涂料稀释剂成分血/气分割系数预测及吸入暴露危害评估

IF 3.4
Nishith Ghosh*, Pallavee Vitti Krushna, Jagdish D. Sharma and Alok Srivastava, 
{"title":"涂料稀释剂成分血/气分割系数预测及吸入暴露危害评估","authors":"Nishith Ghosh*,&nbsp;Pallavee Vitti Krushna,&nbsp;Jagdish D. Sharma and Alok Srivastava,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.chas.5c0000310.1021/acs.chas.5c00003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Paint thinners constitute a large variety of volatile organic compounds that pose inhalation exposure hazards to painters. Blood/air partition coefficients (<i>K</i><sub>ba</sub>) of the volatile organic compounds play a vital role in health risk assessment following their exposure through the inhalation route. However, experimentally determined <i>K</i><sub>ba</sub> values of the thinner ingredients are very limited. Here, we estimated the <i>K</i><sub>ba</sub> for a wide range of thinner ingredients (78 compounds; across various chemical classes) using quantitative property-property relationship (QPPR) models. Nearly 50% of these compounds lack an occupational exposure limit, e.g., threshold limit value (TLV) recommended by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). Our results reveal that <i>K</i><sub>ba</sub> of hydrocarbons (log <i>K</i><sub>ba</sub> ranges from −0.56 to 3.48; with mean: 1.33 and median: 1.51) is comparatively lower than that of polar ingredients (log <i>K</i><sub>ba</sub> ranges from 0.92 to 4.37; with mean: 2.88 and median: 2.93). Among the hydrocarbons, aromatic hydrocarbons show higher values of <i>K</i><sub>ba</sub> than aliphatic hydrocarbons (log <i>K</i><sub>ba</sub> ranges from −0.56 to 1.56 for aliphatic vs. 1.17 to 3.48 for aromatic). Moreover, the molecular structure and chain length of aliphatic hydrocarbons are observed to have a strong influence on their <i>K</i><sub>ba</sub> values. Further, we estimated the respiratory absorption factor (RAF) of the thinner ingredients, which is a crucial parameter in determining the actual inhalation dose. Comparative analysis of the <i>K</i><sub>ba</sub> and RAF facilitated the identification of several compounds that pose potential inhalation exposure hazards, although these compounds lack a TLV. The findings of this study will be useful in selecting safer thinner products and implementing suitable environmental and workplace interventions, such as engineering and personal controls for hazardous thinner products, to minimize harmful chemical exposure to painters. Additionally, these findings will aid in prioritizing chemicals for experimental health risk assessment of paint ingredients.</p>","PeriodicalId":73648,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chemical health & safety","volume":"32 3","pages":"297–306 297–306"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Blood/Air Partition Coefficients of Paint Thinner Ingredients and Assessing Their Inhalation Exposure Hazards\",\"authors\":\"Nishith Ghosh*,&nbsp;Pallavee Vitti Krushna,&nbsp;Jagdish D. Sharma and Alok Srivastava,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.chas.5c0000310.1021/acs.chas.5c00003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Paint thinners constitute a large variety of volatile organic compounds that pose inhalation exposure hazards to painters. Blood/air partition coefficients (<i>K</i><sub>ba</sub>) of the volatile organic compounds play a vital role in health risk assessment following their exposure through the inhalation route. However, experimentally determined <i>K</i><sub>ba</sub> values of the thinner ingredients are very limited. Here, we estimated the <i>K</i><sub>ba</sub> for a wide range of thinner ingredients (78 compounds; across various chemical classes) using quantitative property-property relationship (QPPR) models. Nearly 50% of these compounds lack an occupational exposure limit, e.g., threshold limit value (TLV) recommended by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). Our results reveal that <i>K</i><sub>ba</sub> of hydrocarbons (log <i>K</i><sub>ba</sub> ranges from −0.56 to 3.48; with mean: 1.33 and median: 1.51) is comparatively lower than that of polar ingredients (log <i>K</i><sub>ba</sub> ranges from 0.92 to 4.37; with mean: 2.88 and median: 2.93). Among the hydrocarbons, aromatic hydrocarbons show higher values of <i>K</i><sub>ba</sub> than aliphatic hydrocarbons (log <i>K</i><sub>ba</sub> ranges from −0.56 to 1.56 for aliphatic vs. 1.17 to 3.48 for aromatic). Moreover, the molecular structure and chain length of aliphatic hydrocarbons are observed to have a strong influence on their <i>K</i><sub>ba</sub> values. Further, we estimated the respiratory absorption factor (RAF) of the thinner ingredients, which is a crucial parameter in determining the actual inhalation dose. Comparative analysis of the <i>K</i><sub>ba</sub> and RAF facilitated the identification of several compounds that pose potential inhalation exposure hazards, although these compounds lack a TLV. The findings of this study will be useful in selecting safer thinner products and implementing suitable environmental and workplace interventions, such as engineering and personal controls for hazardous thinner products, to minimize harmful chemical exposure to painters. Additionally, these findings will aid in prioritizing chemicals for experimental health risk assessment of paint ingredients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of chemical health & safety\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"297–306 297–306\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of chemical health & safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chas.5c00003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chemical health & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chas.5c00003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

涂料稀释剂含有大量挥发性有机化合物,对油漆工造成吸入暴露危害。挥发性有机化合物的血/气分配系数(Kba)在通过吸入途径暴露后的健康风险评估中起着至关重要的作用。然而,通过实验确定的稀释剂成分的Kba值非常有限。在这里,我们估计了广泛范围内较薄成分的Kba(78种化合物;使用定量性质-性质关系(QPPR)模型。近50%的这些化合物缺乏职业暴露限值,例如美国政府工业卫生学家会议(ACGIH)建议的阈值限值(TLV)。结果表明:烃的Kba (log Kba在−0.56 ~ 3.48之间;平均值为1.33,中位数为1.51)相对低于极性成分(对数Kba范围为0.92 ~ 4.37;平均值:2.88,中位数:2.93)。烃类中,芳烃的Kba值高于脂肪烃(脂肪烃的log Kba值为- 0.56 ~ 1.56,芳烃的log Kba值为1.17 ~ 3.48)。此外,脂肪族烃的分子结构和链长对其Kba值有很大的影响。此外,我们估计了稀释剂成分的呼吸吸收因子(RAF),这是确定实际吸入剂量的关键参数。虽然这些化合物缺乏TLV,但对Kba和RAF的比较分析有助于识别几种具有潜在吸入暴露危害的化合物。这项研究的结果将有助于选择更安全的稀释剂产品,并实施适当的环境和工作场所干预措施,例如对危险稀释剂产品的工程和个人控制,以最大限度地减少对油漆工的有害化学物质暴露。此外,这些发现将有助于在油漆成分的实验健康风险评估中优先考虑化学品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Predicting Blood/Air Partition Coefficients of Paint Thinner Ingredients and Assessing Their Inhalation Exposure Hazards

Predicting Blood/Air Partition Coefficients of Paint Thinner Ingredients and Assessing Their Inhalation Exposure Hazards

Paint thinners constitute a large variety of volatile organic compounds that pose inhalation exposure hazards to painters. Blood/air partition coefficients (Kba) of the volatile organic compounds play a vital role in health risk assessment following their exposure through the inhalation route. However, experimentally determined Kba values of the thinner ingredients are very limited. Here, we estimated the Kba for a wide range of thinner ingredients (78 compounds; across various chemical classes) using quantitative property-property relationship (QPPR) models. Nearly 50% of these compounds lack an occupational exposure limit, e.g., threshold limit value (TLV) recommended by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). Our results reveal that Kba of hydrocarbons (log Kba ranges from −0.56 to 3.48; with mean: 1.33 and median: 1.51) is comparatively lower than that of polar ingredients (log Kba ranges from 0.92 to 4.37; with mean: 2.88 and median: 2.93). Among the hydrocarbons, aromatic hydrocarbons show higher values of Kba than aliphatic hydrocarbons (log Kba ranges from −0.56 to 1.56 for aliphatic vs. 1.17 to 3.48 for aromatic). Moreover, the molecular structure and chain length of aliphatic hydrocarbons are observed to have a strong influence on their Kba values. Further, we estimated the respiratory absorption factor (RAF) of the thinner ingredients, which is a crucial parameter in determining the actual inhalation dose. Comparative analysis of the Kba and RAF facilitated the identification of several compounds that pose potential inhalation exposure hazards, although these compounds lack a TLV. The findings of this study will be useful in selecting safer thinner products and implementing suitable environmental and workplace interventions, such as engineering and personal controls for hazardous thinner products, to minimize harmful chemical exposure to painters. Additionally, these findings will aid in prioritizing chemicals for experimental health risk assessment of paint ingredients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信