相对于二维GRE定量敏感性定位在脑微出血检测中的临床应用。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sabina Iqbal, Nikita Seth, Tamkin Shahraki, Aristotelis Filippidis, Magdy Selim, Ajith J Thomas, Yan Wen, Pascal Spincemaille, Yi Wang, Salil Soman
{"title":"相对于二维GRE定量敏感性定位在脑微出血检测中的临床应用。","authors":"Sabina Iqbal, Nikita Seth, Tamkin Shahraki, Aristotelis Filippidis, Magdy Selim, Ajith J Thomas, Yan Wen, Pascal Spincemaille, Yi Wang, Salil Soman","doi":"10.1007/s00062-025-01529-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the potential overestimation of cerebral microbleed (CMB) burden by Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) compared to 2D gradient recalled echo (2D GRE), as well as the impact of increased motion degradation due to longer scan times, reduced CMB detection from skull-stripping failures, and the relative visibility of CMBs between techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-nine adult subjects with intracranial hemorrhage underwent same-session brain MRI including 2D GRE and multi-echo GRE for QSM processing, as part of routine clinical care. Images were reviewed by a neuroradiologist and trained research assistant for CMB detection, visibility rating, and anatomical distribution. Motion artifacts and areas of non-visualized brain due to skull-stripping were assessed. Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for CMB counts, Mann-Whitney U test for motion assessment, and Fisher's exact testing for anatomical distribution patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>QSM showed no significant difference in median CMB counts compared to 2D GRE (1 vs 2, p = 0.175) with strong correlation (r = 0.879, p < 1.65e-26). No significant difference in motion degradation was found between techniques (p = 0.7465). Skull-stripping failures affected only 2% of candidate CMBs, in 5 of 79 (6%) subjects. QSM-detected CMBs showed superior conspicuity (73 vs 33 better visualized lesions, p = 0.00975) with 261 rated equally visible. QSM identified 26 calcifications in 20 subjects, 25 of which were misclassified as CMBs on 2D GRE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>QSM demonstrates comparable or slightly lower CMB counts than 2D GRE while offering superior lesion conspicuity and ability to distinguish calcifications, supporting its potential clinical implementation for CMB detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":49298,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Performance of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping in Cerebral Microbleed Detection Relative to 2D GRE.\",\"authors\":\"Sabina Iqbal, Nikita Seth, Tamkin Shahraki, Aristotelis Filippidis, Magdy Selim, Ajith J Thomas, Yan Wen, Pascal Spincemaille, Yi Wang, Salil Soman\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00062-025-01529-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the potential overestimation of cerebral microbleed (CMB) burden by Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) compared to 2D gradient recalled echo (2D GRE), as well as the impact of increased motion degradation due to longer scan times, reduced CMB detection from skull-stripping failures, and the relative visibility of CMBs between techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-nine adult subjects with intracranial hemorrhage underwent same-session brain MRI including 2D GRE and multi-echo GRE for QSM processing, as part of routine clinical care. Images were reviewed by a neuroradiologist and trained research assistant for CMB detection, visibility rating, and anatomical distribution. Motion artifacts and areas of non-visualized brain due to skull-stripping were assessed. Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for CMB counts, Mann-Whitney U test for motion assessment, and Fisher's exact testing for anatomical distribution patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>QSM showed no significant difference in median CMB counts compared to 2D GRE (1 vs 2, p = 0.175) with strong correlation (r = 0.879, p < 1.65e-26). No significant difference in motion degradation was found between techniques (p = 0.7465). Skull-stripping failures affected only 2% of candidate CMBs, in 5 of 79 (6%) subjects. QSM-detected CMBs showed superior conspicuity (73 vs 33 better visualized lesions, p = 0.00975) with 261 rated equally visible. QSM identified 26 calcifications in 20 subjects, 25 of which were misclassified as CMBs on 2D GRE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>QSM demonstrates comparable or slightly lower CMB counts than 2D GRE while offering superior lesion conspicuity and ability to distinguish calcifications, supporting its potential clinical implementation for CMB detection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-025-01529-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-025-01529-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估定量敏感性测绘(QSM)与2D梯度回忆回波(2D GRE)相比对脑微出血(CMB)负担的潜在高估,以及扫描时间延长导致的运动退化增加的影响,颅骨剥离失败导致的CMB检测减少,以及不同技术之间CMB的相对可见性。方法:79例颅内出血的成人受试者,作为常规临床护理的一部分,进行同期脑MRI(包括二维GRE和多回波GRE)处理QSM。图像由神经放射学家和训练有素的研究助理对CMB检测、可见度评级和解剖分布进行审查。评估运动伪影和因颅骨剥离导致的非可视化脑区。统计分析包括对CMB计数的Wilcoxon sign -rank检验,对运动评估的Mann-Whitney U检验,以及对解剖分布模式的Fisher精确检验。结果:与2D GRE相比,QSM的中位CMB计数无显著差异(1 vs 2, p = 0.175),相关性强(r = 0.879,p )。结论:QSM的CMB计数与2D GRE相当或略低,但具有更好的病变显著性和区分钙化的能力,支持其在CMB检测中的潜在临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Performance of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping in Cerebral Microbleed Detection Relative to 2D GRE.

Purpose: To evaluate the potential overestimation of cerebral microbleed (CMB) burden by Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) compared to 2D gradient recalled echo (2D GRE), as well as the impact of increased motion degradation due to longer scan times, reduced CMB detection from skull-stripping failures, and the relative visibility of CMBs between techniques.

Methods: Seventy-nine adult subjects with intracranial hemorrhage underwent same-session brain MRI including 2D GRE and multi-echo GRE for QSM processing, as part of routine clinical care. Images were reviewed by a neuroradiologist and trained research assistant for CMB detection, visibility rating, and anatomical distribution. Motion artifacts and areas of non-visualized brain due to skull-stripping were assessed. Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for CMB counts, Mann-Whitney U test for motion assessment, and Fisher's exact testing for anatomical distribution patterns.

Results: QSM showed no significant difference in median CMB counts compared to 2D GRE (1 vs 2, p = 0.175) with strong correlation (r = 0.879, p < 1.65e-26). No significant difference in motion degradation was found between techniques (p = 0.7465). Skull-stripping failures affected only 2% of candidate CMBs, in 5 of 79 (6%) subjects. QSM-detected CMBs showed superior conspicuity (73 vs 33 better visualized lesions, p = 0.00975) with 261 rated equally visible. QSM identified 26 calcifications in 20 subjects, 25 of which were misclassified as CMBs on 2D GRE.

Conclusion: QSM demonstrates comparable or slightly lower CMB counts than 2D GRE while offering superior lesion conspicuity and ability to distinguish calcifications, supporting its potential clinical implementation for CMB detection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuroradiology
Clinical Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
106
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuroradiology provides current information, original contributions, and reviews in the field of neuroradiology. An interdisciplinary approach is accomplished by diagnostic and therapeutic contributions related to associated subjects. The international coverage and relevance of the journal is underlined by its being the official journal of the German, Swiss, and Austrian Societies of Neuroradiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信