植入式周围神经刺激(PNS)治疗慢性疼痛指南综述。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Alan D Kaye, Mahendra R Sanapati, Nebojsa Nick Knezevic, Vivekanand Manocha, Joshua A Hirsch
{"title":"植入式周围神经刺激(PNS)治疗慢性疼痛指南综述。","authors":"Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Alan D Kaye, Mahendra R Sanapati, Nebojsa Nick Knezevic, Vivekanand Manocha, Joshua A Hirsch","doi":"10.1007/s11916-025-01397-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This article assesses the current evidence and guidelines on peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and provides recommendations for its use in managing moderate to severe chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>PNS has been utilized for over 50 years in the treatment of chronic pain. However, since 2015, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved percutaneously implanted PNS leads and neurostimulators, providing a minimally invasive, non-opioid alternative for managing persistent and refractory chronic pain. The American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) has established evidence-based consensus guidelines for the clinical use of PNS systems in addressing chronic pain. ASIPP guidelines performed extensive evidence synthesis, including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and observational studies using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria or certainty of evidence, and qualitative synthesis based on the best available evidence. The evidence level and recommendations showed fair evidence with moderate strength of recommendation for implantable PNS systems following a trial or selective lumbar medial branch stimulation without a trial and for temporary PNS for 60 days. This review offers a comprehensive analysis of peripheral neuropathic pain as a cause of chronic, intractable, function-limiting, and high-impact pain. It discusses the diagnosis of peripheral nerve and neuropathic pain, evidence evaluation and synthesis, medical necessity criteria, patient education, and clinical recommendations. The goal is to enhance patient outcomes by integrating PNS technology into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"29 1","pages":"89"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of Guidelines for Implantable Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) in the Management of Chronic Pain.\",\"authors\":\"Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Alan D Kaye, Mahendra R Sanapati, Nebojsa Nick Knezevic, Vivekanand Manocha, Joshua A Hirsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11916-025-01397-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This article assesses the current evidence and guidelines on peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and provides recommendations for its use in managing moderate to severe chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>PNS has been utilized for over 50 years in the treatment of chronic pain. However, since 2015, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved percutaneously implanted PNS leads and neurostimulators, providing a minimally invasive, non-opioid alternative for managing persistent and refractory chronic pain. The American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) has established evidence-based consensus guidelines for the clinical use of PNS systems in addressing chronic pain. ASIPP guidelines performed extensive evidence synthesis, including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and observational studies using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria or certainty of evidence, and qualitative synthesis based on the best available evidence. The evidence level and recommendations showed fair evidence with moderate strength of recommendation for implantable PNS systems following a trial or selective lumbar medial branch stimulation without a trial and for temporary PNS for 60 days. This review offers a comprehensive analysis of peripheral neuropathic pain as a cause of chronic, intractable, function-limiting, and high-impact pain. It discusses the diagnosis of peripheral nerve and neuropathic pain, evidence evaluation and synthesis, medical necessity criteria, patient education, and clinical recommendations. The goal is to enhance patient outcomes by integrating PNS technology into clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Pain and Headache Reports\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Pain and Headache Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-025-01397-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-025-01397-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:本文评估了周围神经刺激(PNS)的现有证据和指南,并为其在中重度慢性疼痛治疗中的应用提供了建议。最近发现:PNS在慢性疼痛的治疗中已经使用了50多年。然而,自2015年以来,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)已批准经皮植入PNS导联和神经刺激器,为治疗持续性和难治性慢性疼痛提供了一种微创、非阿片类药物的替代方案。美国介入性疼痛医师协会(ASIPP)已经为PNS系统在治疗慢性疼痛方面的临床应用建立了基于证据的共识指南。ASIPP指南进行了广泛的证据综合,包括系统评价、随机对照试验(rct)和使用推荐、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)标准或证据确定性的观察性研究,以及基于现有最佳证据的定性综合。证据水平和建议显示了公平的证据,中等强度的推荐用于在试验后植入PNS系统或选择性腰椎内侧支刺激而不进行试验和临时PNS 60天。这篇综述全面分析了周围神经性疼痛作为慢性、难治性、功能限制性和高冲击性疼痛的原因。它讨论了周围神经和神经性疼痛的诊断、证据评估和综合、医疗必要性标准、患者教育和临床建议。目标是通过将PNS技术整合到临床实践中来提高患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review of Guidelines for Implantable Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) in the Management of Chronic Pain.

Purpose of review: This article assesses the current evidence and guidelines on peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and provides recommendations for its use in managing moderate to severe chronic pain.

Recent findings: PNS has been utilized for over 50 years in the treatment of chronic pain. However, since 2015, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved percutaneously implanted PNS leads and neurostimulators, providing a minimally invasive, non-opioid alternative for managing persistent and refractory chronic pain. The American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) has established evidence-based consensus guidelines for the clinical use of PNS systems in addressing chronic pain. ASIPP guidelines performed extensive evidence synthesis, including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and observational studies using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria or certainty of evidence, and qualitative synthesis based on the best available evidence. The evidence level and recommendations showed fair evidence with moderate strength of recommendation for implantable PNS systems following a trial or selective lumbar medial branch stimulation without a trial and for temporary PNS for 60 days. This review offers a comprehensive analysis of peripheral neuropathic pain as a cause of chronic, intractable, function-limiting, and high-impact pain. It discusses the diagnosis of peripheral nerve and neuropathic pain, evidence evaluation and synthesis, medical necessity criteria, patient education, and clinical recommendations. The goal is to enhance patient outcomes by integrating PNS technology into clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Pain and Headache Reports
Current Pain and Headache Reports CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published clinical findings regarding the diagnosis, treatment, and management of pain and headache. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care and prevention of pain and headache. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as anesthetic techniques in pain management, cluster headache, neuropathic pain, and migraine. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信