临床前可卡因选择程序对可卡因和非药物强化物的经济可替代性的机制和转化见解。

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Madison M. Marcus , Matthew L. Banks
{"title":"临床前可卡因选择程序对可卡因和非药物强化物的经济可替代性的机制和转化见解。","authors":"Madison M. Marcus ,&nbsp;Matthew L. Banks","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Substance use disorders are increasingly being conceptualized as behavioral misallocation disorders; however, the neurobiological determinants of this behavioral misallocation are poorly understood. Cocaine use disorder (CUD) develops as a result of behavior being disproportionally directed towards the procurement and use of cocaine at the expense of behaviors maintained by more adaptive, nondrug reinforcers (i.e., job, family). Preclinical cocaine-vs-nondrug reinforcer choice procedures are uniquely positioned to 1) elucidate the biological mechanisms of drug and nondrug reinforcement and 2) inform the development of effective pharmacological and behavioral CUD therapies. Accordingly, this review addresses the existing preclinical literature regarding the economic substitutability and mesolimbic dopaminergic mechanisms underlying cocaine self-administration in the context of three different concurrently available nondrug reinforcers: food, social interaction, and electric foot shock (a negative reinforcer). The manuscript focuses on how the existing cocaine-vs-nondrug reinforcer choice literature guides future research directions to facilitate advances in understanding of CUD from both a neuroscience and translational research perspective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 106217"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanistic and translational insights from preclinical cocaine choice procedures on the economic substitutability of cocaine and nondrug reinforcers\",\"authors\":\"Madison M. Marcus ,&nbsp;Matthew L. Banks\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Substance use disorders are increasingly being conceptualized as behavioral misallocation disorders; however, the neurobiological determinants of this behavioral misallocation are poorly understood. Cocaine use disorder (CUD) develops as a result of behavior being disproportionally directed towards the procurement and use of cocaine at the expense of behaviors maintained by more adaptive, nondrug reinforcers (i.e., job, family). Preclinical cocaine-vs-nondrug reinforcer choice procedures are uniquely positioned to 1) elucidate the biological mechanisms of drug and nondrug reinforcement and 2) inform the development of effective pharmacological and behavioral CUD therapies. Accordingly, this review addresses the existing preclinical literature regarding the economic substitutability and mesolimbic dopaminergic mechanisms underlying cocaine self-administration in the context of three different concurrently available nondrug reinforcers: food, social interaction, and electric foot shock (a negative reinforcer). The manuscript focuses on how the existing cocaine-vs-nondrug reinforcer choice literature guides future research directions to facilitate advances in understanding of CUD from both a neuroscience and translational research perspective.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews\",\"volume\":\"175 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106217\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763425002179\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763425002179","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

物质使用障碍越来越多地被定义为行为分配不当障碍;然而,这种行为分配不当的神经生物学决定因素知之甚少。可卡因使用障碍(CUD)的发展是由于行为不成比例地指向可卡因的获取和使用,而牺牲了更具适应性的非药物强化物(即工作,家庭)维持的行为。临床前可卡因与非药物强化剂的选择程序具有独特的定位:1)阐明药物和非药物强化剂的生物学机制;2)为有效的药物和行为CUD治疗的发展提供信息。因此,本文回顾了现有的临床前文献,探讨了在三种不同的同时可用的非药物强化物:食物、社会互动和足电(一种负强化物)的背景下,可卡因自我给药的经济可替代性和中脑边缘多巴胺能机制。该手稿着重于现有的可卡因与非药物强化物选择文献如何指导未来的研究方向,以促进从神经科学和转化研究的角度对CUD的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mechanistic and translational insights from preclinical cocaine choice procedures on the economic substitutability of cocaine and nondrug reinforcers
Substance use disorders are increasingly being conceptualized as behavioral misallocation disorders; however, the neurobiological determinants of this behavioral misallocation are poorly understood. Cocaine use disorder (CUD) develops as a result of behavior being disproportionally directed towards the procurement and use of cocaine at the expense of behaviors maintained by more adaptive, nondrug reinforcers (i.e., job, family). Preclinical cocaine-vs-nondrug reinforcer choice procedures are uniquely positioned to 1) elucidate the biological mechanisms of drug and nondrug reinforcement and 2) inform the development of effective pharmacological and behavioral CUD therapies. Accordingly, this review addresses the existing preclinical literature regarding the economic substitutability and mesolimbic dopaminergic mechanisms underlying cocaine self-administration in the context of three different concurrently available nondrug reinforcers: food, social interaction, and electric foot shock (a negative reinforcer). The manuscript focuses on how the existing cocaine-vs-nondrug reinforcer choice literature guides future research directions to facilitate advances in understanding of CUD from both a neuroscience and translational research perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信