测量辐射暴露和剂量率与分析和计算方法的比较

IF 3.4
Syed F. Naeem*, Christopher R. Fitzgerald, Brian Champine and Tony Sorensen, 
{"title":"测量辐射暴露和剂量率与分析和计算方法的比较","authors":"Syed F. Naeem*,&nbsp;Christopher R. Fitzgerald,&nbsp;Brian Champine and Tony Sorensen,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.chas.4c0011510.1021/acs.chas.4c00115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Proper selection and utilization of survey instruments are important to fulfilling radiation survey needs. Ion chambers are typically used to survey β and γ-ray radiation, whereas REM balls containing helium-3 detectors are used to survey neutrons. While analytical calculations provide good estimates of radiation doses, it becomes challenging to estimate doses in the presence of shielding material(s) under complex geometries. γ doses are underestimated without accounting for buildup in the shielding equation. Commercially available software such as MicroShield can be used to calculate final γ radiation exposure, which relies on mathematical techniques to account for the radiation buildup in complex geometries. However, MicroShield is limited to assessing γ exposure and doses. Both γ and neutron radiation doses can be modeled using Monte Carlo particle transport methods in the computer code MCNP. Neutron and γ radiation doses from various spontaneous fission sources can also be modeled in the MCNP. However, this is dependent upon implementing proper fission models in the MCNP to calculate neutron and γ radiation doses. MicroShield in the default configuration cannot calculate γ radiation doses from spontaneous fission sources. However, the γ radiation dose from a spontaneous fission source can be correctly calculated in MicroShield if a γ spectrum is provided. MicroShield, MCNP, and analytical calculations show good agreement with measurements for γ sources used in the paper. On the other hand, MCNP and analytical calculations show good agreement with measurements for the spontaneous fission source used in the paper.</p>","PeriodicalId":73648,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chemical health & safety","volume":"32 3","pages":"259–265 259–265"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Measured Radiation Exposure and Dose Rates with Analytical and Computational Methods\",\"authors\":\"Syed F. Naeem*,&nbsp;Christopher R. Fitzgerald,&nbsp;Brian Champine and Tony Sorensen,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.chas.4c0011510.1021/acs.chas.4c00115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Proper selection and utilization of survey instruments are important to fulfilling radiation survey needs. Ion chambers are typically used to survey β and γ-ray radiation, whereas REM balls containing helium-3 detectors are used to survey neutrons. While analytical calculations provide good estimates of radiation doses, it becomes challenging to estimate doses in the presence of shielding material(s) under complex geometries. γ doses are underestimated without accounting for buildup in the shielding equation. Commercially available software such as MicroShield can be used to calculate final γ radiation exposure, which relies on mathematical techniques to account for the radiation buildup in complex geometries. However, MicroShield is limited to assessing γ exposure and doses. Both γ and neutron radiation doses can be modeled using Monte Carlo particle transport methods in the computer code MCNP. Neutron and γ radiation doses from various spontaneous fission sources can also be modeled in the MCNP. However, this is dependent upon implementing proper fission models in the MCNP to calculate neutron and γ radiation doses. MicroShield in the default configuration cannot calculate γ radiation doses from spontaneous fission sources. However, the γ radiation dose from a spontaneous fission source can be correctly calculated in MicroShield if a γ spectrum is provided. MicroShield, MCNP, and analytical calculations show good agreement with measurements for γ sources used in the paper. On the other hand, MCNP and analytical calculations show good agreement with measurements for the spontaneous fission source used in the paper.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of chemical health & safety\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"259–265 259–265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of chemical health & safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chas.4c00115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chemical health & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chas.4c00115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

正确选择和使用测量仪器是满足辐射测量需要的重要手段。离子室通常用于测量β和γ射线辐射,而含有氦-3探测器的REM球用于测量中子。虽然分析计算可以很好地估计辐射剂量,但在复杂几何形状下存在屏蔽材料的情况下,很难估计剂量。如果不考虑屏蔽方程中的累积,γ剂量被低估了。商业上可用的软件,如MicroShield,可以用来计算最终的γ辐射暴露,它依赖于数学技术来解释复杂几何形状的辐射积累。然而,MicroShield仅限于评估γ暴露和剂量。在计算机程序MCNP中,可以使用蒙特卡罗粒子输运方法模拟γ和中子辐射剂量。来自各种自发裂变源的中子和γ辐射剂量也可以在MCNP中建模。然而,这取决于在MCNP中实施适当的裂变模型来计算中子和γ辐射剂量。默认配置的微屏蔽不能计算自发裂变源的γ辐射剂量。然而,如果提供了γ谱,则可以在MicroShield中正确计算自发裂变源的γ辐射剂量。MicroShield、MCNP和分析计算结果与本文中使用的γ源测量结果吻合良好。另一方面,MCNP和解析计算与本文中使用的自发裂变源的测量结果吻合得很好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of Measured Radiation Exposure and Dose Rates with Analytical and Computational Methods

Comparison of Measured Radiation Exposure and Dose Rates with Analytical and Computational Methods

Proper selection and utilization of survey instruments are important to fulfilling radiation survey needs. Ion chambers are typically used to survey β and γ-ray radiation, whereas REM balls containing helium-3 detectors are used to survey neutrons. While analytical calculations provide good estimates of radiation doses, it becomes challenging to estimate doses in the presence of shielding material(s) under complex geometries. γ doses are underestimated without accounting for buildup in the shielding equation. Commercially available software such as MicroShield can be used to calculate final γ radiation exposure, which relies on mathematical techniques to account for the radiation buildup in complex geometries. However, MicroShield is limited to assessing γ exposure and doses. Both γ and neutron radiation doses can be modeled using Monte Carlo particle transport methods in the computer code MCNP. Neutron and γ radiation doses from various spontaneous fission sources can also be modeled in the MCNP. However, this is dependent upon implementing proper fission models in the MCNP to calculate neutron and γ radiation doses. MicroShield in the default configuration cannot calculate γ radiation doses from spontaneous fission sources. However, the γ radiation dose from a spontaneous fission source can be correctly calculated in MicroShield if a γ spectrum is provided. MicroShield, MCNP, and analytical calculations show good agreement with measurements for γ sources used in the paper. On the other hand, MCNP and analytical calculations show good agreement with measurements for the spontaneous fission source used in the paper.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信