少即是多:评估计划卵母细胞冷冻保存周期中的触发类型。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Simone Elder, Laura K Kaizer, Mary D Sammel, Cassandra Roeca
{"title":"少即是多:评估计划卵母细胞冷冻保存周期中的触发类型。","authors":"Simone Elder, Laura K Kaizer, Mary D Sammel, Cassandra Roeca","doi":"10.1007/s10815-025-03514-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare oocyte yield and maturation with dual vs. agonist-only trigger for individuals with unknown fertility undergoing planned oocyte cryopreservation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of 1002 planned oocyte cryopreservation cycles among 864 patients from January 2010 to March 2023 who received gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist-only (GnRHa-only) trigger vs. \"dual trigger\" or GnRH-a with human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) 1500-10,000 IU. The main outcomes were total number of oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes, and maturity rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjusting for age, anti-Müllerian hormone, body mass index, antral follicle count, and max gonadotropin dose, all dual trigger groups had significantly lower oocytes retrieved compared with the GnRHa-only trigger (p-values < 0.02). Additionally, the maturation rate was 10% lower in dual trigger with HCG 10,000 IU compared to GnRH agonist-only trigger (rate ratio = 0.9, p = 0.003). Dual triggers with lower doses of HCG (1500 and 5000 IU) had higher amounts of oocytes retrieved than dual trigger with HCG 10,000 IU, but there was no difference in maturity rate within dual triggers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a cohort undergoing planned oocyte cryopreservation, the GnRHa-only trigger had higher oocyte yield compared to dual triggers after adjusting for age, anti-Müllerian hormone, body mass index, antral follicle count, and gonadotropin dosing. GnRHa-only triggers have a higher maturity rate than a dual trigger with high HCG. A prospective study is needed to evaluate this further to remove treatment assignment bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Less is more: assessing trigger types in planned oocyte cryopreservation cycles.\",\"authors\":\"Simone Elder, Laura K Kaizer, Mary D Sammel, Cassandra Roeca\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10815-025-03514-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare oocyte yield and maturation with dual vs. agonist-only trigger for individuals with unknown fertility undergoing planned oocyte cryopreservation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of 1002 planned oocyte cryopreservation cycles among 864 patients from January 2010 to March 2023 who received gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist-only (GnRHa-only) trigger vs. \\\"dual trigger\\\" or GnRH-a with human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) 1500-10,000 IU. The main outcomes were total number of oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes, and maturity rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjusting for age, anti-Müllerian hormone, body mass index, antral follicle count, and max gonadotropin dose, all dual trigger groups had significantly lower oocytes retrieved compared with the GnRHa-only trigger (p-values < 0.02). Additionally, the maturation rate was 10% lower in dual trigger with HCG 10,000 IU compared to GnRH agonist-only trigger (rate ratio = 0.9, p = 0.003). Dual triggers with lower doses of HCG (1500 and 5000 IU) had higher amounts of oocytes retrieved than dual trigger with HCG 10,000 IU, but there was no difference in maturity rate within dual triggers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a cohort undergoing planned oocyte cryopreservation, the GnRHa-only trigger had higher oocyte yield compared to dual triggers after adjusting for age, anti-Müllerian hormone, body mass index, antral follicle count, and gonadotropin dosing. GnRHa-only triggers have a higher maturity rate than a dual trigger with high HCG. A prospective study is needed to evaluate this further to remove treatment assignment bias.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03514-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03514-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较双触发和单激动剂触发对未知生育能力个体进行计划卵母细胞冷冻保存的卵母细胞产量和成熟情况。方法:回顾性队列研究2010年1月至2023年3月接受促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(gnrh -only)触发与2023年3月接受促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(gnrh -only)触发的864例患者的1002个计划卵母细胞冷冻保存周期。“双触发”或GnRH-a与人绒毛膜促性腺激素(HCG) 1500-10,000 IU。主要观察指标为回收卵母细胞总数、成熟卵母细胞数和成熟率。结果:在调整了年龄、抗勒勒氏激素、体重指数、窦卵泡计数和促性腺激素最大剂量后,所有双触发组的卵母细胞回收量均显著低于单触发gnha组(p值)。结论:在计划进行卵母细胞冷冻保存的队列中,在调整了年龄、抗勒勒氏激素、体重指数、窦卵泡计数和促性腺激素剂量后,单触发gnha组的卵母细胞产量高于双触发gnha组。仅gnha触发比高HCG的双重触发具有更高的成熟率。需要一项前瞻性研究来进一步评估以消除治疗分配偏倚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Less is more: assessing trigger types in planned oocyte cryopreservation cycles.

Purpose: To compare oocyte yield and maturation with dual vs. agonist-only trigger for individuals with unknown fertility undergoing planned oocyte cryopreservation.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 1002 planned oocyte cryopreservation cycles among 864 patients from January 2010 to March 2023 who received gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist-only (GnRHa-only) trigger vs. "dual trigger" or GnRH-a with human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) 1500-10,000 IU. The main outcomes were total number of oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes, and maturity rate.

Results: After adjusting for age, anti-Müllerian hormone, body mass index, antral follicle count, and max gonadotropin dose, all dual trigger groups had significantly lower oocytes retrieved compared with the GnRHa-only trigger (p-values < 0.02). Additionally, the maturation rate was 10% lower in dual trigger with HCG 10,000 IU compared to GnRH agonist-only trigger (rate ratio = 0.9, p = 0.003). Dual triggers with lower doses of HCG (1500 and 5000 IU) had higher amounts of oocytes retrieved than dual trigger with HCG 10,000 IU, but there was no difference in maturity rate within dual triggers.

Conclusion: In a cohort undergoing planned oocyte cryopreservation, the GnRHa-only trigger had higher oocyte yield compared to dual triggers after adjusting for age, anti-Müllerian hormone, body mass index, antral follicle count, and gonadotropin dosing. GnRHa-only triggers have a higher maturity rate than a dual trigger with high HCG. A prospective study is needed to evaluate this further to remove treatment assignment bias.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
286
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species. The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信