另类媒体与主流媒体:伊朗体育新闻中女性体育的代表与用户评论

IF 2.8 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Mahdi Latififard, Michael Mirer
{"title":"另类媒体与主流媒体:伊朗体育新闻中女性体育的代表与用户评论","authors":"Mahdi Latififard, Michael Mirer","doi":"10.1177/21674795251343267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This quantitative content analysis examines the framing of women’s sports in Iran by both mainstream and alternative media outlets and users’ comments on the posts. Data were collected in 2023 from Instagram pages representing mainstream (Varzesh3) and alternative (Iran International) media sources, yielding a sample of 149 posts and 14,442 user comments. The scheme code was executed based on data using quantitative content analysis and did not rely on previous research’s codebook. Media frames were categorized into seven thematic areas, while user responses were coded across eight distinct framing categories. Statistically significant differences emerged in some media frames. Significant differences in user framing were observed for all categories except one. Additionally, certain specific distinctions were observed in the framing of some media posts. User framing broadly reflected media-driven political orientations. The observed discrepancies between media and user framing underscore the critical role of the political information environment in shaping media consumption and production within both mainstream and alternative media contexts, suggesting that sports media can convene counter publics even in highly controlled media systems.","PeriodicalId":46882,"journal":{"name":"Communication & Sport","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative Versus Mainstream Media: Representing of Women’s Sport in Iranian Sports News and Users’ Comments\",\"authors\":\"Mahdi Latififard, Michael Mirer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21674795251343267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This quantitative content analysis examines the framing of women’s sports in Iran by both mainstream and alternative media outlets and users’ comments on the posts. Data were collected in 2023 from Instagram pages representing mainstream (Varzesh3) and alternative (Iran International) media sources, yielding a sample of 149 posts and 14,442 user comments. The scheme code was executed based on data using quantitative content analysis and did not rely on previous research’s codebook. Media frames were categorized into seven thematic areas, while user responses were coded across eight distinct framing categories. Statistically significant differences emerged in some media frames. Significant differences in user framing were observed for all categories except one. Additionally, certain specific distinctions were observed in the framing of some media posts. User framing broadly reflected media-driven political orientations. The observed discrepancies between media and user framing underscore the critical role of the political information environment in shaping media consumption and production within both mainstream and alternative media contexts, suggesting that sports media can convene counter publics even in highly controlled media systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communication & Sport\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communication & Sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795251343267\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication & Sport","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795251343267","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

此定量内容分析检视伊朗主流媒体与另类媒体对女性体育的建构,以及用户对帖子的评论。数据于2023年从代表主流(Varzesh3)和另类(伊朗国际)媒体来源的Instagram页面收集,产生149篇帖子和14,442条用户评论的样本。方案代码的执行基于定量内容分析的数据,不依赖于以往研究的代码本。媒体框架被分为七个主题领域,而用户的反应被编码为八个不同的框架类别。在一些媒体框架中出现了统计学上的显著差异。除一个类别外,所有类别的用户框架均存在显著差异。此外,在一些媒体职位的框架中观察到某些具体的区别。用户框架广泛反映了媒体驱动的政治倾向。观察到的媒体和用户框架之间的差异强调了政治信息环境在塑造主流和替代媒体背景下的媒体消费和生产方面的关键作用,这表明即使在高度控制的媒体系统中,体育媒体也可以召集反公众。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alternative Versus Mainstream Media: Representing of Women’s Sport in Iranian Sports News and Users’ Comments
This quantitative content analysis examines the framing of women’s sports in Iran by both mainstream and alternative media outlets and users’ comments on the posts. Data were collected in 2023 from Instagram pages representing mainstream (Varzesh3) and alternative (Iran International) media sources, yielding a sample of 149 posts and 14,442 user comments. The scheme code was executed based on data using quantitative content analysis and did not rely on previous research’s codebook. Media frames were categorized into seven thematic areas, while user responses were coded across eight distinct framing categories. Statistically significant differences emerged in some media frames. Significant differences in user framing were observed for all categories except one. Additionally, certain specific distinctions were observed in the framing of some media posts. User framing broadly reflected media-driven political orientations. The observed discrepancies between media and user framing underscore the critical role of the political information environment in shaping media consumption and production within both mainstream and alternative media contexts, suggesting that sports media can convene counter publics even in highly controlled media systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信