2019 - 2023年全国重复横断面调查显示,我国麻醉医师术后康复的现状及未来教育意义

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yuelun Zhang, Zijia Liu, Lulu Ma, Xu Li, Qianmei Zhu, Guonian Wang, Jing Cang, Yugang Diao, Tiezheng Zhang, Le Shen, Yuguang Huang
{"title":"2019 - 2023年全国重复横断面调查显示,我国麻醉医师术后康复的现状及未来教育意义","authors":"Yuelun Zhang, Zijia Liu, Lulu Ma, Xu Li, Qianmei Zhu, Guonian Wang, Jing Cang, Yugang Diao, Tiezheng Zhang, Le Shen, Yuguang Huang","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-07351-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been widely adopted to improve surgical outcomes. In this study, we aimed to assess the current state of awareness and specific knowledge of ERAS among Chinese anesthesiologists, examine difficulties in implementation, and identify future priorities for ERAS education and training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A self-designed, repeated national survey regarding awareness and practice of the ERAS concept, specific knowledge, learning modalities, and difficulties in ERAS implementation was conducted in 2019, 2021, and 2023. Factors related to mastery of knowledge were analyzed via subgroup analysis and multivariable linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6385 participants were included; 96.2% were anesthesiologists. Approximately half of the participants reported implementing ERAS in more than 40% of patients. Compared with those in the 2019 survey, the overall proportion of participants who had heard about the concept of ERAS remained relatively stable across the three surveys (P = 0.078). However, significant improvements were observed in participants reported good understanding (defined as responding \"very familiar\" or \"quite familiar\") of ERAS and implementing rate of ERAS in clinical practice (P < 0.001). The mean score on the 15-question quiz was 8.5 ± 2.5. Significant differences in scores were observed across various geographic regions, levels of hospitals, education, professional titles, and age. Most anesthesiologists expressed a strong desire for additional education on ERAS in several ways. Feedback from the open-ended question in the survey indicated that multidisciplinary collaboration was a major challenge in implementing ERAS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This nationwide study indicates a notable enhancement in the comprehension and implementation of ERAS among Chinese anesthesiologists, although there is still room for improvement. Future efforts should focus on improving education and training to enhance ERAS knowledge and practice levels among health care providers.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"765"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current state and future education implication of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) among Chinese anesthesiologists: national repeated cross-sectional surveys from 2019 to 2023.\",\"authors\":\"Yuelun Zhang, Zijia Liu, Lulu Ma, Xu Li, Qianmei Zhu, Guonian Wang, Jing Cang, Yugang Diao, Tiezheng Zhang, Le Shen, Yuguang Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12909-025-07351-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been widely adopted to improve surgical outcomes. In this study, we aimed to assess the current state of awareness and specific knowledge of ERAS among Chinese anesthesiologists, examine difficulties in implementation, and identify future priorities for ERAS education and training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A self-designed, repeated national survey regarding awareness and practice of the ERAS concept, specific knowledge, learning modalities, and difficulties in ERAS implementation was conducted in 2019, 2021, and 2023. Factors related to mastery of knowledge were analyzed via subgroup analysis and multivariable linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6385 participants were included; 96.2% were anesthesiologists. Approximately half of the participants reported implementing ERAS in more than 40% of patients. Compared with those in the 2019 survey, the overall proportion of participants who had heard about the concept of ERAS remained relatively stable across the three surveys (P = 0.078). However, significant improvements were observed in participants reported good understanding (defined as responding \\\"very familiar\\\" or \\\"quite familiar\\\") of ERAS and implementing rate of ERAS in clinical practice (P < 0.001). The mean score on the 15-question quiz was 8.5 ± 2.5. Significant differences in scores were observed across various geographic regions, levels of hospitals, education, professional titles, and age. Most anesthesiologists expressed a strong desire for additional education on ERAS in several ways. Feedback from the open-ended question in the survey indicated that multidisciplinary collaboration was a major challenge in implementing ERAS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This nationwide study indicates a notable enhancement in the comprehension and implementation of ERAS among Chinese anesthesiologists, although there is still room for improvement. Future efforts should focus on improving education and training to enhance ERAS knowledge and practice levels among health care providers.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"765\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103054/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07351-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07351-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:增强术后恢复(ERAS)方案已被广泛采用,以提高手术效果。在本研究中,我们旨在评估中国麻醉医师对ERAS的认知现状和具体知识,检查实施中的困难,并确定未来ERAS教育和培训的重点。方法:于2019年、2021年和2023年在全国范围内对ERAS概念的认识和实践、具体知识、学习方式和实施ERAS的难点进行自行设计的重复调查。通过亚组分析和多元线性回归分析与知识掌握相关的因素。结果:共纳入6385名受试者;96.2%为麻醉师。大约一半的参与者报告在超过40%的患者中实施了ERAS。与2019年的调查相比,三次调查中听说过ERAS概念的参与者的总体比例保持相对稳定(P = 0.078)。然而,参与者对ERAS的理解(定义为回答“非常熟悉”或“相当熟悉”)和临床实践中ERAS的执行率显著提高(P结论:这项全国范围的研究表明,中国麻醉医师对ERAS的理解和实施有显著提高,尽管仍有改进的空间。今后的努力应侧重于改善教育和培训,以提高医疗保健提供者的ERAS知识和实践水平。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current state and future education implication of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) among Chinese anesthesiologists: national repeated cross-sectional surveys from 2019 to 2023.

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been widely adopted to improve surgical outcomes. In this study, we aimed to assess the current state of awareness and specific knowledge of ERAS among Chinese anesthesiologists, examine difficulties in implementation, and identify future priorities for ERAS education and training.

Methods: A self-designed, repeated national survey regarding awareness and practice of the ERAS concept, specific knowledge, learning modalities, and difficulties in ERAS implementation was conducted in 2019, 2021, and 2023. Factors related to mastery of knowledge were analyzed via subgroup analysis and multivariable linear regression.

Results: A total of 6385 participants were included; 96.2% were anesthesiologists. Approximately half of the participants reported implementing ERAS in more than 40% of patients. Compared with those in the 2019 survey, the overall proportion of participants who had heard about the concept of ERAS remained relatively stable across the three surveys (P = 0.078). However, significant improvements were observed in participants reported good understanding (defined as responding "very familiar" or "quite familiar") of ERAS and implementing rate of ERAS in clinical practice (P < 0.001). The mean score on the 15-question quiz was 8.5 ± 2.5. Significant differences in scores were observed across various geographic regions, levels of hospitals, education, professional titles, and age. Most anesthesiologists expressed a strong desire for additional education on ERAS in several ways. Feedback from the open-ended question in the survey indicated that multidisciplinary collaboration was a major challenge in implementing ERAS.

Conclusions: This nationwide study indicates a notable enhancement in the comprehension and implementation of ERAS among Chinese anesthesiologists, although there is still room for improvement. Future efforts should focus on improving education and training to enhance ERAS knowledge and practice levels among health care providers.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信