教学实践中龋齿管理中学生与患者首选的沟通技巧:一项质量改进研究。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Franklin Zhang, Juanna J Xie, Supattriya Chutinan, Christine A Riedy
{"title":"教学实践中龋齿管理中学生与患者首选的沟通技巧:一项质量改进研究。","authors":"Franklin Zhang, Juanna J Xie, Supattriya Chutinan, Christine A Riedy","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-07354-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clear and concise communication between providers and patients is the cornerstone of building trust and delivering effective medical and oral healthcare. The aim of this quality improvement study was to examine patient-provider communication during caries management sessions in an academic dental teaching practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Questionnaires were administered to student-providers (3rd and 4th years) and patients (age 18+) in the Harvard Dental Center Teaching Practice from July through December 2022. The student-provider questionnaire assessed challenges, adherence, and communication approaches used during caries management. The patient questionnaire focused on patients' communication preferences, understanding of caries, oral health literacy, and attitudes towards caries management. Descriptive analyses were calculated for both student-provider and patient data, and open-ended student-provider responses were analyzed using a content analysis and organized into themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Questionnaires were completed by 34 student-providers (50% response rate) and a convenience sample of 110 patients. Among student-providers who reported conducting a caries management session, all reported using simple language and 65.6% focused on discussing limited concepts at a time. Patients preferred simple language (54.8%), motivational interviewing (47.1%), and visual aids, such as models and x-rays (40.4%), to better understand concepts. A subset of student-providers (39.3%) reported challenges in effectively communicating and motivating patients to improve oral hygiene habits. Approximately half of the patients (55.2%) felt confident completing dental forms independently. Regarding their understanding of caries, 54.7% of patients responded that tooth decay will always necessitate fillings and 43.6% of patients responded that they will know when they have tooth decay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight the importance of interpersonal communication skill training in dental education to facilitate productive provider-patient communication, particularly in the context of caries risk assessment and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"764"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12102887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preferred communication techniques by student-providers and patients during caries management in a teaching practice: a quality improvement study.\",\"authors\":\"Franklin Zhang, Juanna J Xie, Supattriya Chutinan, Christine A Riedy\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12909-025-07354-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clear and concise communication between providers and patients is the cornerstone of building trust and delivering effective medical and oral healthcare. The aim of this quality improvement study was to examine patient-provider communication during caries management sessions in an academic dental teaching practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Questionnaires were administered to student-providers (3rd and 4th years) and patients (age 18+) in the Harvard Dental Center Teaching Practice from July through December 2022. The student-provider questionnaire assessed challenges, adherence, and communication approaches used during caries management. The patient questionnaire focused on patients' communication preferences, understanding of caries, oral health literacy, and attitudes towards caries management. Descriptive analyses were calculated for both student-provider and patient data, and open-ended student-provider responses were analyzed using a content analysis and organized into themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Questionnaires were completed by 34 student-providers (50% response rate) and a convenience sample of 110 patients. Among student-providers who reported conducting a caries management session, all reported using simple language and 65.6% focused on discussing limited concepts at a time. Patients preferred simple language (54.8%), motivational interviewing (47.1%), and visual aids, such as models and x-rays (40.4%), to better understand concepts. A subset of student-providers (39.3%) reported challenges in effectively communicating and motivating patients to improve oral hygiene habits. Approximately half of the patients (55.2%) felt confident completing dental forms independently. Regarding their understanding of caries, 54.7% of patients responded that tooth decay will always necessitate fillings and 43.6% of patients responded that they will know when they have tooth decay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight the importance of interpersonal communication skill training in dental education to facilitate productive provider-patient communication, particularly in the context of caries risk assessment and management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"764\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12102887/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07354-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07354-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:提供者和患者之间清晰和简洁的沟通是建立信任和提供有效的医疗和口腔保健的基石。本质量改进研究的目的是在牙科学术教学实践中检查龋病管理会议期间患者与提供者的沟通。方法:于2022年7月至12月对哈佛牙科中心教学实践的学生(3年级和4年级)和患者(18岁以上)进行问卷调查。学生-提供者问卷评估了龋齿管理过程中的挑战、依从性和沟通方法。患者问卷调查的重点是患者的沟通偏好、对龋齿的了解、口腔健康素养和对龋齿管理的态度。对学生-提供者和患者数据进行描述性分析,使用内容分析对开放式学生-提供者回答进行分析,并组织成主题。结果:34名学生服务提供者(50%的回复率)和110名患者的方便样本完成了问卷调查。在报告进行龋齿管理课程的学生提供者中,所有人都报告使用简单的语言,65.6%的人一次专注于讨论有限的概念。患者更喜欢简单的语言(54.8%),动机性访谈(47.1%)和视觉辅助,如模型和x射线(40.4%),以更好地理解概念。一部分学生服务提供者(39.3%)报告在有效沟通和激励患者改善口腔卫生习惯方面存在挑战。大约一半的患者(55.2%)有信心独立完成牙科表格。至于他们对蛀牙的认识,54.7%的病人回答蛀牙总是需要补牙,43.6%的病人回答他们会知道自己什么时候有蛀牙。结论:这些发现强调了人际沟通技巧培训在牙科教育中的重要性,以促进有效的医患沟通,特别是在龋病风险评估和管理方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preferred communication techniques by student-providers and patients during caries management in a teaching practice: a quality improvement study.

Background: Clear and concise communication between providers and patients is the cornerstone of building trust and delivering effective medical and oral healthcare. The aim of this quality improvement study was to examine patient-provider communication during caries management sessions in an academic dental teaching practice.

Methods: Questionnaires were administered to student-providers (3rd and 4th years) and patients (age 18+) in the Harvard Dental Center Teaching Practice from July through December 2022. The student-provider questionnaire assessed challenges, adherence, and communication approaches used during caries management. The patient questionnaire focused on patients' communication preferences, understanding of caries, oral health literacy, and attitudes towards caries management. Descriptive analyses were calculated for both student-provider and patient data, and open-ended student-provider responses were analyzed using a content analysis and organized into themes.

Results: Questionnaires were completed by 34 student-providers (50% response rate) and a convenience sample of 110 patients. Among student-providers who reported conducting a caries management session, all reported using simple language and 65.6% focused on discussing limited concepts at a time. Patients preferred simple language (54.8%), motivational interviewing (47.1%), and visual aids, such as models and x-rays (40.4%), to better understand concepts. A subset of student-providers (39.3%) reported challenges in effectively communicating and motivating patients to improve oral hygiene habits. Approximately half of the patients (55.2%) felt confident completing dental forms independently. Regarding their understanding of caries, 54.7% of patients responded that tooth decay will always necessitate fillings and 43.6% of patients responded that they will know when they have tooth decay.

Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of interpersonal communication skill training in dental education to facilitate productive provider-patient communication, particularly in the context of caries risk assessment and management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信