI: 1.24–4.00) were more likely to receive caregiver training than their respective counterparts.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Given the challenges of dementia caregiving and the potential beneficial effect of training, it is imperative for policy makers to promote both overall uptake rate of caregiver training and the rate among high-risk subgroups, to relieve caregiver burden and improve outcomes of both caregivers and care recipients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging and health research\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging and health research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667032125000186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging and health research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667032125000186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:调查社区中痴呆症患者非正式照护者接受照护者培训的相关因素。方法使用国家健康与老龄化趋势研究和国家护理研究数据(2015年,2017年和2021年)的三波数据,样本包括2606名家庭/无偿护理人员,他们为社区居住的老年痴呆症患者提供护理援助。我们进行了多变量logistic回归分析和抽样权,以检查与痴呆症患者护理人员接受培训相关的因素。结果8.3%的护理人员接受过护理人员培训。非西班牙裔黑人(优势比[OR], 2.02;95%置信区间[CI]: 1.30-3.15)和其他种族的照顾者(OR, 2.94;95% CI: 1.57-5.49)比非西班牙裔白人护理人员更有可能接受培训。受照护者配偶(OR, 3.11;95% CI: 1.32-7.30),参加医疗补助的护理人员(OR, 2.52;95% CI: 1.44-4.41),过去一周工作过的护理人员(OR, 2.12;95% CI: 1.21-3.70),以及那些需要帮助进行多种自我护理或活动任务的护理人员(or, 2.22;95% CI: 1.24-4.00)比他们各自的同行更有可能接受护理人员培训。结论考虑到痴呆护理面临的挑战和培训的潜在益处,政策制定者迫切需要提高护理人员培训的总体接受率和高危亚群的接受率,以减轻护理人员负担,改善护理人员和被护理者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors associated with receipt of caregiver training among family and unpaid caregivers of people living with dementia

Background

To investigate factors associated with the receipt of caregiver training among informal caregivers for people living with dementia in the community.

Methods

Using three waves of the National Health and Aging Trends Study and the National Study of Caregiving data (2015, 2017, and 2021), the sample included 2606 family/unpaid caregivers who provided care assistance to community-dwelling older adults living with dementia. We conducted a multivariate logistic regression analysis with sampling weights to examine the factors associated with the receipt of training among caregivers for people living with dementia.

Results

Findings indicated that 8.3 % of the caregivers received caregiver training. Non-Hispanic Black (odds ratio [OR], 2.02; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.30–3.15) and caregivers of other races (OR, 2.94; 95 % CI: 1.57–5.49) were more likely to receive training than non-Hispanic White caregivers. Spouse of care recipient (OR, 3.11; 95 % CI: 1.32–7.30), Medicaid-enrolled caregivers (OR, 2.52; 95 % CI: 1.44–4.41), caregivers who worked in the past week (OR, 2.12; 95 % CI: 1.21–3.70), and caregivers for those who needed assistance for multiple self-care or mobility tasks (OR, 2.22; 95 % CI: 1.24–4.00) were more likely to receive caregiver training than their respective counterparts.

Conclusions

Given the challenges of dementia caregiving and the potential beneficial effect of training, it is imperative for policy makers to promote both overall uptake rate of caregiver training and the rate among high-risk subgroups, to relieve caregiver burden and improve outcomes of both caregivers and care recipients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aging and health research
Aging and health research Clinical Neurology, Public Health and Health Policy, Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信