Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Alan D Kaye, Mahendra R Sanapati, Nebojsa Nick Knezevic, Vivekanand Manocha, Joshua A Hirsch
{"title":"植入式周围神经刺激(PNS)治疗慢性疼痛指南综述。","authors":"Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Alan D Kaye, Mahendra R Sanapati, Nebojsa Nick Knezevic, Vivekanand Manocha, Joshua A Hirsch","doi":"10.1007/s11916-025-01397-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This article assesses the current evidence and guidelines on peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and provides recommendations for its use in managing moderate to severe chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>PNS has been utilized for over 50 years in the treatment of chronic pain. However, since 2015, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved percutaneously implanted PNS leads and neurostimulators, providing a minimally invasive, non-opioid alternative for managing persistent and refractory chronic pain. The American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) has established evidence-based consensus guidelines for the clinical use of PNS systems in addressing chronic pain. ASIPP guidelines performed extensive evidence synthesis, including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and observational studies using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria or certainty of evidence, and qualitative synthesis based on the best available evidence. The evidence level and recommendations showed fair evidence with moderate strength of recommendation for implantable PNS systems following a trial or selective lumbar medial branch stimulation without a trial and for temporary PNS for 60 days. This review offers a comprehensive analysis of peripheral neuropathic pain as a cause of chronic, intractable, function-limiting, and high-impact pain. It discusses the diagnosis of peripheral nerve and neuropathic pain, evidence evaluation and synthesis, medical necessity criteria, patient education, and clinical recommendations. The goal is to enhance patient outcomes by integrating PNS technology into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"29 1","pages":"89"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of Guidelines for Implantable Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) in the Management of Chronic Pain.\",\"authors\":\"Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Alan D Kaye, Mahendra R Sanapati, Nebojsa Nick Knezevic, Vivekanand Manocha, Joshua A Hirsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11916-025-01397-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This article assesses the current evidence and guidelines on peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and provides recommendations for its use in managing moderate to severe chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>PNS has been utilized for over 50 years in the treatment of chronic pain. However, since 2015, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved percutaneously implanted PNS leads and neurostimulators, providing a minimally invasive, non-opioid alternative for managing persistent and refractory chronic pain. The American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) has established evidence-based consensus guidelines for the clinical use of PNS systems in addressing chronic pain. ASIPP guidelines performed extensive evidence synthesis, including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and observational studies using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria or certainty of evidence, and qualitative synthesis based on the best available evidence. The evidence level and recommendations showed fair evidence with moderate strength of recommendation for implantable PNS systems following a trial or selective lumbar medial branch stimulation without a trial and for temporary PNS for 60 days. This review offers a comprehensive analysis of peripheral neuropathic pain as a cause of chronic, intractable, function-limiting, and high-impact pain. It discusses the diagnosis of peripheral nerve and neuropathic pain, evidence evaluation and synthesis, medical necessity criteria, patient education, and clinical recommendations. The goal is to enhance patient outcomes by integrating PNS technology into clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Pain and Headache Reports\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Pain and Headache Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-025-01397-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-025-01397-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Review of Guidelines for Implantable Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) in the Management of Chronic Pain.
Purpose of review: This article assesses the current evidence and guidelines on peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and provides recommendations for its use in managing moderate to severe chronic pain.
Recent findings: PNS has been utilized for over 50 years in the treatment of chronic pain. However, since 2015, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved percutaneously implanted PNS leads and neurostimulators, providing a minimally invasive, non-opioid alternative for managing persistent and refractory chronic pain. The American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) has established evidence-based consensus guidelines for the clinical use of PNS systems in addressing chronic pain. ASIPP guidelines performed extensive evidence synthesis, including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and observational studies using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria or certainty of evidence, and qualitative synthesis based on the best available evidence. The evidence level and recommendations showed fair evidence with moderate strength of recommendation for implantable PNS systems following a trial or selective lumbar medial branch stimulation without a trial and for temporary PNS for 60 days. This review offers a comprehensive analysis of peripheral neuropathic pain as a cause of chronic, intractable, function-limiting, and high-impact pain. It discusses the diagnosis of peripheral nerve and neuropathic pain, evidence evaluation and synthesis, medical necessity criteria, patient education, and clinical recommendations. The goal is to enhance patient outcomes by integrating PNS technology into clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
This journal aims to review the most important, recently published clinical findings regarding the diagnosis, treatment, and management of pain and headache. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care and prevention of pain and headache.
We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as anesthetic techniques in pain management, cluster headache, neuropathic pain, and migraine. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.